Should Joe Biden withdraw his candidacy?
After Joe Biden's presidential debate appearance on TV, it's left people asking if he's fit to run in the election
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Twice daily
MoneyWeek
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Four times a week
Look After My Bills
Sign up to our free money-saving newsletter, filled with the latest news and expert advice to help you find the best tips and deals for managing your bills. Start saving today!
Joe Biden met with Democratic governors recently as the president faces “increasingly concerning polls and growing calls to withdraw his candidacy” following a “calamitous debate performance” against Donald Trump, say Robert Tait and Sam Levin in The Guardian.
Biden has blamed his “garbled” and “low energy” performance on jet lag from international travel, but there are reportedly 25 Democratic members of the House of Representatives preparing to call for Biden to step aside, and one Texas congressman already demanding that he stand down. Polls suggest that one in three Democrats think Biden should go.
What would Joe Biden leaving mean for the Democrats?
Replacing Biden might not provide the electoral boost that Democrats are hoping for, says David Charter in The Times. Even the poll showing that many Democrats want him to quit revealed that no prominent elected Democrat would do any better against Trump, although former first lady Michelle Obama did have a large hypothetical lead. Interestingly, the poll also found that Biden’s “disastrous” and “stumbling” debate performance hadn’t harmed him as much as many think – Biden and Trump “remain neck and neck among all registered voters”.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
There is no good option now for Democrats, says Janan Ganesh in the Financial Times. If they choose someone else to run, they are essentially saying: “We tried our utmost to sneak an untenable candidate past you but the scrutiny of a live television debate foiled us. Ah well, here’s his replacement.” But letting him run would be worse, as his age-related “glitches of speech and manner, glaring enough already”, are only likely to get worse.
Some 72% of registered voters think he hasn’t the wherewithal to be president. The Democrat failing to find a replacement for Biden, which should have begun as soon as he was elected, is of a piece with the modern left: whenever it becomes obvious that something must be done, they find a way to avoid doing it.
Where is Donald Trump in the race?
While Biden was struggling to finish his sentences and stay in the race, the Supreme Court dealt a “major blow” to one of the efforts to prosecute Donald Trump for election interference, says Jess Bravin in The Wall Street Journal. The court ruled that former presidents “enjoy sweeping immunity” for official acts while in office.
Lower courts will now have to draw the boundaries between what counts as official and unofficial, but the ruling pushes the trial beyond the November election. It’s been accepted for decades “that a president is immune from civil liability for actions taken in office”, says an editorial in the Financial Times.
But the court has now extended that principle, arguing that an “energetic, independent” executive should not be deterred from taking necessary action by concerns over potential criminal prosecution after leaving office. The court’s ruling shunts responsibility for holding the president to account to the Senate and House of Representatives.
But by prioritising an “energetic” presidency over an accountable one, “the court’s conservative justices have chipped away at a central pillar of the American system”.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.

-
Average UK house price reaches £300,000 for first time, Halifax saysWhile the average house price has topped £300k, regional disparities still remain, Halifax finds.
-
Barings Emerging Europe trust bounces back from Russia woesBarings Emerging Europe trust has added the Middle East and Africa to its mandate, delivering a strong recovery, says Max King
-
How a dovish Federal Reserve could affect youTrump’s pick for the US Federal Reserve is not so much of a yes-man as his rival, but interest rates will still come down quickly, says Cris Sholto Heaton
-
New Federal Reserve chair Kevin Warsh has his work cut outOpinion Kevin Warsh must make it clear that he, not Trump, is in charge at the Fed. If he doesn't, the US dollar and Treasury bills sell-off will start all over again
-
How Canada's Mark Carney is taking on Donald TrumpCanada has been in Donald Trump’s crosshairs ever since he took power and, under PM Mark Carney, is seeking strategies to cope and thrive. How’s he doing?
-
Rachel Reeves is rediscovering the Laffer curveOpinion If you keep raising taxes, at some point, you start to bring in less revenue. Rachel Reeves has shown the way, says Matthew Lynn
-
The enshittification of the internet and what it means for usWhy do transformative digital technologies start out as useful tools but then gradually get worse and worse? There is a reason for it – but is there a way out?
-
What turns a stock market crash into a financial crisis?Opinion Professor Linda Yueh's popular book on major stock market crashes misses key lessons, says Max King
-
ISA reforms will destroy the last relic of the Thatcher eraOpinion With the ISA under attack, the Labour government has now started to destroy the last relic of the Thatcher era, returning the economy to the dysfunctional 1970s
-
Why does Trump want Greenland?The US wants to annex Greenland as it increasingly sees the world in terms of 19th-century Great Power politics and wants to secure crucial national interests