Is it better to rip lots of people off and give some of your gains to charity or better to rip no one off in the first place? You'd think, if pushed, that the Church would go with the second. So I've been waiting for its leaders to say something about pay in the financial sector.
After all, while the idea that making money and morality are perfectly compatible is easily argued, it isn't so easy to make a moral case that excuses the ludicrous levels of executive pay in the financial and big corporate sectors. People have tried (think Stephen Green and Philip Richards) but in the end the fact remains that if you overpay a fund manager you rip off investors and if you overpay a CEO you rip off shareholders.
So I was pleased to see that, albeit rather late in the day, the Church of England, which manages a £5.3bn investment and property portfolio, has finally stepped up to the plate. It has announced, says the FT, that it will no longer support pay schemes where top managers get more than four times their salary in bonus. Why? "Because people should be paid what they are worth but not more than that." And right now many packages go beyond "what is either required or equitable".
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
That sounds about right is it equitable that Bob Diamond of Barclays got total bonus and incentive awards of £8.8m 35 times his salary in 2010? Of course it is not it represents no more that the ongoing effect of the talent myth.
The fact that the Church is not impressed by pay isn't going to have an immediate effect they aren't invested everywhere and their stance leaves the time-honoured option of simply raising base salaries to make the final numbers just as high as ever.
But their intervention might (I hope) mean that the tide is beginning to turn. It is under quiet discussion across the financial industry and this week someone possibly more influential than the Church on this kind of thing has had a go.
Stephen Peak of Henderson has publically criticised the £1.3m goodbye bonus given to the outgoing CEO of fund management group Gartmore. He is he says "staggered" and "incandescent" at what is a "clear reward for failure". The official line on this is that Jeff Meyer got his bonus as reward for his part in readying the company for sale (to Henderson as it happens). But as Ian King points out in today's Times, and as I have pointed out time after time, this kind of thing is surely part of a CEO's job description anyway. It is "part of his regular duties rather than something that qualifies him for a discretionary bonus".
And on most other measures few people shareholders in particular would be likely to think that Meyer is entitled to a penny of cash beyond his basic salary: Gartmore floated a year ago at 220p a share but the takeover valued it at 92p a share. A job not particularly well done. Perhaps he should have been fined, not paid more. Peak says that Andrew Skirton, the outgoing Gartmore chairman who approved the payment, should "hang his head in shame." He is right he should. And more people should say so.
-
8 of the best properties for sale with equestrian facilitiesThe best properties for sale with equestrian facilities – from a Georgian manor in Ceredigion, Wales, to a period farmhouse with an equine swimming pool in Banbury, Oxfordshire
-
Energy bills to rise by 1.2% in January 2025Energy bills are set to rise 1.2% in the New Year when the latest energy price cap comes into play, Ofgem has confirmed
-
Beating inflation takes more luck than skill – but are we about to get lucky?Opinion The US Federal Reserve managed to beat inflation in the 1980s. But much of that was down to pure luck. Thankfully, says Merryn Somerset Webb, the Bank of England may be about to get lucky.
-
Rishi Sunak can’t fix all our problems – so why try?Opinion Rishi Sunak’s Spring Statement is an attempt to plaster over problems the chancellor can’t fix. So should he even bother trying, asks Merryn Somerset Webb?
-
Young people are becoming a scarce resource – we should value them more highlyOpinion In the last two years adults have been bizarrely unkind to children and young people. That doesn’t bode well for the future, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
Ask for a pay rise – everyone else isOpinion As inflation bites and the labour market remains tight, many of the nation's employees are asking for a pay rise. Merryn Somerset Webb explains why you should do that too.
-
Why central banks should stick to controlling inflationOpinion The world’s central bankers are stepping out of their traditional roles and becoming much more political. That’s a mistake, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
How St Ives became St Tropez as the recovery drives prices sky highOpinion Merryn Somerset Webb finds herself at the epicentre of Britain’s V-shaped recovery as pent-up demand flows straight into Cornwall’s restaurants and beaches.
-
The real problem of Universal Basic Income (UBI)Merryn's Blog April employment numbers showed 75 per cent fewer people in the US returned to employment compared to expectations. Merryn Somerset-Webb explains how excessive government support is causing a shortage of labour.
-
Why an ageing population is not necessarily the disaster many people think it isOpinion We’ve got used to the idea that an ageing population is a bad thing. But that’s not necessarily true, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
