Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
An account already exists for this email address, please log in.
The FSA won't kill the housing market recovery – it's doomed anyway
The FSA has finally decided to 'do something' about reckless lending. But its proposals are too little too late. And whatever anxious property bulls may claim, they will have no impact on house prices.
Another empty stable door is about to be shut. Having failed to do anything in the good times about mortgage deals that offered 125% of the value of your home, six times your salary, or no proof of income, the Financial Services Authority (FSA)has finally decided to "do something" about reckless lending.
But its proposals are too little too late. And whatever anxious property bulls may claim, they will have no impact on house prices.
The FSA's proposals are garnering plenty of headlines but are actually pretty modest. Although not finalised, they are expected to require lenders to show that a borrower has proof of income. Further, says Melanie Bien of Savills: "the capital resources of lenders will be considered" with the possibility of "new levels being set".
Try 6 free issues of MoneyWeek today
Get unparalleled financial insight, analysis and expert opinion you can profit from.
Sign up for MoneyWeek’s free twice-daily newsletter.
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Sure, self-certification of income used to be popular, accounting for 23% of residential mortgages, but only one lender still offers this type of product. That's because no-one wants it any more. Any self-employed people or freelancers thinking of applying for a big loan to fund an asset that will probably drop in value in the current economic climate are, to put it charitably, in a minority.
It's the same with buy-to-let: it's yesterday's investment. Many amateur landlords who bought near or at the top of the market would probably be happy to back out altogether if they could find a buyer. Few are anxious to get themselves further into debt, whatever the lending rules.
Meanwhile, about the only measures that would have a direct impact the imposition of formal loan-to-value limits and/or income multiples are unlikely ever to be introduced. They are not needed. Lenders are already rationing credit and mortgages, fearful of more bad debt losses.
So ignore the brouhaha being generated about the FSA "killing off a housing market recovery". There are bigger forces at work rising unemployment for starters that will do the job much more effectively.
Explore More
Sign up for MoneyWeek's newsletters
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Tim graduated with a history degree from Cambridge University in 1989 and, after a year of travelling, joined the financial services firm Ernst and Young in 1990, qualifying as a chartered accountant in 1994.
He then moved into financial markets training, designing and running a variety of courses at graduate level and beyond for a range of organisations including the Securities and Investment Institute and UBS. He joined MoneyWeek in 2007.
