The US election has witnessed more political violence, just how ugly could it get?
Donald Trump is at the center of the US election yet again, but not for good reason. Will there be a peaceful handover of power in 2025?
“As if there hadn’t been enough drama in America, Donald Trump has survived another assassination attempt,” says Freddy Gray in The Spectator. The attempted killing of the former president at his golf course “was not nearly as threatening or deadly as the shooting nine weeks ago in Butler, Pennsylvania”, but it could still prove to be a “major moment” in the presidential campaign. It will remind voters of his “narrow escape” in Pennsylvania and of the fact that there are people who still want him dead, which might boost support among his backers and the undecided.
Trump won sympathy for his “conciliatory” tone after the shooting in July, says Rozina Sabur in The Telegraph. But this time he has said that Kamala Harris and Joe Biden’s rhetoric are to blame for creating an atmosphere of hatred and distrust. This is ironic coming from Trump, who is known for his ad hominem attacks on his opponents, but it’s also a “strategic error”. His claim may resonate with his ardent supporters, but it risks alienating the moderate swing voters who Trump must reach if he is to prevail in November.
What are the chances of a post-election war?
Let’s just be thankful he escaped unharmed, says Simon Tisdall in The Guardian. If Trump had been killed or suffered serious injury, that would not only be a personal tragedy for him and his family but would also throw the November presidential election into “utter confusion” and probably lead to “violent disorder”. The fringes of American society are now “sick with gun violence, schism and hate” and there are “real, justified fears” for the safety of Trump and J.D. Vance, as well as for Harris, Biden and Tim Walz.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
The “obvious but chilling possibility” that a candidate in the US presidential election could be seriously harmed or even killed isn’t the only concerning aspect of this election, says Daniel Finkelstein in The Times.
A few past elections, most notably in 1960 and 2000, have ended up with the losing candidate coming close enough to consider contesting the result. In the 2000 election, Al Gore eventually accepted the decision of the Supreme Court to stop the recount and honourably conceded. Richard Nixon did the same in 1960. But can anyone imagine that happening after this election? A result as close as that of 2000 is possible, but it’s hard to see either Trump or the Democrats gracefully accepting a loss.
How ugly could it get? The signs are not good, says The Economist. Even without Trump on the ballot paper, US elections are “drawn out and complex”, and “tend to invite legal challenges”. They “demand patience and trust”. Yet those qualities are in ever shorter supply in today’s America, a situation not helped by Trump’s claim that the last election was stolen from him.
Polls suggest the result will be tight, and Trump and his party are “gearing up to wage the post-election war a second time”. Worryingly, about 20% of American adults say they are open to the possibility of using violence for political ends. America will still see a peaceful transfer of power in 2025. But that is “a minimal definition of democratic success”. Voters need to believe that the process is fair and can be trusted, and accept the result.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
Related stories
-
Hargreaves Lansdown shakes up fees in biggest change in 10 years – what does it mean for you?Hargreaves Lansdown is lowering its headline fee from 0.45% to 0.35% – but not everyone will be happy with the new fee structure, it’s been suggested.
-
Michael Moritz: The richest Welshman to walk the EarthMichael Moritz started out as a journalist before catching the eye of a Silicon Valley titan. He finds Donald Trump to be “an absurd buffoon”
-
What turns a stock market crash into a financial crisis?Opinion Professor Linda Yueh's popular book on major stock market crashes misses key lessons, says Max King
-
ISA reforms will destroy the last relic of the Thatcher eraOpinion With the ISA under attack, the Labour government has now started to destroy the last relic of the Thatcher era, returning the economy to the dysfunctional 1970s
-
Nobel laureate Philippe Aghion reveals the key to GDP growthInterview According to Nobel laureate Philippe Aghion, competition is the key to innovation, productivity and growth – here's what this implies for Europe and Britain
-
'Investors should brace for Trump’s great inflation'Opinion Donald Trump's actions against Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell will likely stoke rising prices. Investors should prepare for the worst, says Matthew Lynn
-
The state of Iran’s collapsing economy – and why people are protestingIran has long been mired in an economic crisis that is part of a wider systemic failure. Do the protests show a way out?
-
Hiring new staff for your business? Help is availableHiring more employees is a costly business, but help is available from the government, says David Prosser
-
'Expect more policy U-turns from Keir Starmer'Opinion Keir Starmer’s government quickly changes its mind as soon as it runs into any opposition. It isn't hard to work out where the next U-turns will come from
-
Why does Donald Trump want Venezuela's oil?The US has seized control of Venezuelan oil. Why and to what end?
