Large caps start to struggle: time to reassess your focus?

Stock exchange graph showing stocks struggling

(Image credit: Getty Images)

published 27 March 2025

One of the best strategies during the last market regime was to buy quality large caps, as epitomised by Terry Smith. Quality is rather a flexible concept in investment – most people prefer to say they hold good businesses rather than trash – but broadly this meant companies with high return on equity, low leverage, and steady earnings that produce reliable cash flows and strong global growth prospects.

A decade ago, quality investors favoured areas such as consumer staples – often developed-market firms with exposure to emerging markets. Later, some of these stocks started to struggle amid slower emerging-market growth and the return of inflation after the pandemic, while the tech sector began to lead markets. So quality investors shifted a little towards software or data services, where the best businesses have steady recurring revenue, low capital intensity and the ability to lock in loyal customers.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

You can see these shifts play out in Fundsmith’s history. In February 2015, the fund had 40% in consumer staples, by far its largest position. By February 2020, technology was the top sector at 29%, slightly ahead of consumer staples. Then last month, it held 32% in health care, with 20% in consumer staples. Fundsmith has been more flexible than some other quality strategies and the steady move into healthcare could help performance rebound if tech is reaching a peak.

However, the tricky question for quality large-cap strategies – not just Fundsmith – is whether the entire approach faces a much tougher environment. The last era was hugely favourable for large multinationals. Globalisation gave them the chance to expand into new markets around the world, while politicians and regulators were often very relaxed about waving through cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Big companies grew ever bigger and more profitable.

There are compelling reasons to think this may be over. In the short term, tariffs will mostly hurt firms that ship goods across borders, rather than services. But in the longer term, fragmentation and antagonism create a more hostile world for multinationals. The US slaps more tariffs on European goods. Europe cranks up regulation on US tech giants. The US strikes back against European firms… and so on in a vicious circle.

Cris Sholto Heaton is an investment analyst and writer who has been contributing to MoneyWeek since 2006 and was managing editor of the magazine between 2016 and 2018. He is especially interested in international investing, believing many investors still focus too much on their home markets and that it pays to take advantage of all the opportunities the world offers. He often writes about Asian equities, international income and global asset allocation.

Cris began his career in financial services consultancy at PwC and Lane Clark & Peacock, before an abrupt change of direction into oil, gas and energy at Petroleum Economist and Platts and subsequently into investment research and writing. In addition to his articles for MoneyWeek, he also works with a number of asset managers, consultancies and financial information providers.

He holds the Chartered Financial Analyst designation and the Investment Management Certificate, as well as degrees in finance and mathematics. He has also studied acting, film-making and photography, and strongly suspects that an awareness of what makes a compelling story is just as important for understanding markets as any amount of qualifications.