If you earn over £150,000 from any source and are trying to build up a reasonable sized pension pot in a hurry, this April is going to irritate you. That's because your annual tax-free savings allowance is going to be cut from the £40,000 everyone else gets to a mere £10,000. That's more than most people save, but not enough to help you to a reasonably comfortable retirement (assuming you end up relying on your pension).
The good news for most people earning this kind of money is simply that they are earning this kind of money. So I suspect that most of them working in the private sector will after a bit of justifiable moaning accept the huge hit to their finances from the change and thank their lucky stars that they still get capital-gains tax relief on their main homes, a full Isa allowance and the various EIS and SEIS schemes on offer to play with.
Not so in the public sector, it seems. Instead of taking it on the chin, high-paid workers there seem to want to be compensated for the change. According to the Telegraph, a group of 12 trade unions representing "hundreds of thousands of workers including doctors, police officers, head teachers and civil servants have held private talks with David Gauke, Financial Secretary to the Treasury, demanding loopholes that would spare them" both this tax and the new Lifetime Allowance limit (the amount you can have in a pension on retirement without being hit by a 55% tax on the excess is coming down to £1m for £1.25m).
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
They want to be able to swap any pension contributions that would have been made on their behalf by the taxpayer and that would have taken them above their new allowances for higher salaries. This makes perfect sense for them (a civil servant on £210,000 would be able to swap their pension contributions for £45,000 of extra salary, says the Telegraph) given that it is absolutely the case that their total post-tax compensation is going to be nastily reduced by the new rules (so much so that there are already reports of people refusing promotion so as to keep their salaries below £150,000 more on this in a later blog).
But here's the thing: their problem is no different to that of people in the private sector, and it seems unlikely that anyone is going to offer them extra salary to compensate them for the government's new soak-the-rich rules. And if the well-paid in the private sector have to take a financial hit to (supposedly) bail out the public sector finances, why shouldn't the well-paid in the public sector take the same hit?
If MoneyWeek were in charge, we would dump the whole ludicrous policy. But if we couldn't do that, we would at least make sure that we didn't use it to make the pension deal for public sector workers even more superior to that of private sector workers than it already is.
-
Tycoon Truong My Lan on death row over world’s biggest bank fraudProperty tycoon Truong My Lan has been found guilty of a corruption scandal that dwarfs Malaysia’s 1MDB fraud and Sam Bankman-Fried’s crypto scam
-
Why undersea cables are under threat – and how to protect themUndersea cables power the internet and are vital to modern economies. They are now vulnerable
-
Our pension system, little-changed since Roman times, needs updatingOpinion The Romans introduced pensions, and we still have a similar system now. But there is one vital difference between Roman times and now that means the system needs updating, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
We’re doing well on pensions – but we still need to do betterOpinion Pensions auto-enrolment has vastly increased the number of people in the UK with retirement savings. But we’re still not engaged enough, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
Older people may own their own home, but the young have better pensionsOpinion UK house prices mean owning a home remains a pipe dream for many young people, but they should have a comfortable retirement, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
How to avoid a miserable retirementOpinion The trouble with the UK’s private pension system, says Merryn Somerset Webb, is that it leaves most of us at the mercy of the markets. And the outlook for the markets is miserable.
-
Young investors could bet on NFTs over traditional investmentsOpinion The first batch of child trust funds and Junior Isas are maturing. But young investors could be tempted to bet their proceeds on digital baubles such as NFTs rather than rolling their money over into traditional investments
-
Negative interest rates and the end of free bank accountsOpinion Negative interest rates are likely to mean the introduction of fees for current accounts and other banking products. But that might make the UK banking system slightly less awful, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
Pandemics, politicians and gold-plated pensionsAdvice As more and more people lose their jobs to the pandemic and the lockdowns imposed to deal with it, there’s one bunch of people who won’t have to worry about their future: politicians, with their generous defined-benefits pensions.
-
How the stamp duty holiday is pushing up house pricesOpinion Stamp duty is an awful tax and should be replaced by something better. But its temporary removal is driving up house prices, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
