For the last 20 years just about every major retail chain has had a web presence of some sort. They have met with varying degrees of success. Some are full-scale e-commerce sites that have their own customers, brand and presence. Others are click-and-collect options for customers who don’t want to spend time browsing in the actual shop. Others are more like extended advertisements: you can see what the shop has to offer before heading off to a branch.
Now a few are starting to see those websites as separate units. US department store Saks started the trend in March this year when it announced that it planned to separate out its department stores and its web unit. In the spring Saks online was expected to be worth about $2bn. That has already tripled to closer to $6bn and it might be even more by the time the unit is floated early next year. Rival Macy’s is now expected to follow with a break-up of its own that could double the value of the business to $14bn. Over in the Netherlands, Ahold has decided to break out its Bol unit, again with a big potential uplift in value for shareholders. Many others might well decide to follow suit.
It is not hard to see what major retailers are up to. There are three big advantages to a break-up. First, it means that fast-growing web units can grow more rapidly, without being weighed down by a struggling chain of physical shops, and will therefore be more highly rated by the market. A retailer’s online business is often largely hidden, but if it was broken out it would suddenly have a lot more visibility to investors. Second, it means that management will have the autonomy to really grow the business. Internally, senior executives would probably prefer it if the online business simply sent customers to the nearest shopping centre for some proper shopping rather than serving them electronically. Freed from parent firms, web units can focus fully on growing the online business.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Finally, it means the brands, and indeed the firms, can survive in a changing market. We will see how it plays out, but it is possible Saks or Macy’s will survive as web businesses long after the physical shops have finally closed down. That is a lot better than waiting for the whole thing to collapse, which is what happened to British chains such as Top Shop – indeed, if Top Shop had spun out its web unit five years ago it would probably still be around as an independent brand.
Be brave and initiate divorce
The logic is compelling. But will any UK retailers be brave enough to follow suit? There would be issues to sort out. Brand names would have to be jointly owned by the online and physical units. There might need to be some form of cross-shareholding. But these problems need not be insuperable. Next is an obvious candidate for a split. It already has online sales of more than £2bn a year and those are growing strongly, and it has already started adding other brands, such as Victoria’s Secret. It is certainly strong enough to survive as an independent unit and although Next’s shares have done brilliantly well over the last decade, in part because of the success of its web operation, there is no question that a split would create a lot of extra value. Kingfisher’s B&Q unit would work well as an online company as well as a physical chain, delivering DIY kit to the home market. It is not as if people especially want to go to B&Q.
John Lewis is struggling because it expanded far too rapidly at a time when retailing was tipping into deep decline, but its website is still trusted. A stand-alone John Lewis web operation would provide an alternative to Amazon in markets such as home furnishings and electronics. Waitrose as a purely online operation could rival Ocado. More radically, Tesco, Sainsbury’s, or even Morrisons under its new private-equity owners, could spin out their home-delivery service
-
Could your family be at risk of an unexpected tax bill? How to keep your loved ones in the loopMany families are out of the loop when it comes to planning the financial aspects of both retirement and inheritance
-
Rightmove: Glut of homes for sale in southern England drives asking price dropAsking prices are 0.1% lower than a year ago, according to the property website, driven by challenges in affordability-stretched London and the south
-
Small UK industrial stocks are hidden gemsOpinion Ed Wielechowski of the Odyssean Investment Trust highlights three of his favourite British small-cap industrial stocks
-
Aurora Innovation is running on empty – is it overvalued?Aurora Innovation, a maker of self-driving trucks, may have promised far more than it can deliver
-
'Ride the recovery in emerging markets': Gustavo Medeiros of Ashmore Group tells MoneyWeekInterview What's the outlook for emerging markets? Gustavo Medeiros, head of research at Ashmore Group, gives his analysis and reviews progress in developing economies
-
What is the Enterprise Investment Scheme and should you have one?The Enterprise Investment Scheme is tax-efficient and potentially lucrative. Taking a chance on the scheme could trim your family’s IHT bill, says David Prosser
-
The alcohol industry is suffering as consumers sober up – is it still worth investing in the sector?Changing consumer tastes are rocking the alcohol industry, but the best players are adapting their strategies. Buy them while their shares are still cheap
-
A strange calm in creditCorporate bond markets remain remarkably relaxed, with yields that offer little compensation for risks
-
'The City's big bet on green finance fails to pay out'Opinion Insurers and banks are backing away from “green finance”, and there is not much sign of the green boom we were promised. That’s a problem for the City
-
Six top investment trusts for smaller stocksLiquidity constraints mean investment trusts are best placed to seize the juiciest opportunities
