The rise of passive investing is making markets “less efficient and more fragile”, says Tom Stevenson in The Telegraph. Somewhere between a third and half of equity assets under management are now passive, meaning they are held by funds seeking to track market indexes without trying to beat them. Passive investing offers lower fund manager fees than the active variety.
The problem? Too much passive investing makes for less discerning capital allocation, with money blindly pouring into markets according to “fund flows” and “weightings”. Share prices are thus prone to becoming disconnected from reality – although more inefficient markets do at least open the way for active stock pickers to spot mispricing opportunities and scoop up bargains.
Are ETFs following?
A new generation of actively managed exchange-traded funds (ETFs) is trying to do just that, says The Economist. Inflows into “active” ETFs have surged from less than $5 billion in 2019 to over $100 billion last year. Investors should be wary. ETFs have revolutionised markets.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
But active ETFs are undoing that progress, charging high fees in exchange for complicated promises of “volatility protection”, or exposure to illiquid assets in private equity and debt. They are usually a “rip-off”. Another popular trend is “thematic” ETFs, which let investors play everything from pet care to Chinese cloud computing, says James Mackintosh in The Wall Street Journal. But the approach is failing.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has dominated markets for most of this year, yet AI-themed ETFs have actually underperformed the US and global stock benchmarks (you would have done better by just buying Nvidia). Three AI ETFs even managed to shed value in 2024 – picking the right theme at the right time and still losing money must be “galling”.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
-
BT cuts annual revenue forecast – what's next for the telecoms giant?BT has trimmed its sales forecast, but the overall outlook remains positive and big investors have bought in. Should you invest?
-
Investing in a dangerous world: key takeaways from the MoneyWeek SummitIf you couldn’t get a ticket to MoneyWeek’s summit, here’s an overview of what you missed
-
DCC: a top-notch company going cheapDCC has a stellar long-term record and promising prospects. It has been unfairly marked down
-
Investment trusts could benefit from more optimismGive yourself an edge with investment trusts. Finding winning stocks is no mean feat.
-
How investors can use options to navigate a turbulent worldExplainer Options can be a useful solution for investors to protect and grow their wealth in volatile times.
-
Why the MoneyWeek ETF portfolio won't need to changeOur long-running ETF strategy won’t be placing any bets yet about what Donald Trump will do in his new term
-
Oil sector off the boil: what happens now?Oil giants BP and Shell are starting to struggle amid a glut of black gold. And growth in demand looks likely to slow
-
Invest in Hilton Foods: a tasty UK food supplierHilton Foods is a keenly priced opportunity in an unglamorous sector
