Before we get started on today’s glorious mash-up of two of our readers’ favourite subjects, I just wanted to let you know that you can now get your – FREE – tickets to come and see me and Merryn interviewing Russell Napier in Edinburgh on the evening of Saturday April 30th.
We’ll be talking in Russell’s Library of Mistakes, which has just moved to newer, larger premises (there are a lot of financial mistakes to fit in). It promises to be a fun night – the tickets are free, as I already mentioned, but there are only 60 available, so book now!
And now, over to Dominic…
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Today we return to one of my favourite subjects, and one that we periodically visit on these pages: UK house prices measured in gold…
It makes sense to measure house prices with a less flexible form of money
As regular readers will know, I am firmly of the mind that unaffordable housing in the UK (and indeed across most of the developed world) is as much a consequence of our system of money and credit as it is of dumb, prohibitive planning laws.
If interest rates reflected actual inflation, the story would be very different. And I’m not talking about the consumer price index (CPI) measure targeted by the Bank of England (and even that now stands at over 6%). I’m talking about the inflation of the money supply, whether via debt expansion or quantitative easing (QE), and the resulting costs felt.
House prices are currently rising at roughly 11% a year, and you’re telling me inflation is only 6%? Pull the other one.
The incremental effects of these rises – 4% one year, 12% the next – over many decades have made house prices ludicrously unaffordable to young people. It’s been going on since at least the early 1990s, and the days when Ken Clarke was chancellor. Salaries have not kept up.
If interest rates rose to reflect our current 11% house price inflation then the ensuing rush for the exit would pretty quickly make house prices affordable again. The entire house-of-cards economy would come crashing down too, but that’s another matter.
For this reason, we conduct the occasional exercise of measuring house prices in sound money. Gold has served this role since the Stone Age, and so we bow to the wisdom of Mother Nature, and use it here.
The pound in your pocket has lost a lot of value compared to a house…
The average price of a house in the UK is now £280,000 according to the Office for National Statistics and the Land Registry. The average salary is £31,285, so house prices are at nine times earnings.
The house prices to earnings ratio in most big cities, especially in the south, is much more distorted than that. It was three times when I bought my first flat in London in 1993.
We’ll start with house prices in pounds.
This chart goes all the way back to 1953, when mortgages barely existed. Debt is the big driver of house prices – if there is no debt in a market, prices will reflect local cash levels and be much lower. Introduce debt, and up go prices. (Debt, even with all that QE, remains the biggest supply of new money).
On the other hand, debt makes it possible to do things now you would otherwise not be able to do – like buy a house.
But keep debt costs low and more money enters the system, prices stay high and the economy “grows”. That’s why the authorities prefer to keep interest rates down.
“You’ve never had it so good”, was the government’s cry at the time, as the Tories actively encouraged a “property-owning democracy”. Stamp duty was cut and the government lent money to building societies, so they could issue mortgages. Home ownership rose from 29% in 1951 to 45% by 1964, and the train of higher prices was put in motion. They rose by over 50% during that period.
The above chart is astonishing in its relentless rise higher. It looks like bitcoin! The crash of the early 1990s, in which hundreds of thousands of people lost their homes amind surging interest rates, is a mere blip. Far fewer lost their homes in 2008, because rates were slashed.
But looked at from another perspective, you can see just how much value your money has lost. In 1953, the average house cost £1,891. Today it’s 150 times that. The pound has lost more than 99% of its purchasing power in 70 years.
Money. Huh! It’s a fraud. But you can’t do without it.
… but the gold in your vault has not
Next we turn our attention to UK house prices measured in a much sounder form of money - one that central banks can’t print. This is the same house prices measured in gold since 1953.
As you can see, it’s rather a different story.
Back in 1953 the average house cost 150 ounces of gold. Same price as in 2020.
Wait a minute, what?
And today a house will cost you 205 ounces of gold.
Wait a minute you’re telling me house prices are only up 30% since 1953?
If you measure them in gold, yup.
In 1980 you could buy the average UK house for 50 ounces of gold. You could have done so in the 1930s as well (not shown on the chart).
In 2004, with gold sitting at around $400 an ounce, and the average house at £150,000, it took over 700 ounces to buy a house. The noughties aside, the long-term “normal” price of a British house in gold terms is a range of somewhere between 150 and 300 ounces.
So what’s next for the house price to gold ratio?
I thought the end was nigh for the housing bubble in 2007. I was wrong. I didn’t foresee them slashing interest rates like that. Wow betide anyone who calls the top in housing. The only thing that will send house prices lower is increased rates – though even at 3% or 4% there would be problems.
No policy-maker wants falling house prices on their watch, partly because they own houses, partly because of the damage to their reputation and partly because they don’t want to see people lose their homes (never mind those who can’t afford). So I very much doubt that we will see rates reach the levels that real (and even CPI) inflation suggests they should be.
Perhaps the Bank of England’s hands will be forced, maybe by problems in the gilt market, spiralling food and energy prices, or the rising cost of deglobalisation. But never underestimate the ability of central bankers to print and obfuscate.
On the other hand, gold looks like it wants to go higher. It’s gold – it has a propensity to disappoint (to put it mildly), but, from war to riots to inflation, it is not like there is currently a shortage of fundamental drivers to push it higher.
So I would argue that that ratio will come back to 150 ounces a house before it goes to 300.
And, who knows, a little bit of a crisis will send it back to 50 ounces.
“Yes, yes”, my father used to say. “But you can’t live in gold. And gold doesn't pay rent.”
He has a point. But so do I. Central banking has left a generation homeless. Fiat money has done terrible things to society.
Dominic’s film, Adam Smith: Father of the Fringe, about the unlikely influence of the father of economics on the greatest arts festival in the world is now available to watch on YouTube.
Dominic Frisby (“mercurially witty” – the Spectator) is the world’s only financial writer and comedian. He is MoneyWeek’s main commentator on gold, commodities, currencies and cryptocurrencies. He is the author of the books Bitcoin: the Future of Money? and Life After The State. He also co-wrote the documentary Four Horsemen, and presents the chat show, Stuff That Interests Me.
His show 2016 Let’s Talk About Tax was a huge hit at the Edinburgh Festival and Penguin Random House have since commissioned him to write a book on the subject – Daylight Robbery – the past, present and future of tax will be published later this year. His 2018 Edinburgh Festival show, Dominic Frisby's Financial Gameshow, won rave reviews. Dominic was educated at St Paul's School, Manchester University and the Webber-Douglas Academy Of Dramatic Art.
You can follow him on Twitter @dominicfrisby
Who is the richest person in the world?
The top five richest people in the world have a combined net worth of $825 billion. Who takes the crown for the richest person in the world?
By Vaishali Varu Published
Top 10 stocks with highest growth over past decade - from Nvidia, Microsoft to Netflix, which companies made you the most money?
We reveal the 10 global companies with the biggest returns since 2013. One firm has posted an astonishing 9,870% return, meaning a £1,000 investment would now be worth almost £82,000.
By Ruth Emery Published
Halifax: House price slump continues as prices slide for the sixth consecutive month
UK house prices fell again in September as buyers returned, but the slowdown was not as fast as anticipated, latest Halifax data shows. Where are house prices falling the most?
By Kalpana Fitzpatrick Published
Rents hit a record high - but is the opportunity for buy-to-let investors still strong?
UK rent prices have hit a record high with the average hitting over £1,200 a month says Rightmove. Are there still opportunities in buy-to-let?
By Marc Shoffman Published
Pension savers turn to gold investments
Investors are racing to buy gold to protect their pensions from a stock market correction and high inflation, experts say
By Ruth Emery Published
Where to find the best returns from student accommodation
Student accommodation can be a lucrative investment if you know where to look.
By Marc Shoffman Published
Best investing apps
We round up the best investing apps. Looking for an easy-to-use app to help you start investing, keep track of your portfolio or make trades on the go?
By Ruth Emery Last updated
The top funds to invest in
Tips Investors put Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust back on top, and India is the new investment hotspot - We look at what investors have been adding to their portfolios in the last month
By Vaishali Varu Last updated
The world’s best bargain stocks
Searching for bargain stocks with Alec Cutler of the Orbis Global Balanced Fund, who tells Andrew Van Sickle which sectors are being overlooked.
By Andrew Van Sickle Published
Revealed: the cheapest cities to own a home in Britain
New research reveals the cheapest cities to own a home, taking account of mortgage payments, utility bills and council tax
By Ruth Emery Published