The days of six-days-a-week postal deliveries to all 32 million addresses across the UK are looking more shaky than ever after the communications regulator Ofcom unveiled its proposals for Royal Mail reform.
The number of letters we send each year has slumped from 20 billion two decades ago to just seven billion now and is predicted to shrink further. That means the Royal Mail’s commitment to “universal service” is “getting out of date and will become unsustainable if we don’t take action”, according to Ofcom boss Melanie Dawes.
The options proposed by the regulator include cutting delivery days from six to five (scrapping Saturday deliveries) or even three; or changing the model entirely by merging first and second class into a new, slower service, but with a super-premium charge for urgent next-day delivery.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Who owns Royal Mail?
Royal Mail Group Ltd, trading as Royal Mail, is a subsidiary of International Distributions Services, a stock market listed holding company that also owns Parcelforce Worldwide and GLS Group, which operates in Europe and North America.
For most of its history, it was a public service, but it was privatised by the coalition government in 2013, having been legally separated from the Post Office the year before.
The government kept a 30% stake in Royal Mail, but sold its remaining shares (at a profit) in 2015, ending 499 years of state ownership. Then, in 2022, Royal Mail changed its name to the unlovely International Distributions Services.
How has Royal Mail done as a business?
Overall, it’s lost its shareholders money. The initial float price was 330p, a significant under-pricing: it closed at 455p on the opening day. The peak price, in 2018, was above 630p, and it nearly hit the 600p mark again in 2021.
But it’s currently trading at less than half that, around 276p, and is worth less now than at IPO.
As such, many commentators would accuse it of “squandering the financial legacy it was bequeathed at privatisation”, says Andrew Ellison in The Times.
When it was flogged off, the government sweetened the deal for investors by relieving Royal Mail of nearly $40billion in pension obligations and gifting it ownership of public property worth hundreds of millions of pounds.
Since 2013, the firm has sold land worth at least £415million. Critics accuse it of not investing enough in transforming the business to take advantage of the boom in internet shopping and parcel deliveries.
Meanwhile, the company has paid out nearly £2billion in dividends since 2013, and in 2022 it spent more than £200million on buying its own shares in the hope of propping up the price.
Is Royal Mail failing financially?
Under the terms of its deal with the government, Royal Mail – which reported losses of £169million in the first half of its financial year – is required to deliver 93% of first-class post the next working day, and 98.5% of second-class within three days. But in 2022-23 it managed only 73.7% on the first-class metric, and 90.7% on the second class – earning it a £5.6million fine.
According to the company’s chairman, Keith Williams, the core issue is the slump in volume.
On average, Royal Mail now delivers only about four letters per address each week. The crucial factor, largely unspoken, is that the universal service obligation makes it hard to cut the gigantic staff costs of £5billion for 150,000 people.
Without reform of the regulatory system, or a subsidy, “we are stuck in a vicious spiral leading to heavy losses and an unsustainable service”, says Williams – who is paid £311,000 a year for a commitment of at least two days a week. He also chairs Halfords. Most comparable countries ended the universal guarantee years ago, he says. It’s time to do the same here.
Postal services in Europe: are they any better?
Currently, the only two nations in Europe with a six-day-a-week next-day letter service are the UK and Malta.
In Malta, it costs 50p, compared with £1.25 here (following years of hefty above-inflation rises), but then this country is 771 times the size of the island statelet.
In France, the state-backed La Poste cut its service levels last year. Letter deliveries that took two days to arrive were switched to three, and a hybrid “e-letter” format was introduced for urgent delivery: customers type their letter online, and it then gets printed out close to its destination and delivered overnight.
Germany is easing its regulatory requirements in a way that in effect ends guaranteed next-day deliveries.
And Denmark, which has been pushing people online for all official communications since 2012, now has the most limited service in Europe, with deliveries just one day a week.
Next steps for Royal Mail
Two of Ofcom’s options were slapped down before they were even published. Rishi Sunak made clear he “will not countenance” scrapping postal deliveries on Saturdays (in part due to the impact on businesses, including publishers).
So if the five-day and three-day options are non-starters for now, that leaves Ofcom’s “snail mail” proposal, says Nils Pratley in The Guardian: making the bulk of deliveries a standard service that takes “up to three days or longer”, plus an expensive premium service for next-day delivery.
But customers “should be deeply suspicious” of this “slow-plus premium” model, which might just mean a much slower second-class service and a vastly more expensive first-class one.
The commitment to three days “or longer” is as vague as it gets. And Ofcom’s enormously wide estimate of the savings to Royal Mail – anything from £150million to £650million – suggests a sketchy plan with very loose costings.
Five-days-a-week delivery would yield savings of £100million-£200million, and could be the “least bad compromise”.
Ofcom’s public consultation runs until 3 April 2024, with decisions due “in the summer”.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
-
What will the unravelling of US-China trade mean for the economy?What will a US-China decoupling mean for the global economy?
-
Scottish Mortgage: why we’re turning to private companies and China for exceptional returnsWhen it comes to delivering growth, Scottish Mortgage will stop at no end in its hunt for exceptional long-term returns - this includes China, unicorn companies and sectors such as space exploration
-
Why did the government take over British Steel – and was it a good idea?The government has stepped in to take control, not ownership, of British Steel, citing national security and other factors. But does that make sense?
-
'Rachel Reeves' plan to force pension funds into UK assets won't work'Opinion Hustling pension fund cash into British assets sounds like a good idea. It would be better to make Britain an attractive place to invest, says Matthew Lynn
-
What caused the Birmingham bin strike – and what does it mean for British businesses?The Birmingham bin strike is the fallout from an equal-pay claim brought by female cleaners. That bodes ill for the rest of British business
-
Supersonic travel: How China could 'leapfrog' US and Europe's commercial aviation industryOpinion Innovation in commercial aviation has been stuck for 60 years. A commercial supersonic jet might be back on the market soon, but will China get there first?
-
How British businesses can tackle Trump's tariffsThe majority of British businesses are likely to take a hit from the chaos caused by Trump’s tariffs to reorder global trade. Companies in the firing line face some difficult decisions, says David Prosser
-
Trump wants to colonise Mars – will it happen?Donald Trump wants to plant the US flag on Mars. Could humans really live there?
-
A new wealth tax is a terrible idea. The rich are already being hit by sneaky taxes – Merryn Somerset WebbOpinion Ideologues want to squeeze more tax out of the rich with a wealth tax. They’re already wrung dry, says Merryn Somerset Webb
-
Why are energy bills so expensive in the UK?Electricity bills in the UK are higher than in any comparable rich country. Some blame the net-zero zealotry of the government for that. What is really to blame for high energy bills?
