Is there a glut of oil on the way? It doesn’t feel like it at the moment. Years of well meaning lack of investment into fossil fuels have tightened the market (the effect being similar to that of the Opec crisis in the early 1970s) and most analysts are now assuming the supply and demand mismatch will last for some years to come. But is this just to make yet another extrapolation mistake?
In most commodity markets, the cure for high prices is high prices – and there is no reason to think this will be any different, says Max King in this week's magazine. Already, governments and investors are busily backtracking on their opposition to fossil-fuel investment and there is likely be a “significant supply response” from Opec, the US (shale) and Venezuela. This time next year and it may be that the £100 tank of petrol is nothing but a distant nightmare, something that could solve a lot of our problems.
The real causes of inflation
Not everyone is convinced by this. Barry Norris points out that investment in the search for new oil and gas reserves is down 66% on a decade ago, and in this week’s podcast Charles Schwab’s Liz Ann Sonders notes that the environmental, social and governance (ESG) agenda is very much at odds with support for fossil-fuel exploration.
Try 6 free issues of MoneyWeek today
Get unparalleled financial insight, analysis and expert opinion you can profit from.
Start your trial
Sign up for MoneyWeek’s free twice-daily newsletter.
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
It also may not make the definitive difference the optimists think. The truth is that much as it suits politicians and central bankers to blame inflation on oil prices – and to claim oil prices are only up as a result of war in Ukraine – inflation is caused by governments. But inflation is really the result of politicians “trying to do too much too quickly”, says Andrew McNally of Equitile investments (quoting a 1974 speech from Keith Joseph, later Margaret Thatcher’s head of policy), creating and spending far too much money in the process.
Latest Videos FromMoneyWeek
This happened in the run up to 1974 when governments (terrified that they may again see the mass unemployment of the 1930s) tried to spend their way out of their problems. Government spending relative to GDP is at a historic high in the UK (albeit not quite as high as it is in many of our EU neighbours) and “higher inflation always follows higher spending”.
Our government is once again trying to do too much (see Matthew Lynn's column this week on why borrowing your way out of a crisis rarely works) and doing so while also enacting policies that are hugely destructive to the private sector – think lockdowns, the green agenda and the relentless rise of regulation.
Getting a grip on government
Note that the number of people working in the civil service is up 24% since 2016. The state is too big; it costs too much – and at some point it will be clear that it is crowding out the private sector. Not much long-term good can come of this. Oil prices may or may not self-correct, but unless governments get a grip, stagflation – and its nasty effects on our wealth and our living standards – will not.
MoneyWeek is in (fairly) rare agreement with The Economist on this matter: it is time for the UK to start making a few more of the hard choices that lead to long-term wealth and fewer of the feel-good ones that have got us where we are today. Markets like this kind of thing: by the end of the 1970s £100 invested at the top of the market was worth only £61 in real terms. By the end of the 1980s (after some work from Thatcher and Joseph) it was worth £261.
