Investors beware: inflation will return
Central bankers have unleashed unprecedented monetary stimulus in response to the Covid-19 pandemic. For the moment inflation is quiescent. But that won't last.
Central bankers are behaving like “an ostrich putting its head in the sand”, says Charles Goodhart on voxeu.org. The guardians of the world’s currencies have unleashed unprecedented monetary stimulus in response to the pandemic. The US Federal Reserve’s balance sheet has soared by about $3trn since March to over $7trn, more than one-third of US GDP. It could be close to $10trn by year’s end. At £700bn, the Bank of England’s balance sheet is worth roughly one-quarter of Britain’s national income. History shows that “the correlation between monetary growth and inflation” is “as long as your arm”. Yet markets and many economists are strikingly blasé about the risks.
CPI could spike…
For the moment inflation is quiescent. The annual pace of UK consumer price inflation (CPI) in May was just 0.5%, the lowest rate in four years. Month-on-month readings of core US inflation have fallen for three months running. And markets expect the pattern to continue, says James Mackintosh in The Wall Street Journal. US bond prices currently imply that inflation will be below 1% over the next five years.
The argument runs that tumbling oil prices and mass unemployment make deflation the greater immediate danger, says Karen Ward in the Financial Times. Analysts fear that the developed world could follow Japan into stagnation. But energy markets will not remain oversupplied forever and consumer spending – artificially constrained by lockdowns – could “roar back” when restrictions are lifted. That demand surge will run into constrained supply as global supply chains struggle to ramp back up, resulting in higher prices. Within a year we will see that inflation is “very much alive and kicking”.
…or rise gradually
The extreme political, health and economic events of recent years mean that the future contains an “extraordinarily wide range of possibilities”, from a deflationary spiral to a return to 1970s stagflation, reckons Neil Irwin in The New York Times. In the short-term inflation could be subject to a “yo-yo effect”: just look at how oil prices have alternately crashed and then staged a 100% rally in a matter of months. If inflation makes a comeback it may come not as a sudden spike, but as a gradual trend.
Sceptics say that this view has been proved wrong before. The global surge in quantitative easing after the financial crisis did not trigger a sustained rise in inflation. Yet as MoneyWeek pointed out recently, in 2020 two things are different. Firstly, the banks are in much better shape than they were in 2008, so extra cash seems more likely to be redirected into the real economy via loans rather than being used to plug massive holes in balance sheets.
Secondly, consumers’ debt is lower – indeed households have been paying down credit-card debt during the lockdown. That increases the chance of a spending surge once all of that pent-up demand can be released by economic re-opening.
Other trends also point towards a more inflationary 2020s. As Kenneth Rogoff says on Project Syndicate, globalisation has depressed the prices of many goods over recent decades, but the “post-pandemic world” is likely to be one where politicians and voters reject trade openness in favour of simpler and more local supply chains. That may bring more secure control over resources such as masks and medical equipment, but consumers will have to pay a premium for it.
Politicians learn to love rising prices
Politics is at the heart of the inflationary outlook, says Goodhart. Economists assure us that they “know how to deal” with inflation, but they forget that efforts to curb the price rises of the 1970s demanded painful interest rate rises. UK interest rates hit 17% in 1979. That triggered sharp recessions and mass unemployment.
There would be little political appetite for a repeat today. Populists of left and right are “not going to tolerate” spending cuts or interest rate hikes, says Eoin Treacy of Fuller Treacy Money. It is also far easier for left-wing radicals to argue for MMT (“modern monetary theory”, sometimes derisively dubbed the “magic money tree”) when central banks appear to be running a version of it already by “actively supplying governments with as much money as they require”.
After “hosing down the economy with cash” for the pandemic, policymakers will struggle to tell voters that they don’t have any money to spend, Albert Edwards of Société Générale tells Mackintosh. The shift towards more government spending is not confined to the political fringes either, adds Larry Elliott in The Guardian. UK government borrowing this year is heading towards a peacetime record, but “there is no appetite in the Conservative party for a repeat of Osborne’s austerity regime”.
Another reason the path of least political resistance implies higher spending, borrowing and inflation is that the easiest way to get rid of huge debts is through a rise in the general level of prices. If public borrowing is to soar then an inflationary spike – which erodes the real value of debt – will suit the world’s finance ministers just fine over the coming decades.
Gold set for hot summer
Not all markets are so complacent about the inflationary threat. The price of gold hit $1,760/oz this week, the highest level since October 2012. In UK sterling terms the yellow metal has already hit new record peaks. In a time of soaring government spending and an expanding money supply gold looks like an attractive store of value, Dominic O’Kane of JPMorgan tells Connor Smith on Barron’s.
Investors need a hedge against currency debasement and gold fits the bill, agrees John Authers on Bloomberg. It pays no interest, but in an era of negative government bond yields not many other “safe” assets do either. The gold market may be set for a “summer heatwave”.