'We still live in Alan Greenspan’s shadow'

When MoneyWeek launched 25 years ago, Alan Greenspan was in the chair at the US Federal Reserve. We’re still living with the consequences of the whirlwind he sowed then

Alan Greenspan Addresses the 18th Annual Monetary Conference
(Image credit: Alex Wong/Newsmakers)

The publication of Alan Greenspan’s memoir, The Age of Turbulence – a detailed apologia of his 19-year tenure at the US Federal Reserve (1987-2006) – coincided with the first gusts of the looming credit storm. In Britain, a historic bank run on Northern Rock was underway. “Inevitably, we now see his tenure through the prism of the current financial situation. Crisis may be too strong a word, but turbulence is certainly accurate,” noted a Guardian review in October 2007. To which the contemporary reader might add, you ain’t seen nothing yet.

Nearly two decades on, as Greenspan, 99, approaches his own centenary, the question posed by economist Howard Davies in 2007 hasn’t changed. “How far should the Fed be held responsible for sowing the seeds of the whirlwind by running an excessively lax monetary policy and… turning a blind eye to the explosion in subprime mortgages and the rapid growth of complex credit derivatives?” The only difference now is scale. If Greenspan’s Fed fuelled the global cataclysm of the Great Financial Crisis, it must also bear partial responsibility for everything that has happened since – from the distortions wrought by quantitative easing (QE) and the vast debt piles now crippling Western economies, to the growing chasm between the asset-rich and poor and the abandonment of notions of “moral hazard” in markets. If the great art of central banking – as outlined by Greenspan’s predecessor Paul Volcker – is knowing when to remove the “punchbowl” from the party, we are still nursing the hangover from the Maestro’s lengthy 1990s “Great Moderation” gig, which, as Britannica Money points out, remains “the longest official economic expansion in US history” and cemented Greenspan’s reputation as a “rock star” central banker.

MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

“The Greenspan put”

In 1987, Ronald Reagan nominated Greenspan to replace Volcker, says the Financial Times. A practised operator in the corridors of power, “he relished Washington’s social bubble and could play the status game with the best of them”, says Prospect. But it was his ability to deal with crises – from the October 1987 market crash through to the millennial dotbomb – that reassured his political masters over five successive terms. He became renowned for “the Greenspan put”: aggressively lowering rates to fight the popping of asset bubbles – a pragmatic approach at odds with his “hot-gospelling libertarian beliefs”, which fomented years of excessive risk, says the FT. Greenspan’s urgent desire to be at the heart of policymaking overcame his instincts – until eventually the mother of all bursting bubbles (to date…) overcame him.


This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.

Jane writes profiles for MoneyWeek and is city editor of The Week. A former British Society of Magazine Editors editor of the year, she cut her teeth in journalism editing The Daily Telegraph’s Letters page and writing gossip for the London Evening Standard – while contributing to a kaleidoscopic range of business magazines including Personnel Today, Edge, Microscope, Computing, PC Business World, and Business & Finance.

She has edited corporate publications for accountants BDO, business psychologists YSC Consulting, and the law firm Stephenson Harwood – also enjoying a stint as a researcher for the due diligence department of a global risk advisory firm.

Her sole book to date, Stay or Go? (2016), rehearsed the arguments on both sides of the EU referendum.

She lives in north London, has a degree in modern history from Trinity College, Oxford, and is currently learning to play the drums.