Reeves told scrapping pension salary sacrifice would cost average earner £377 a year

MPs – including chancellor Rachel Reeves – have received a letter warning of the dangers in reducing or removing salary sacrifice schemes for pension contributions, a plan under consideration by HMRC.

Employee saving into a pension piggy bank
Reeves told scrapping pension salary sacrifice would cost average earner £377 a year
(Image credit: Getty Images)

Changes to salary sacrifice schemes, an option which HMRC hypothetically explored earlier this year, would cost millions of employees hundreds of pounds a year, a group of retirement specialists has told MPs.

Salary sacrifice for pensions – also known as salary exchange – is where an employee gives up a portion of their salary in return for their employer paying an equivalent amount into their pension. There is a National Insurance Contribution (NIC) saving to both employees and employers from this arrangement, which costs the Treasury around £4 billion a year.

MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

Because of how salary sacrifice works, the negative effects of ditching the schemes would be greater for those earning less than £50,284 a year, the Society said.

“It would also represent another sizeable cost to employers, despite the chancellor’s public commitment against this, and would undermine the critical role that employers play in supporting and promoting good quality pension saving vehicles.”

How does salary sacrifice work?

Salary sacrifice for pensions works by an employee exchanging some of their salary in return for their employer paying the same amount into their pension.

While funded by the employee, these contributions are treated as employer pension contributions for income tax and National Insurance purposes. This means pension salary sacrifice normally leads to savings in both the employee and employer National Insurance contributions.

This is because NICs are not due on employer pension contributions, whereas employee pension contributions are made after the deduction of National Insurance.

However, many employers share their NIC savings with their employees, meaning more is added to their pension, and salary sacrifice also allows employees to pay higher pension contributions for the same net pay.

The impact of scrapping pension salary sacrifice would be greater for those earning less than £50,284 a year, for whom employee National Insurance contributions are 8%. For those earning more than £50,284 a year, employee NICs on everything above that level are 2%, so the overall impact is less.

The Society of Pension Professionals pointed out that while there is a £4 billion cost to the government in providing salary sacrifice arrangements – £1.2 billion for employees and £2.9 billion for employers – there is also “widespread recognition that this is a positive investment that incentivises pension saving”.

Martin Willis, partner at pension firm Barnett Waddingham, said: “Rumours are again circling about changes to, or the scrapping of, salary sacrifice. While this could help the government recover National Insurance revenue, in practice it would be highly disruptive, complex, and introduce additional cost pressures for employers.

“Previous suggestions of a cap on salary sacrifice may help protect middle earners, but in reality this could add complexity while still squeezing employer costs and contribution rates. Alternatively, removing salary sacrifice entirely would hit average earners the hardest, particularly those relying on it to boost their pension savings.

“Policymakers should think very carefully before pursuing reforms that make it harder for ordinary workers to save for retirement.”

Laura Miller

Laura Miller is an experienced financial and business journalist. Formerly on staff at the Daily Telegraph, her freelance work now appears in the money pages of all the national newspapers. She endeavours to make money issues easy to understand for everyone, and to do justice to the people who regularly trust her to tell their stories. She lives by the sea in Aberystwyth. You can find her tweeting @thatlaurawrites