Aurora Innovation is running on empty – is it overvalued?
Aurora Innovation, a maker of self-driving trucks, may have promised far more than it can deliver
While many technology firms seem to have reached the stage where they are making money from AI, other companies have achieved huge valuations based solely on a promise of future profits. And some have not yet even been able to make their technology commercially viable. These companies are particularly vulnerable to any shift in market sentiment.
One that may have promised far more than it can deliver is Aurora Innovation (Nasdaq: AUR). Aurora Innovation focuses on the development of self-driving trucks, arguing that by doing away with the need for a driver, it will cut the costs of transportation and be able to grab a large share of the US trucking market – which had revenues of $987 billion in 2023. The company boasts it has already conducted many tests to prove the technology works on various highways in the US and is poised to roll it out across the rest of the country.
Flaws in Aurora Innovation's plan
However, analysts are sceptical, with Sahm Adrangi of Kerrisdale Capital arguing that the group’s product suffers from two major flaws. Firstly, its bespoke system (like many other companies involved in self-driving) relies on Aurora spending huge amounts of time and money mapping each of the 50,000 miles in the US Interstate Highway System. Despite years of research and development (R&D), it has managed to map and test fully only a 200-mile stretch of highway, with a few hundred additional miles in the pipeline.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Even when this task is finished, it will only be able to operate on highways rather than within cities. This means that companies that use them will first have to deliver their goods from their factories or warehouses to special terminals, where they will be handed off to Aurora’s trucks, with the same thing happening in reverse once they reach their destination. The costs of this additional step will mean that making a trip using Aurora’s technology will actually cost more than using ordinary manned trucks for all but the very longest journeys, which represent a tiny fraction of deliveries.
Given these dismal economics, it is not surprising that Aurora’s gross revenues are expected to amount to a paltry $40 million in 2026, with annual losses predicted to rise to $864 million in the same period, compared with losses of $91 million in 2019. Throw in competition from other firms pursuing similar technology, and it is hard to see how Aurora’s valuation of roughly $10.5 billion is sustainable.
Not surprisingly, the market seems to be cooling on the self-driving truck company, with the share price down by half from its peak at the start of this year. It is also below both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages. As a result, I suggest you short Aurora at the current price of $5.73 at £2.25 per $0.01. In this case, you should cover your short if it gets above $9.73, which gives you a total downside of £950.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.

-
MoneyWeek news quiz: How many bank branches have closed in past decade?Quiz From potential tax hikes in the Autumn Budget to Nationwide extending its branch promise, it’s been a busy week for financial news. Review your knowledge of the top stories in our weekly quiz.
-
Cash ISA vs stocks and shares ISA: which is better for your money?The debate over low-risk cash ISAs versus higher-returning stocks and shares ISAs overlooks the fact that both have an important role for different goals
-
The battle of the bond markets and public financesAn obsessive focus on short-term fiscal prudence is likely to create even greater risks in a few years, says Cris Sholto Heaton
-
Rishi Sunak: We need a cultural change to make people invest, not a policy changePodcast On the MoneyWeek Talks podcast, Rishi Sunak tells Kalpana Fitzpatrick that we need better numeracy skills to improve financial literacy and boost the economy.
-
STS Global Income & Growth: Buying quality at a discountInvestors should consider STS Global Income & Growth to diversify away from mega-cap tech
-
'We still live in Alan Greenspan’s shadow'When MoneyWeek launched 25 years ago, Alan Greenspan was chairman of the Federal Reserve. We’re still living with the consequences of the whirlwind he sowed
-
Venture capital trusts that offer growth, income and tax reliefOpinion Alex Davies, founder of high-net-worth investment service Wealth Club, picks three venture capital trusts where he'd put his money
-
Go for growth: how to invest in emerging marketsDeveloping countries offer investors compelling long-term economic prospects, says David Prosser
-
How to invest in private equityNew forms of private equity funds give access to ordinary investors of more modest means. Should they rush in?
-
Isaac Newton's golden legacy – how the English polymath created the gold standard by accidentIsaac Newton brought about a new global economic era by accident, says Dominic Frisby