We must cut public sector salaries, not jobs

A few months ago I spoke to a local school governor. Cuts were already underway, she said. They'd had their budgets slashed, so they had had to let a teaching assistant go, despite the fact that she had been "vital."

Any idea what a teaching assistant makes these days? I'm guessing around £13,000. And a head teacher? Around £55,000-£60,000. So why did the teaching assistant have to go? £5,000 off the head teacher's salary and a bit off a few of the other high-level ones and no job losses would have been necessary. And was there no one at a more senior level who might have been less vital to the children's well being?

I thought of this conversation again this week when I looked at the employment numbers. In the three months to April, 7,000 public sector jobs went. You might think that's a good thing after all there are far, far too many public-sector workers. But look at which ones went many more teachers and social workers than managers.

Start your trial of MoneyWeek today

Get unparalleled financial insight, analysis and expert opinion you can profit from.

Start your trial

Sign up for MoneyWeek’s free twice-daily newsletter.

Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.

Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.

Sign up

This matters. If you ask an overpaid manager to save money on salaries, his instinct is not to cut his own salary and it isn't to cut the salaries or indeed the jobs of his fellow managers. It is to dump the people at the bottom of his pyramid and in particular the ones who have no say in management the ones with the least voice. No matter that they may be the ones actually doing the work.

That's why I'd really like to see savings come via salary cuts rather than via job cuts (although they will come in time, 750,000 of them, according to Capital Economics).

I've said here before that we should adopt a radical policy of saying that no one in the public sector should earn more than, say, £150,000 (the level at which Labour believes people are being paid enough to pay a special rate of rich people's income tax), and we should cut all salaries below that by a set percentage. Say, 15% off all salaries between £100,000 and £150,000; 10% off all from £75,000 to £100,000; and 5% from £50,000 to £75,000.

Along with that we need to look very quickly at the non-jobs and start cutting them (see my blog from earlier this week: How to get rid of public sector non-jobs). If we don't, it won't be long before there isn't a teaching assistant, let alone a nurse, left in the country.