Should small business owners be worried about the Labour government’s plans to beef up workers’ rights? Not according to ministers, who have launched a charm offensive to soothe entrepreneurs’ fears. September saw Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner and Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds meet small business groups to discuss potential changes to the law.
We won’t know exactly what Labour is planning until it publishes its detailed proposals on how to “make work pay” – as it branded the reforms in the election campaign. An employment rights bill is expected in October. In the meantime, some likely changes are worrying employers more than others.
Small businesses: employment laws to watch
- Unfair dismissal: prior to the election, Labour said it wanted to give employees the right to claim for unfair dismissal from their first day of employment – currently, they have no such rights for two years. Employers worry they will be stuck with employees who turn out to be unsuitable for roles they have been hired for. That could prove particularly difficult for small businesses with fewer members of staff.
- Zero-hours contracts: a likely ban on zero-hours contracts is also a cause for concern. While such arrangements have undoubtedly been exploited by unscrupulous employers, small businesses argue they can provide agility that is especially useful to growing companies; they also point out that some employees are also looking for flexibility in their working hours.
- Sick pay rules: small businesses might also find new sick pay rules challenging. Currently, they don’t have to pay statutory sick pay to staff until they have been off work for more than three days. Labour has previously proposed changing the rules so that workers are eligible for sick pay from day one. This would cover many more absences than the current regime. Other rumoured changes to the law look set to require employers to work harder on consultations with staff, rather than introducing onerous or expensive new rights.
- Redundancy: an overhaul of the rules on redundancy consultations is expected, with employers required to launch formal consultation processes in much more wide-ranging situations. Similar rules are possible on consultations related to the TUPE regulations, which govern how employees must be treated if they are transferred from one employer to another (when a business is sold, for instance).
Similarly, a ban on “fire and rehire” – whereby an employer makes staff redundant and then rehires them with inferior pay and conditions – would force companies to negotiate with staff in order to make changes to their contracts.
Inevitably, employment lawyers point out, the devil will be in the details of all these proposals. Labour’s efforts to keep employers, including small businesses, onside in recent weeks suggests ministers are at least prepared to listen to concerns about the reforms. Changes to the law may be accompanied by flexibilities that leave employers with room for manoeuvre.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Nevertheless, small businesses need to be mindful of what is coming. It makes sense to review your current practices in light of the reforms to identify areas where there is potential conflict. Some employers already go further than the law requires – on sick-pay entitlement, for example – and will be less affected by new rules. For others, changes to the system may come as more of a shock.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
-
Two top Asia-focused investment trustsPacific Assets and Scottish Oriental are both trusts that focus on high-quality companies controlled by trustworthy families or founders
-
Anne Wojcicki: the daring 23andMe CEO who reached too farProfile Anne Wojcicki dreamed of a revolution in personal genomics and medicine and set up 23andMe in 2006. Its collapse into bankruptcy provides a cautionary tale
-
A new wealth tax is a terrible idea. The rich are already being hit by sneaky taxes – Merryn Somerset WebbOpinion Ideologues want to squeeze more tax out of the rich with a wealth tax. They’re already wrung dry, says Merryn Somerset Webb
-
Why are energy bills so expensive in the UK?Electricity bills in the UK are higher than in any comparable rich country. Some blame the net-zero zealotry of the government for that. What is really to blame for high energy bills?
-
Five years on: what did Covid cost us?We’re still counting the costs of the global coronavirus pandemic – and governments’ responses. What did we learn?
-
London can lure Brexit-fleeing banks back to UK – but the City must move quicklyOpinion Many banks fled to Paris in the wake of Brexit but are now in full-scale retreat. The City should move quickly to lure them back, says Matthew Lynn
-
Spring Statement: Rachel Reeves 'must turn good intentions into effective measures'Opinion Chancellor Rachel Reeves understands the economy’s structural problems but is unlikely to solve them, says Max King
-
England's department stores return – but do they have a future?Opinion The great traditional retail shops of Middle England have bounced back for now. Don’t get too carried away though, says Matthew Lynn
-
Labour's 'Project Chainsaw' begins by abolishing NHS England – will it backfire?Keir Starmer is taking the fight to the blockers, the NIMBYs, public sector workers and the unions says Emily Hohler. What happens if Labour fails to deliver?
-
Walgreens Boots Alliance sold to private equity firm - will Boots get the boot?US pharmacy giant Walgreens Boots Alliance is going private. Will the new owners sell off the high-street chemist?
