The US election has witnessed more political violence, just how ugly could it get?
Donald Trump is at the center of the US election yet again, but not for good reason. Will there be a peaceful handover of power in 2025?
“As if there hadn’t been enough drama in America, Donald Trump has survived another assassination attempt,” says Freddy Gray in The Spectator. The attempted killing of the former president at his golf course “was not nearly as threatening or deadly as the shooting nine weeks ago in Butler, Pennsylvania”, but it could still prove to be a “major moment” in the presidential campaign. It will remind voters of his “narrow escape” in Pennsylvania and of the fact that there are people who still want him dead, which might boost support among his backers and the undecided.
Trump won sympathy for his “conciliatory” tone after the shooting in July, says Rozina Sabur in The Telegraph. But this time he has said that Kamala Harris and Joe Biden’s rhetoric are to blame for creating an atmosphere of hatred and distrust. This is ironic coming from Trump, who is known for his ad hominem attacks on his opponents, but it’s also a “strategic error”. His claim may resonate with his ardent supporters, but it risks alienating the moderate swing voters who Trump must reach if he is to prevail in November.
What are the chances of a post-election war?
Let’s just be thankful he escaped unharmed, says Simon Tisdall in The Guardian. If Trump had been killed or suffered serious injury, that would not only be a personal tragedy for him and his family but would also throw the November presidential election into “utter confusion” and probably lead to “violent disorder”. The fringes of American society are now “sick with gun violence, schism and hate” and there are “real, justified fears” for the safety of Trump and J.D. Vance, as well as for Harris, Biden and Tim Walz.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
The “obvious but chilling possibility” that a candidate in the US presidential election could be seriously harmed or even killed isn’t the only concerning aspect of this election, says Daniel Finkelstein in The Times.
A few past elections, most notably in 1960 and 2000, have ended up with the losing candidate coming close enough to consider contesting the result. In the 2000 election, Al Gore eventually accepted the decision of the Supreme Court to stop the recount and honourably conceded. Richard Nixon did the same in 1960. But can anyone imagine that happening after this election? A result as close as that of 2000 is possible, but it’s hard to see either Trump or the Democrats gracefully accepting a loss.
How ugly could it get? The signs are not good, says The Economist. Even without Trump on the ballot paper, US elections are “drawn out and complex”, and “tend to invite legal challenges”. They “demand patience and trust”. Yet those qualities are in ever shorter supply in today’s America, a situation not helped by Trump’s claim that the last election was stolen from him.
Polls suggest the result will be tight, and Trump and his party are “gearing up to wage the post-election war a second time”. Worryingly, about 20% of American adults say they are open to the possibility of using violence for political ends. America will still see a peaceful transfer of power in 2025. But that is “a minimal definition of democratic success”. Voters need to believe that the process is fair and can be trusted, and accept the result.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
Related stories
-
UK sets out crypto regulatory proposalsThe government has tabled legislation that sets out a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, while the regulator will consult on balancing innovation and consumer protections
-
What does an interest rate cut mean for my pension?Interest rates have been cut from 4% to 3.75%. For pension savers and retirees the effects of the drop will depend on the type of retirement pot they have, but could be significant.
-
Renewable energy funds are stuck between a ROC and a hard placeRenewable energy funds were hit hard by the government’s subsidy changes, but they have only themselves to blame for their failure to build trust with investors
-
The war dividend – how to invest in defence stocks as the world arms upWestern governments are back on a war footing. Investors should be prepared, too, says Jamie Ward
-
Did COP30 achieve anything to tackle climate change?The COP30 summit was a failure. But the world is going green regardless, says Simon Wilson
-
Rachel Reeves's punishing rise in business rates will crush the British economyOpinion By piling more and more stealth taxes onto businesses, the government is repeating exactly the same mistake of its first Budget, says Matthew Lynn
-
Leading European companies offer long-term growth prospectsOpinion Alexander Darwall, lead portfolio manager, European Opportunities Trust, picks three European companies where he'd put his money
-
How to capitalise on the pessimism around Britain's stock marketOpinion There was little in the Budget to prop up Britain's stock market, but opportunities are hiding in plain sight. Investors should take advantage while they can
-
London claims victory in the Brexit warsOpinion JPMorgan Chase's decision to build a new headquarters in London is a huge vote of confidence and a sign that the City will remain Europe's key financial hub
-
The consequences of the Autumn Budget – and what it means for the UK economyOpinion A directionless and floundering government has ducked the hard choices at the Autumn Budget, says Simon Wilson
