“The world’s central bankers… are starting to see sense,” says Hamish McRae in The Mail on Sunday.
Minutes from the March meeting of America’s Federal Reserve show that policymakers plan to shrink the Fed’s $9trn balance sheet faster than anticipated in response to soaring inflation. The balance sheet is made up of assets, principally US government bonds and mortgage-backed securities, which the Fed has bought during multiple rounds of quantitative easing (QE).
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
The Fed can reduce its bond holdings by not reinvesting the proceeds of bonds as they mature, or by selling some of them outright. There may be unexpected accidents. In 2019, the last time the Fed was trimming its balance sheet, short-term funding markets briefly seized up after the flood of bonds unleashed on markets caused a cash shortage.
Unclear consequences
Ultra-loose monetary policy has underpinned record US stock returns. Now the rush to tighten policy is casting a cloud over equities. America’s S&P 500 index is down 2.5% since the start of April, with the Nasdaq Composite falling more than 5%. The Fed waited the best part of a decade to begin reversing its financial crisis-era QE. This time it plans to go much faster. Developed countries’ central banks have bought about $12trn in bonds since the pandemic began, says The Economist.
Reversing trillions of dollars of asset purchases might seem like a powerful way to contain inflation.” Yet the way QE works – and hence the effect of unwinding it – is little understood.
One theory is that central-bank bond buying shrinks the “term premium” on bonds, effectively a way of cutting long-term borrowing costs. But research by Dario Perkins of TS Lombard finds that the term premium does not in fact track the size of central bank balance sheets, suggesting QE may have less impact on bond markets than theorised. Another theory is that by inflating asset prices and pushing investors into riskier securities QE helps loosen financial conditions, says Neil Shearing of Capital Economics.
Alternatively, maybe QE is a way for central banks to signal that they are committed to keeping interest rates low. Ultimately no one is quite sure how it works. “It’s therefore impossible to determine how a given amount of QT will affect financial conditions.”
If QE is less important than widely believed, then QT may likewise prove “to be a damp squib”. The US has only been through QT once before, in 2017-2019, says Justin Lahart in The Wall Street Journal. That went relatively smoothly.
But in 2013 the mere hint that the Fed might begin tapering asset purchases sent US bond yields soaring and caused chaos in emerging markets, an event known as the “taper tantrum”. The Fed’s surprise rush into QT this time feels more like the 2013 episode. Investors may not know what will happen when QT begins, but they do “know that they don’t like it”.
-
Gilt yield surge puts Rachel Reeves under renewed pressureRising gilt yields mean government borrowing costs are reaching precarious levels
-
5 alternatives to Reeves’ inheritance tax raid on rural Britain as families face ‘splitting up or selling’ farmsInheritance tax limits are now so low they attack small working family farms rather than just going after tax loopholes, one Cotswolds farmer has said
-
The financial crisis in UK universities – what can be done?UK universities are running out of cash and have begun to shed staff; bankruptcies look likely. What’s gone wrong, and what should be done about it?
-
'Governments are launching an assault on the independence of central banks'Opinion Say goodbye to the era of central bank orthodoxy and hello to the new era of central bank dependency, says Jeremy McKeown
-
Why investors can no longer trust traditional statistical indicatorsOpinion The statistical indicators and data investors have relied on for decades are no longer fit for purpose. It's time to move on, says Helen Thomas
-
The most likely outcome of the AI boom is a big fallOpinion Like the dotcom boom of the late 1990s, AI is not paying off – despite huge investments being made in the hope of creating AI-based wealth
-
The rise of Robin Zeng: China’s billionaire battery kingRobin Zeng, a pioneer in EV batteries, is vying with Li Ka-shing for the title of Hong Kong’s richest person. He is typical of a new kind of tycoon in China
-
How retail investors can gain exposure to Lloyd’s of LondonIt’s hard for retail investors to get in on the action at Lloyd’s of London. Here are some of the ways to gain exposure
-
The goal of business is not profit, but virtueOpinion Serve your customers well, and the profits will follow, according to a new book. It rarely works the other way around, says Stuart Watkins
-
Earnings estimates are a rigged game – especially in the USThe number of US stocks beating earnings estimates tells us only that guidance has deliberately been set too low
