Quantitative easing: too much of a good thing
The Bank of England is addicted to quantitative easing (QE), the House of Lords has warned. What does that mean for investors?

When the developed world’s central banks resorted to quantitative easing (QE) after the 2008 global financial crisis, most of us were shocked. While QE was not entirely new, the idea of central banks printing money at scale to buy government bonds seemed an extraordinarily radical, not to mention risky step. Today, it’s just another part of the toolbox. QE has been used in various forms across most developed nations in the decade since the banking crisis, so when it was deployed in vast quantities during the pandemic, no one batted an eyelid. But a new report from the House of Lords’ Economic Affairs Committee suggests that this widespread complacency is a problem. In short, QE has become “a dangerous addiction”, to quote the report’s title, with a particular focus on its use during the pandemic.
The big problems with QE
So why the concern? Mervyn King – who headed the Bank of England when QE was used in 2009 – sums up the report’s main findings for Bloomberg. First, central banks risk appearing too relaxed about inflation. They say that price rises are “transitory”, but it’s not clear why this is the case, or what they would do if inflation turns out not to be transitory (eg, raise rates, or drain the QE first?). Second, QE is too readily used – it “has become a universal remedy for almost any macroeconomic setback”. The 2020 pandemic was very different in nature to the banking crisis – yet central banks reached for the same solution.
Third, given the scale of recent QE and the simultaneous increase in government spending, central banks risk compromising their independence and credibility as they come under pressure from governments to keep funding national budget deficits. Finally, central banks have no clear strategy on how to unwind QE, or even if it can be unwound. Already the assets bought by the Bank of England under QE are worth 40% of UK GDP, so this question is hardly just theoretical. The report also nods to QE’s impact on wealth inequality. It “artificially” boosts asset prices, benefiting their owners “disproportionately”. It is also sceptical about the usefulness of extending central bank mandates to include climate change.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
It’s all pretty damning, implying that central banks don’t really know what they’re doing. It’s also clear that the committee feels that QE now risks fuelling inflation. But what does it mean for investors? Probably nothing. None of these points is new (we’ve been making them for years). It might put more political pressure on the Bank of England to make a show of attending more to inflation. But as the report itself rather proves, central banks (and governments) have become dependent on QE. In the absence of a palatable alternative, it’s hard to see them going cold turkey.
Sign up for MoneyWeek's newsletters
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
John Stepek is a senior reporter at Bloomberg News and a former editor of MoneyWeek magazine. He graduated from Strathclyde University with a degree in psychology in 1996 and has always been fascinated by the gap between the way the market works in theory and the way it works in practice, and by how our deep-rooted instincts work against our best interests as investors.
He started out in journalism by writing articles about the specific business challenges facing family firms. In 2003, he took a job on the finance desk of Teletext, where he spent two years covering the markets and breaking financial news.
His work has been published in Families in Business, Shares magazine, Spear's Magazine, The Sunday Times, and The Spectator among others. He has also appeared as an expert commentator on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, BBC Radio Scotland, Newsnight, Daily Politics and Bloomberg. His first book, on contrarian investing, The Sceptical Investor, was released in March 2019. You can follow John on Twitter at @john_stepek.
-
Side hustle tax changes: HMRC reforms could save thousands from filing self-assessment tax returns
The government plans to raise the tax-free threshold for trading income – here is how it could help your side hustle
By Marc Shoffman Published
-
Return to the office: is working from home coming to an end?
More and more employers want their staff to return to the office. Is it a good idea?
By David Prosser Published
-
Is Rachel Reeves leading the UK to a spring crisis?
Opinion Rachel Reeves is sleepwalking into an economic catastrophe of her own making. Don’t expect a change of direction, says Matthew Lynn
By Matthew Lynn Published
-
Heathrow's third runway cleared for take-off – but will it boost growth?
Heathrow Airport will finally get its third runway but critics argue a bigger Heathrow isn't the answer to boosting growth.
By Simon Wilson Published
-
Labour is throttling business - a change of direction is needed, says Matthew Lynn
Opinion Will the last major global business to leave Britain please turn off the punishingly expensive lights?
By Matthew Lynn Published
-
Has inflation been tamed in the UK?
After a surprise drop in inflation, the Bank of England is set for more rate cuts in the year ahead. But investors are cautious about pricing in too many cuts
By Alex Rankine Published
-
Why is the UK's economic growth falling behind?
Poor economic growth and productivity in the UK is due to several factors that are our own fault, says David C. Stevenson
By David C. Stevenson Published
-
What does Rachel Reeves's visit to China mean for the UK?
The Chancellor faced severe criticism for her China visit amid financial market turmoil. But how important is reviving economic ties with China for Britain?
By Emily Hohler Published
-
Is the Office for National Statistics fit for purpose?
Britain’s statistics authority, the Office for National Statistics, is increasingly unfit for purpose. Why, and what can be done?
By Simon Wilson Published
-
Is there hope for the UK economy in 2025?
Analysis The UK economy's upswing we enjoyed in the first half of 2024 has petered out thanks to a darkening global backdrop and concern over burdens imposed by Labour, says Julian Jessop
By Julian Jessop Published