Mining analyst Mark Turner, who writes the IKN Weekly, a newsletter focused on mining in South America, recently told his subscribers in no uncertain terms to cut their exposure to Peru.
“Sell Peru”, he said. It is, as far as mining investment is concerned, “off the map”. In fact, he went as far as to recommend shorting mining companies with significant exposure to Peru.
The reason? “Resource nationalism is coming to South America.”
Start your trial of MoneyWeek today
Get unparalleled financial insight, analysis and expert opinion you can profit from.
Start your trial
Sign up for MoneyWeek’s free twice-daily newsletter.
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Turner knows what he’s talking about. He’s at the coalface. He lives in Lima.
Latest Videos FromMoneyWeek
Politics could hit the supply of copper
Peru’s elections are a drawn-out process and the deciding vote comes in June. Socialist Pedro Castillo is the front runner and he is promising supertaxes of as much as 70% on mining profits in a bid to stop foreign firms “looting”, as he puts it, the country’s mining wealth.
The consequences are predictable. International companies will halt expenditure on both exploration and development. Why would they do anything else, if there is no reward for them? This means job losses for locals. What’s more, companies will reduce production, so as to leave metal in the ground until a new, more mining-friendly president comes to power. Which means diminished supply.
Peru is the world’s second largest producer, after Chile. It produced 2.2 million tonnes of copper last year, roughly 12% of annual supply. But it doesn’t look like it is going to be the world’s second largest producer for much longer.
Meanwhile, Reuters reports that Chile, which produced 5.7 million tonnes, “saw output of the red metal fall for the tenth consecutive month in March, marking a modest but continual slide in production that began shortly after the coronavirus pandemic struck the country.” Year on year production has fallen by just over 2%.
The world’s next largest producer is China, on roughly 1.6 million tonnes. Yet China is a net importer. That’s an understatement: it’s on a copper buying spree. It imported over a million tonnes more refined copper in 2020 than in 2019, and rumours of state stockpiling abound. China’s internal production can’t even meet its own internal demand, let alone what it needs for its exports’ manufacture. Between 2005 and 2020 China invested over $56bn securing overseas copper assets.
China alone accounts for over half of world copper demand, followed by Europe, then the US and Russia.
The “green revolution” will consume a lot of copper
Copper is in a runaway bull market. Demand is everywhere. Back in 2017 the World Bank was forecasting demand increases of at least 50% over the next 20 years. If the world moves towards a low-carbon energy future, then demand could rise tenfold by 2050, it claimed. Tenfold! The cause, irony of ironies, is the green energy revolution.
In terms of metal demand, this revolution is anything but green. There is an immense, underappreciated materials intensity to green energy consumption in its many forms, of which copper is a major constituent. Alternative energy systems are on average five times more copper intensive, reports the Baker Institute Center for Energy Studies in Forbes, than their conventional counterparts.
Every 1,000 battery electric vehicles (BEVs) require 83 tonnes of copper – three times the amount needed by old-school motor cars. Wind turbines require 3.6 tonnes of copper per megawatt (MW) of output and photovoltaic cells four to five tonnes per MW.
30,000 BEVs can consume as much copper as a skyscraper. For the global passenger vehicle fleet to be one-third BEV would mean 300 million BEVs, or 20 million tonnes of copper. That figure is roughly equivalent to annual global copper demand. Never mind all the plumbing, wiring, weatherproofing, machinery, electricals, electronics and multiplicity of other applications that require copper.
And one forgets there are other countries in the world that use copper. It’s not just China.
All this adds up to one thing: a copper bull market
Is the green energy revolution narrative suddenly going to go away? I doubt it very much – views are too entrenched. It might be that an extraordinarily high copper price will change the narrative and the case for fossil fuels will get stronger. It might be that an overwhelming case is made that, because of the extraordinary metal demand and the fossil fuels required to meet that demand, green energy is not quite that green after all. I can see the argument being made – it is already being made – but I can’t see it catching on. In other words, copper demand is not going away.
It all looks very bullish. This is a bull market of the secular variety, it seems.
Copper slipped below $2/lb in March last year. For the chartists out there, it formed a wonderful five-year double bottom with the lows of early 2016. It’s since made its way steadily up and today sits around $4.50/lb. It closed April at the exact price, almost to the penny, that it closed ten years earlier, at the peak of its last bull market, in April 2011.
It could be that we form a multi-year double top, and that it pulls back from this incredibly historically sensitive price point, after what has been a bonanza year.
But the momentum is up. Demand is escalating. Supply looks like it is coming under pressure. And once it breaks above its 2011 highs, what can I say? Look out above.
