Should small business owners be worried about the Labour government’s plans to beef up workers’ rights? Not according to ministers, who have launched a charm offensive to soothe entrepreneurs’ fears. September saw Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner and Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds meet small business groups to discuss potential changes to the law.
We won’t know exactly what Labour is planning until it publishes its detailed proposals on how to “make work pay” – as it branded the reforms in the election campaign. An employment rights bill is expected in October. In the meantime, some likely changes are worrying employers more than others.
Small businesses: employment laws to watch
- Unfair dismissal: prior to the election, Labour said it wanted to give employees the right to claim for unfair dismissal from their first day of employment – currently, they have no such rights for two years. Employers worry they will be stuck with employees who turn out to be unsuitable for roles they have been hired for. That could prove particularly difficult for small businesses with fewer members of staff.
- Zero-hours contracts: a likely ban on zero-hours contracts is also a cause for concern. While such arrangements have undoubtedly been exploited by unscrupulous employers, small businesses argue they can provide agility that is especially useful to growing companies; they also point out that some employees are also looking for flexibility in their working hours.
- Sick pay rules: small businesses might also find new sick pay rules challenging. Currently, they don’t have to pay statutory sick pay to staff until they have been off work for more than three days. Labour has previously proposed changing the rules so that workers are eligible for sick pay from day one. This would cover many more absences than the current regime. Other rumoured changes to the law look set to require employers to work harder on consultations with staff, rather than introducing onerous or expensive new rights.
- Redundancy: an overhaul of the rules on redundancy consultations is expected, with employers required to launch formal consultation processes in much more wide-ranging situations. Similar rules are possible on consultations related to the TUPE regulations, which govern how employees must be treated if they are transferred from one employer to another (when a business is sold, for instance).
Similarly, a ban on “fire and rehire” – whereby an employer makes staff redundant and then rehires them with inferior pay and conditions – would force companies to negotiate with staff in order to make changes to their contracts.
Inevitably, employment lawyers point out, the devil will be in the details of all these proposals. Labour’s efforts to keep employers, including small businesses, onside in recent weeks suggests ministers are at least prepared to listen to concerns about the reforms. Changes to the law may be accompanied by flexibilities that leave employers with room for manoeuvre.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Nevertheless, small businesses need to be mindful of what is coming. It makes sense to review your current practices in light of the reforms to identify areas where there is potential conflict. Some employers already go further than the law requires – on sick-pay entitlement, for example – and will be less affected by new rules. For others, changes to the system may come as more of a shock.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
-
Investors pull money from UK equities as government warns of “painful” BudgetThe government’s post-election honeymoon period has been short-lived, and investors are shying away from UK equities as a result
-
Top global fintech companies to invest inOne British fintech hogs the headlines, but there are two top performers in the US. We explain where you should put your money
-
Why Labour sleaze mattersLabour has come under the spotlight for accepting over £800,000 in gifts. Is this just crony politics as usual?
-
How to improve economic output using the supply-side approachBoosting potential economic output through public investment is crucial, says David C. Stevenson
-
Anders Holch Povlsen: the Danish tycoon reshaping BritainAnders Holch Povlsen has snapped up land in the Highlands, returning it to a wilderness, and plans to transform a historic department store in Edinburgh. Can he also revive Topshop?
-
Will Topshop return to the UK high street?Despite Asos selling a £135 million stake in Topshop, is there a chance for the retailer to make a comeback on the high street?
-
London Stock Exchange exodus: which companies could be next to go?As many companies exit London, the steady trickle of stocks listing elsewhere could turn into a stampede. Who will be next, and what does this mean for investors?
-
“Fast-track justice” goes off the rails: is it time to rethink the system?Single Justice Procedures, or fast-track justice, designed to deal with minor offences, have become increasingly heavy-handed. Is it time for an overhaul?
-
M&S recovery has momentum: will it stick?After years of decline, M&S seems to have turned a corner. But is this just a “dead cat bounce”?
-
Ukraine invades Russia – what are the political implications?Ukraine's surprise invasion into Kursk could change the course of the war politically
