Buying shares can be a tricky business
A tip gone bad reminds John Stepek that buying shares in troubled companies in the hope that they can turn themselves around doesn't always pay off.
Buying individual shares is a hazardous business. That’s why we have diversified portfolios and that’s why the majority of investors hold the lion’s share of their equities in funds of some sort, rather than holding individual companies. It’s also why I try to avoid tipping individual stocks – however convinced you are of a stock’s merits, you can never be sure that something won’t go wrong.
And so it has proved with my pre-Christmas share tip. In our 20 December issue, I suggested buying high-street stalwart Marks & Spencer (M&S), perhaps bolstered by the success of my 2018 tip, Next. I shouldn’t have got cocky – last Thursday, M&S promptly issued a Christmas trading update that sent its share price down by more than 10%. The group managed to grow like-for-like sales, but a poor performance from its clothing business saw disappointed investors sell out.
I’ll admit that I was in two minds about the original tip. I’ve slagged M&S off on several occasions over the years. My overall view – that it’s a complacent business that has been riding on the back of its undeserved “national treasure” status for years, if not decades, hasn’t changed dramatically. I even described it as being “not a terribly good company” and one “with a long history of disappointing”. So I can’t argue that this latest failure comes out of the blue. It’s clear that both the wider market and I had grown far too optimistic on the pace of its latest turnaround. So what’s the story now?
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
I can’t say I’m pleased to have tipped a stock that has fallen by the best part of 15% in less than a month. That said, I’m going to give it the benefit of the doubt for now. Firstly, I think the fall mostly reflects the fact that investors had got their hopes up for a faster pace of change. Secondly, as I also pointed out in the original tip, if M&S’s recovery really can’t get any momentum behind it, then there’s surely scope for an activist investor to start pressing the board to split the group. With M&S’s deal with online grocery specialist Ocado coming to fruition this year, the shedding or shrinking of the troubled clothing and homeware units might be the best turnaround plan of all.
It’s a useful reminder that buying shares in troubled companies in the hope that they can turn themselves around is always a tricky business. If you’d rather stick to companies with more solid foundations, then turn to our cover story, where Stephen Connolly picks ten of his favourite high-quality European stocks that could be well placed to catch up with their more highly-valued peers in the US this year.
Elsewhere in the magazine, Max King looks at three of the biggest investment themes in the UK’s commercial property market right now. Student housing, healthcare premises, and self-storage are all booming, and for good reason – but have valuations been driven too high? Read his verdict in this week's magazine.
And for the truly adventurous investor, David Stevenson looks at a new exchange-traded fund (ETF) that enables investors to gain access to one of the most intriguing and controversial sectors around right now – the cannabis industry. That industry has already been through one boom and bust, but I’m quite sure that there will be plenty more ups and downs to come. Not unlike the rather less exotic M&S.
Sign up to Money Morning
Our team, led by award winning editors, is dedicated to delivering you the top news, analysis, and guides to help you manage your money, grow your investments and build wealth.
John Stepek is a senior reporter at Bloomberg News and a former editor of MoneyWeek magazine. He graduated from Strathclyde University with a degree in psychology in 1996 and has always been fascinated by the gap between the way the market works in theory and the way it works in practice, and by how our deep-rooted instincts work against our best interests as investors.
He started out in journalism by writing articles about the specific business challenges facing family firms. In 2003, he took a job on the finance desk of Teletext, where he spent two years covering the markets and breaking financial news.
His work has been published in Families in Business, Shares magazine, Spear's Magazine, The Sunday Times, and The Spectator among others. He has also appeared as an expert commentator on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, BBC Radio Scotland, Newsnight, Daily Politics and Bloomberg. His first book, on contrarian investing, The Sceptical Investor, was released in March 2019. You can follow John on Twitter at @john_stepek.
-
Top global fintech companies to invest in
One British fintech hogs the headlines, but there are two top performers in the US. We explain where you should put your money
By David C. Stevenson Published
-
Japan’s new PM Shigeru Ishiba calls snap election – why now?
The new leader, Shigeru Ishiba, has called a snap election seeking a new mandate just three days into his post. What does this mean for the country's economy?
By Emily Hohler Published
-
The dangers of derivatives as the “Goldilocks era” ends
Editor's letter This is no longer a benign environment for investors, says Andrew Van Sickle. But – as the recent pension-fund derivatives blow-up shows – not everybody seems to have grasped that.
By Andrew Van Sickle Published
-
What to do as the age of cheap money and overpriced equities ends
Editor's letter The age of cheap money, overpriced equities and negative interest rates is over. The great bond bull market is over. All this means you will be losing money, says Merryn Somerset Webb. What can you do to protect yourself?
By Merryn Somerset Webb Published
-
Investors are bullish – but be very careful
Editor's letter Many investors are buying the dip, convinced the latest upswing is the start of a new bull market. The odds are that it’s not, says Andrew Van Sickle. The bear has unfinished business.
By Andrew Van Sickle Published
-
The MoneyWeek approach to investing
Editor's letter At MoneyWeek, our aim is simple: to give you intelligent and enjoyable commentary on the most important financial stories, and tell you how to profit from them. So how do we do that?
By Merryn Somerset Webb Published
-
Celebrity bitcoin ads echo the subprime mortgage crisis
Editor's letter A wave of ads featuring celebrities punting crypto to the masses are reminiscent of how low income Americans were encouraged to take on loans they couldn’t afford, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
By Merryn Somerset Webb Published
-
Will the UK's property slowdown turn into a house-price crash?
Editor's letter As the cost-of-living crisis intensifies and interest rate rise, it is hard to see reasons for UK house prices to keep rising, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
By Merryn Somerset Webb Published
-
What sardines can teach investors about today's markets
Editor's letter A California tale of “eating sardines” and “trading sardines” can help us divide investments into speculative and real, says Merryn Somerset Webb. Something that's very useful when looking at today’s markets.
By Merryn Somerset Webb Published
-
The market finally seems to be getting it
Editor's letter Reality checks are coming fast to the markets, says Merryn Somerset Webb – with even 2022’s safe havens beginning to reflect recession worries.
By Merryn Somerset Webb Published