Plenty more Brexit arguments to be settled yet
Many important negotiations remain to be sealed in our deal with the EU. “No deal is better than a bad deal” is the way to play it, says Matthew Lynn
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Twice daily
MoneyWeek
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Four times a week
Look After My Bills
Sign up to our free money-saving newsletter, filled with the latest news and expert advice to help you find the best tips and deals for managing your bills. Start saving today!
We thought it was all over. After years of wrangling, stand-offs, walk-outs and arguments, the UK and the EU finally reached a trade deal just before Christmas, and with only days remaining before the transitional arrangement expired at the end of the old year. And yet, just when you thought we could safely forget about wrangling with Michel Barnier, it turns out the arguments are set to continue.
Talks will start this week between the UK and the EU over a deal for financial services. There will inevitably be lots of pressure to make concessions and secure access to the European market for the UK’s banks, insurers and asset managers. That should be resisted. In truth, the same hardball “no deal is better than a bad deal” stance will work as well for the City as it did for the rest of the country.
Playing hardball makes sense
Over the next couple of months, British officials will have to try and negotiate “equivalence” rules that will allow City firms to sell their services across the EU. That matters a lot. Financial services are one of the UK’s largest exports industries, and one of the most lucrative. The EU market has been hugely important, allowing the City to become the dominant financial centre for the whole of the continent. There can be no argument that losing access to that market would come as a huge blow.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
It is not going to be easy to strike a deal. Plenty of European countries are suspicious of the UK’s role in finance. The French, Germans and, increasingly, the Italians as well, would like a share of that trade. Many of them will be uneasy about the main trading and debt centre for the euro being outside their regulatory control. Plenty of them will calculate they should make life as hard for the UK as possible, not least because it will increase the chances of banks relocating to mainland Europe.
At the same time, many City banks, lobbyists and asset managers will be desperate to secure access to the single market, and they will be urging the government to make whatever concessions are necessary to secure it. We can expect to see lots of scare stories about the huge losses the UK economy will face if it doesn’t reach a deal. The trouble is, we could easily find our finance industry essentially regulated from Brussels forever. The City should instead back the UK’s negotiators to be robust and ready to walk away without a deal if they have to. Here’s why.
First, the strategy works well. The EU is not as powerful as it pretends to be, or as its more enthusiastic supporters claim. Sure, it is an important market for British financial firms. But it also depends on the City to raise the vast amounts of debt that eurozone governments and companies need. In the main negotiations, the EU became a lot more willing to compromise as soon as the British government made it clear it would walk away without a deal if it had to. The same will be true for financial services.
Europe is not the only game in town
Second, there are plenty of markets outside the EU where the City can grow instead. The eurozone accounts for 16% of the global economy, and with slower growth, and accelerating development in Asia and Africa, that is getting smaller all the time. The City has always done best as a global finance hub rather than as merely a domestic or regional one. It might well lose some business over the next few years to Paris, Frankfurt and Amsterdam. But it can more than make up for that by expanding across the rest of the world. As an offshore, lightly regulated hub straddling time zones, and connecting Europe to the rest of the world, it might well find it can do a lot better than it ever did inside the EU.
It is important that the City gets these negotiations right. The City is one of the most important sectors of the British economy. The last thing we need is to commit ourselves to an EU rule book that will be hostile to artificial intelligence, robot trading, app-based insurance and banking, and all the other new technologies that should turbocharge the finance industry over the next decade.
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.

Matthew Lynn is a columnist for Bloomberg and writes weekly commentary syndicated in papers such as the Daily Telegraph, Die Welt, the Sydney Morning Herald, the South China Morning Post and the Miami Herald. He is also an associate editor of Spectator Business, and a regular contributor to The Spectator. Before that, he worked for the business section of the Sunday Times for ten years.
-
How a ‘great view’ from your home can boost its value by 35%A house that comes with a picturesque backdrop could add tens of thousands of pounds to its asking price – but how does each region compare?
-
What is a care fees annuity and how much does it cost?How we will be cared for in our later years – and how much we are willing to pay for it – are conversations best had as early as possible. One option to cover the cost is a care fees annuity. We look at the pros and cons.
-
"Botched" Brexit: should Britain rejoin the EU?Brexit did not go perfectly nor disastrously. It’s not worth continuing the fight over the issue, says Julian Jessop
-
'AI is the real deal – it will change our world in more ways than we can imagine'Interview Rob Arnott of Research Affiliates talks to Andrew Van Sickle about the AI bubble, the impact of tariffs on inflation and the outlook for gold and China
-
Tony Blair's terrible legacy sees Britain still sufferingOpinion Max King highlights ten ways in which Tony Blair's government sowed the seeds of Britain’s subsequent poor performance and many of its current problems
-
How a dovish Federal Reserve could affect youTrump’s pick for the US Federal Reserve is not so much of a yes-man as his rival, but interest rates will still come down quickly, says Cris Sholto Heaton
-
New Federal Reserve chair Kevin Warsh has his work cut outOpinion Kevin Warsh must make it clear that he, not Trump, is in charge at the Fed. If he doesn't, the US dollar and Treasury bills sell-off will start all over again
-
How Canada's Mark Carney is taking on Donald TrumpCanada has been in Donald Trump’s crosshairs ever since he took power and, under PM Mark Carney, is seeking strategies to cope and thrive. How’s he doing?
-
Rachel Reeves is rediscovering the Laffer curveOpinion If you keep raising taxes, at some point, you start to bring in less revenue. Rachel Reeves has shown the way, says Matthew Lynn
-
The enshittification of the internet and what it means for usWhy do transformative digital technologies start out as useful tools but then gradually get worse and worse? There is a reason for it – but is there a way out?