Back in 1582, Pope Gregory XIII ordered a change of calendar. Up until then, everyone had used the Julian calendar (named after Julius Caesar) and had done since 46 BC.
This had 11 months of 30 or 31 days and a 28-day February (extended to 29 days every fourth year). This sounds much like the calendar we use today and it was. However, it differed from the solar calendar by 11.23 minutes a year.
That doesn't sound like much. But over the centuries it does add up: by the 1500s, the Julian calendar was behind the solar calendar by ten days. So the Pope, who found that the shifting calendar was playing havoc with the timing of Easter, decided to set things straight by starting again with his new calendar the Gregorian.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
He issued a papal bull announcing that that the day following Thursday 4 October was not to be 5October but 15 October. He also changed the rules on leap years: they were now to come in all years that are divisible by four, but not by 100 (unless they are also divisible by 400), to stop things getting out of sync again.
Most of Europe gradually got around to adopting the system. The UK took a couple of hundred years to get used to the idea, but eventually it too capitulated: Wednesday, 2 September 1752 was immediately followed by Thursday 14 September, and that was that.
Julius Caesar had set the New Year at the spring equinox (25 March at the time). The Treasury decided that the taxation year in 1752 would remain as long as usual (365 days), so in order to compensate the state for the 11 lost days, it moved the end of the tax year to 4 April, and then on to 5 April to make up for a lost leap year. There it has stayed.
I'm telling you this only as a slightly more interesting way of leading into a few more comments on Isas, and the fact that if you haven't protected this year's cash from the usually overly sticky hand of the taxman yet, now's your chance: you've only gotnine days left to do it.
Thanks to Pope Gregory XIII, the new tax year is almost upon us. I've written here several times before about my mild preference for Isas over pensions (it is all about simplicity).
But it occurs to me that there is extra reason for the young to be particularly keen on Isas:they give savings flexibility, which is nice; butthey also give the ability to defer tax relief. If you are currently a 20% taxpayer, but you anticipate being a 40% taxpayer in the future, you can save into an Isa now. Then, when your tax rate has risen, you can shift the cash into a pension and claim back 40% instead of 20% - even though the money was earned when you were only paying tax at the lower rate.
George Osborne clearly intends to make us a nation of 40% taxpayers before too long: his budget will have dragged another 1.3 million people into the top rate band by 2014, so the wait before you move the money might not be particularly long.
I don't suppose that this is the kind of move that the Treasury particularly approves of, but it's the kind of thing that happens when you make a tax system unduly complicated.
-
Tycoon Truong My Lan on death row over world’s biggest bank fraudProperty tycoon Truong My Lan has been found guilty of a corruption scandal that dwarfs Malaysia’s 1MDB fraud and Sam Bankman-Fried’s crypto scam
-
Why undersea cables are under threat – and how to protect themUndersea cables power the internet and are vital to modern economies. They are now vulnerable
-
Our pension system, little-changed since Roman times, needs updatingOpinion The Romans introduced pensions, and we still have a similar system now. But there is one vital difference between Roman times and now that means the system needs updating, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
We’re doing well on pensions – but we still need to do betterOpinion Pensions auto-enrolment has vastly increased the number of people in the UK with retirement savings. But we’re still not engaged enough, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
Older people may own their own home, but the young have better pensionsOpinion UK house prices mean owning a home remains a pipe dream for many young people, but they should have a comfortable retirement, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
How to avoid a miserable retirementOpinion The trouble with the UK’s private pension system, says Merryn Somerset Webb, is that it leaves most of us at the mercy of the markets. And the outlook for the markets is miserable.
-
Young investors could bet on NFTs over traditional investmentsOpinion The first batch of child trust funds and Junior Isas are maturing. But young investors could be tempted to bet their proceeds on digital baubles such as NFTs rather than rolling their money over into traditional investments
-
Negative interest rates and the end of free bank accountsOpinion Negative interest rates are likely to mean the introduction of fees for current accounts and other banking products. But that might make the UK banking system slightly less awful, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
Pandemics, politicians and gold-plated pensionsAdvice As more and more people lose their jobs to the pandemic and the lockdowns imposed to deal with it, there’s one bunch of people who won’t have to worry about their future: politicians, with their generous defined-benefits pensions.
-
How the stamp duty holiday is pushing up house pricesOpinion Stamp duty is an awful tax and should be replaced by something better. But its temporary removal is driving up house prices, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
