The world's central banks will follow the Federal Reserve's example
The US Federal Reserve – America's central bank – has said that it would become more tolerant of inflation and hold interest rates down. Others will follow.
The new era of global central banking is well and truly underway, says Howard Davies on Project Syndicate. Last month Jerome Powell, the chair of the US Federal Reserve, announced that the central bank would become more tolerant of inflation passing temporarily above the 2% target. Last week, the Fed held interest rates close to zero and signalled that they will stay there until the end of 2023.
The new dovishness has been prompted by persistently low US inflation, which has undershot the target 63% of the time over the past decade. Where the Fed leads others will follow. The European Central Bank is currently conducting its own policy review. Some are keen for the Bank of England to follow, but matters are more complicated for the UK: thanks to the persistently weak pound, “average inflation has been more or less on target” in recent years.
Heading towards zero
The Bank of England’s monetary policy committee (MPC) held interest rates at 0.1% and continued the current quantitative easing programme at its most recent meeting. Minutes revealed that policymakers were briefed on plans to roll out negative interest rates in the future. Governor Andrew Bailey this week reiterated that the policy is “in the tool bag” but pushed back against suggestions that they will be brought in soon.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
“Reading between the lines” it looks like the BoE will not be operationally ready to roll out negative rates until next spring, and then only if it wishes to do so, says Samuel Tombs of Pantheon Macroeconomics. In the meantime, policymakers will lean on more rounds of quantitative easing, which we expect to come around the new year. In the case of a no-deal Brexit, there will be even more quantitative easing and perhaps an interest rate cut to – “but not below” – zero.
MPC members will be studying the experience elsewhere in Europe, where negative interest rates are credited with arresting a deflationary spiral and boosting bank lending, says Tom Stevenson in The Daily Telegraph. Yet there is “scant evidence” that the policy increases economic activity and the effects on bank profits are dire. Beneath a certain level – known as the “reversal rate” – negative rates actually harm economic activity.
Investors adhere to the maxim that you “don’t fight the Fed”, says Jon Sindreu in The Wall Street Journal. The idea is that easy money means stocks are bound to rise. Yet this year’s tide of easy money has not lifted all boats: tech stocks have soared, but some other sectors have slumped. Perhaps there’s a simpler investment prescription for the new monetary era, David Rosenberg of Rosenberg Research tells Barron’s. The Federal Reserve’s “promise to nail rates to the floor” amounts to a giant “‘buy gold’ advertisement”.
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Alex is an investment writer who has been contributing to MoneyWeek since 2015. He has been the magazine’s markets editor since 2019.
Alex has a passion for demystifying the often arcane world of finance for a general readership. While financial media tends to focus compulsively on the latest trend, the best opportunities can lie forgotten elsewhere.
He is especially interested in European equities – where his fluent French helps him to cover the continent’s largest bourse – and emerging markets, where his experience living in Beijing, and conversational Chinese, prove useful.
Hailing from Leeds, he studied Philosophy, Politics and Economics at the University of Oxford. He also holds a Master of Public Health from the University of Manchester.
-
Reeves urged to axe stamp duty from UK shares held in an ISAChancellor Rachel Reeves is reportedly considering axing stamp duty from UK shares held in stocks and shares ISAs. What could it mean for your portfolio?
-
Family investment companies explained: how the ultra wealthy shield their money from the taxmanWealthy families are increasingly turning to family investment companies to keep more of their money away from HMRC – but what are these arrangements and how do they work?
-
Yoshiaki Murakami: Japan’s original corporate raiderThe originator of Japanese activism, Yoshiaki Murakami, was disgraced by an insider-trading scandal in 2006. Now, he's back, shaking things up
-
Galliford Try has firm foundations for strong growthBuilder Galliford Try has a finger in a wide range of pies, notably important work in the public sector
-
Card Factory is a stand-out small-cap going cheapIn a digital world, we still value the personal touch. That’s good news for Card Factory, whose unique business model is suited to weather all economic storms
-
How much gold does China have – and how to cash inChina's gold reserves are vastly understated, says Dominic Frisby. So hold gold, overbought or not
-
Debasing Wall Street's new debasement trade ideaThe debasement trade is a catchy and plausible idea, but there’s no sign that markets are alarmed, says Cris Sholto Heaton
-
Europe’s new single stock market is no panaceaOpinion It is hard to see how a single European stock exchange will fix anything. Friedrich Merz is trying his hand at a failed strategy, says Matthew Lynn
-
Should UK schools ban smartphones?The effects of smartphones on young minds are disturbing, with calls for politicians to make school smartphone bans mandatory. Is radical action needed?
-
Are venture-capital trusts worth investing in?Venture-capital trusts are a tax-efficient way to invest in early-stage companies. But are they worth the risk?