Trump’s Covid diagnosis has rattled markets – but you should sit tight

Donald Trump’s positive test for Covid-19 sent the markets into a tizz. But it’s not worth changing your investment plans over, says John Stepek. Here, he explains why.

Donald Trump has been diagnosed with Covid-19.

That rattled markets somewhat first thing this morning. It sounds like a big deal. And if you’re a reporter on politics, or a White House employee getting tested for Covid-19, then it is.

But in the grand scheme of things, is it really something that should have you rushing to adjust your portfolio?

You can see why Trump’s diagnosis has rattled markets

When I got up this morning. I had a quick glance to see what was going on in the markets (it’s a bad habit, don’t copy it).

I noticed that Nasdaq futures had dropped rather rapidly in the space of about five minutes (long story short, futures prices trade even when the market is closed). Oh and gold was spiking higher too.

Clearly, something had happened.

So I flicked on Twitter – there are lots of things to dislike about Twitter, but it’s hard to beat for breaking news. The reason for the slide rapidly became apparent – Donald Trump and his wife Melania have both tested positive for Covid-19.

I have to admit, my immediate thought was – when’s this going to bounce? Which perhaps shows how the “buy the dip” mentality has got its grip on even the most cynical among us.

Then again, maybe it’s not that daft. Even as I’m writing this, futures are climbing higher. Maybe by the time the US market opens for business, it’ll be back to square one.

You can see why the market reacted. Like it or not, the US president is the most important politician in the world. If he’s ill with a potentially debilitating or even lethal virus, then that’s going to disrupt the governance process of the most important economy in the world, particularly if he’s infected a lot of other people in the White House too.

On top of that, we’re a month away from what is certain to be one of the most contentious presidential elections on record. I mean, it already is. How will it affect that? Does it mean that Joe Biden is more or less likely to win?

And what if Trump infected Biden the other night at the debate? What if Biden gets seriously ill? What if they both get seriously ill? Might we even end up looking at entirely different presidential candidates?

Those are a lot of “what ifs”. They’re the sort of “what ifs” that could inspire anyone to panic and look at reshuffling their portfolio or hitting the “go to cash!” button.

But let’s take a step back.

Will the US have a president in a year’s time? Of course

When market “events” happen, I find it helps to try to skip over the immediate panic and focus on the aftermath.

You can drive yourself mad trying to second guess what all of this means. You could go a long way down a rabbit hole trying to work out exactly who would take charge of the US if enough of the top people are debilitated by coronavirus.

You could also spend lots of time exploring conspiracy theories and trying to work out “cui bono” from all the different scenarios. There’s even a group of people who think Trump is faking it so he can make a triumphant jack-in-the-box return to campaigning in a fortnight’s time.

Here’s my suggestion: don’t waste your time. You’re not a day trader (if you are, consider whether it's worth the emotional stress – you may have a moment of clarity).

None of this is worth changing your investment plans over. To be honest, while I always tell you to keep a watchlist in case a bit of panic selling drives down the price of a company or market you’re keen to buy, I’m not even sure that it’s going to end up being a buying opportunity.

Depending on who wins the US election, certain sectors may benefit while others may suffer (and there may be some opportunities in that – we’ll be writing more on this in the lead up, so subscribe to MoneyWeek magazine now to get your first six issues free).

And yes, the next few months are likely to be hairy, which was always the case, even before Trump caught Covid. The election might be contested, which means that we might have a repeat of the 2000 US election, only much much angrier. We might not know who’s going to be president for a prolonged period.

But as to the bigger picture – a year from now, will the US have a president? I’m going to bet that the answer is “yes”. And regardless of who it is, their actions are going to be shaped by far larger forces than their own policy preferences.

The economy will still be suffering the after-effects (or the immediate effects, depending on whether it’s over by then) of the pandemic. Whatever else that means, it points to an electorate clamouring for more government spending.

Neither the Republicans nor the Democrats oppose more spending. They differ on who they think should get the money – but that’s it.

So in all, if you were happy with your asset allocation before this happened, you should be happy with it now. Nothing major has changed. We might see a bit more volatility than we were already going to see. But you don’t need to worry about that, because presumably you’ve got a financial plan that stretches beyond Christmas.

And if you don’t, you know what to do – get one.

Recommended

The charts that matter: more pain for goldbugs
Economy

The charts that matter: more pain for goldbugs

Gold investors saw more disappointment this week as the yellow metal took a tumble. Here’s what’s happened to the charts that matter most to the globa…
18 Sep 2021
The new social-care levy: an unfair tax that protects the “assetocracy”
National Insurance

The new social-care levy: an unfair tax that protects the “assetocracy”

The government’s regressive social-care levy will make Britain’s tax system even more complex. Root-and-branch reform is long overdue.
18 Sep 2021
Kieran Heinemann: the history of shareholder capitalism
Investment strategy

Kieran Heinemann: the history of shareholder capitalism

Merryn talks to Kieran Heinemann, author of Playing the Market: Retail Investment and Speculation in Twentieth-Century Britain, about the history of t…
17 Sep 2021
Cryptocurrency roundup: litecoin blunder, cardano update and bitcoin mining in Laos
Bitcoin & crypto

Cryptocurrency roundup: litecoin blunder, cardano update and bitcoin mining in Laos

Saloni Sardana looks at the week’s biggest stories in the world of cryptocurrencies.
17 Sep 2021

Most Popular

The times may be changing, but don’t change how you invest
Small cap stocks

The times may be changing, but don’t change how you invest

We are living in strange times. But the basics of investing remain the same: buy fairly-priced stocks that can provide an income. And there are few be…
13 Sep 2021
Two shipping funds to buy for steady income
Investment trusts

Two shipping funds to buy for steady income

Returns from owning ships are volatile, but these two investment trusts are trying to make the sector less risky.
7 Sep 2021
Should investors be worried about stagflation?
US Economy

Should investors be worried about stagflation?

The latest US employment data has raised the ugly spectre of “stagflation” – weak growth and high inflation. John Stepek looks at what’s going on and …
6 Sep 2021