What Jay Powell's Jackson Hole message means for markets
Jay Powell delivered a hawkish speech on inflation at last week's Jackson Hole meeting. Alex Rankine explains what his speech means for markets.

“Gone are the days [when] we could rely on a Powell-backed equity rally,” says Ipek Ozkardeskaya of Swissquote Bank. Stockmarkets are used to central bankers offering them goodies when the economy weakens, but last week US Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell instead threatened to remove the punchbowl. He made clear that “inflation must come down even if it means pain for households and businesses”.
The annual “central bankers’ conclave” in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, sees the world’s most powerful monetary policymakers gather to share “the latest reading from their models, crystal balls or chicken intestines”, says Irwin Stelzer in The Sunday Times. In 2021 Powell declared at the meeting that high inflation “was likely to prove temporary”. What a difference a year makes. With US inflation at 8.5%, he will now do battle with the inflationary tiger. Markets tumbled after Powell’s speech, with the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite falling 3.4% and 3.9%.
Japan’s Nikkei slipped by 2.7%. US interest rates are currently between 2.25% and 2.5%. Markets now expect the Fed to raise rates to “3.8% by February 2023, up from expectations of 3.3%” at the beginning of August, says the Financial Times. Powell and other senior global central bankers pushed back strongly against market bets that they will start cutting rates next year, says Bloomberg. Instead, they “expect to raise rates and hold them at elevated levels” until inflation is back under control.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Learning from history
Powell was also at pains to dash hopes that July’s softer inflation figures would herald a Fed pivot, says Ian Shepherdson of Pantheon Macroeconomics. “A single month’s improvement falls far short of what [we] need to see before we are confident that inflation is moving down,” he said. Powell noted that “the historical record cautions strongly against prematurely loosening policy”. Powell is referring to the 1970s, say Thomas Sargent and William Silber in The Wall Street Journal. When inflation spiked to 11% in 1974 thenchair Arthur Burns reacted by hiking rates to more than 12%.
That move temporarily brought inflation under control, but the resulting recession and unemployment then prompted Burns to ease too quickly. He cut short-term rates in half, causing a second price spike that eventually saw inflation peak at 14.6% in 1980. The Fed remained on the back foot in the fight against the “great inflation” until the early 1980s.
Powell will be keen not to repeat that experience, says Russ Mould of AJ Bell. Low unemployment and few “signs of distress in the wider US economy and financial system” from hikes so far will probably embolden the Fed to “keep monetary policy tighter for longer than financial markets currently expect”.
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Alex is an investment writer who has been contributing to MoneyWeek since 2015. He has been the magazine’s markets editor since 2019.
Alex has a passion for demystifying the often arcane world of finance for a general readership. While financial media tends to focus compulsively on the latest trend, the best opportunities can lie forgotten elsewhere.
He is especially interested in European equities – where his fluent French helps him to cover the continent’s largest bourse – and emerging markets, where his experience living in Beijing, and conversational Chinese, prove useful.
Hailing from Leeds, he studied Philosophy, Politics and Economics at the University of Oxford. He also holds a Master of Public Health from the University of Manchester.
-
Are venture-capital trusts worth investing in?
Venture-capital trusts are a tax-efficient way to invest in early-stage companies. But are they worth the risk?
-
'It’s time to close the British steel industry'
Opinion The price tag on British steel is just too high. It's time for Labour to make a grown-up decision and close down the industry, says Matthew Lynn
-
Last orders: can UK pubs be saved?
Pubs in Britain are closing at the rate of one a day, continuing and accelerating a long-term downward trend. Why? And can anything be done to save them?
-
David Ellison: America's new media mogul
David Ellison is building a mighty new force in old and new media. Critics worry that he will prove to be a Trumpian patsy. Is that fair?
-
How Next defied the odds and positioned itself as a British high-street staple
Next rose from a near-death experience and now thrives as a high-street staple. What's driving its success – and should you invest in the retailer?
-
Why investors should avoid market monomania
Opinion Today’s overwhelming focus on US markets leaves investors guessing about opportunities and risks elsewhere
-
Can Rachel Reeves save the City?
Opinion Chancellor Rachel Reeves is mulling a tax cut, which would be welcome – but it’s nowhere near enough, says Matthew Lynn
-
Global investors have overlooked the top innovators in emerging markets
Opinion Carlos Hardenberg, portfolio manager, Mobius Investment Trust, highlights three emerging market stocks where he’d put his money