Five years on: what did Covid cost us?
We’re still counting the costs of the global covid pandemic – and governments’ responses. What did we learn from it?

What’s the Covid pandemic’s legacy?
For around two million people in the UK and an estimated 400 million worldwide, the pandemic’s legacy is serious and, in some cases, involves ongoing debilitating, Covid-related illness – including breathlessness, exhaustion, brain fog and multi-organ damage. For millions more, the legacy is grief and loss: more than 225,000 people died in the UK with Covid listed on their death certificate.
For some children, particularly from less affluent backgrounds, there’s a lasting legacy of damage to education.
For younger adults (but not those aged 45 and over), there’s a significantly higher prevalence of mental ill health.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
And for everyone in the UK, the lasting consequences are a weaker economy, a weaker state and higher taxes.
What are the numbers?
Just in terms of direct costs, the UK government spent just under £400 billion (around £5,000 per person) on its Covid response, which is almost a third of this year’s overall government budget. Much of it was borrowed.
Some £70 billion went on furlough schemes, £6.3 billion on the vaccine taskforce, and £15 billion on frontline personal protective equipment.
The rest was extra spending on support of business, and on the health service and emergency services. In terms of the lasting economic hit, it’s far harder to pin down a figure.
Is the economy smaller now than it would have been without Covid? Probably yes, says Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies. “GDP per capita today is similar to before Covid, which is pretty appalling,” but the causes are complex and intertwined. “How much is Covid to blame, how much Brexit, how much government incompetence? It’s hard to say.”
Why a “weaker state”?
The state got bigger during the pandemic: the civil service grew by 51,820 (12%) over two years, reaching 478,310 by March 2022. But it became less productive and delivered poorer services.
There were some good developments, says the Institute for Government. Cross-departmental digital collaboration, for example, has improved. And some Covid projects, such as the furlough scheme and vaccine taskforce, provided lessons for new types of service-delivery models.
Overall, though, the British state is suffering from its own case of “long Covid”.
What exactly is ailing?
Pick a chart of public-service performance – from the justice system to education, to health – and it’s likely that March 2020 will stand out as the point where “middling turns dire”, says The Economist.
Overall, public-sector productivity last year was only nine-tenths of where it stood in 2019. In the NHS staff numbers were up by 19%, but patient numbers by only 14%.
Since 2020, the number of people on waiting lists for consultant-led treatment has almost doubled to 7.5 million.
In 2024, a record 1.8 million waited more than 12 hours in A&E – up from 477,000 in 2019.
What about education?
Schools closed (except for children of key workers) in March 2020 and didn’t fully re-open for a year. Some of the lasting impact is clear.
Attendance rates have fallen: in 2023-2024, pupils at state-funded schools missed an average of 7.1% of sessions, compared with 4.7% in 2018-2019.
Attainment levels in primary schools have fallen, most especially among more deprived groups, and an analysis by the Association for School and College Leaders (ASCL) found an “increase in reading difficulties among year seven pupils” and “very serious problems of arrested language development”.
Staff in primary schools, where “lockdown babies” have now started full-time education, report issues including “lack of toilet training, anxiety in being in social spaces, and depressed executive function”.
Recovery “will be a long slog, not a walk in the park”, says lead author Tim Oates.
The biggest lesson of the pandemic, says Matthew Syed in The Times, is how we failed our children – especially when it came to lockdown.
Did the Covid lockdowns work?
“Non-pharmaceutical interventions” – stay-at-home orders, “social distancing”, mask wearing, and regular testing – definitely helped mitigate the spread of the virus, says Paul Hunter, a professor of medicine at the University of East Anglia who was sceptical about the UK’s later lockdowns. “But whether the benefits outweigh the harms is still far from clear” – and that lack of scientific consensus is regrettable.
Much of the detail of what we witnessed seems ludicrous in retrospect, says Ryan Bourne in The Times. (And indeed to at least a few people at the time.) A key lesson of Covid is that individuals can broadly be trusted to act in their own interests. In devising their measures, policymakers distrusted the public’s nous in handling risk and so “imposed rigid, one-size-fits-all rules” and stoked unnecessary panic. In reality, the public was often ahead of government in taking sensible precautions.
How so?
A key driver of the initial March 2020 lockdown was the famous Imperial College modelling that predicted a “reasonably worst-case” scenario of 510,000 UK deaths in a single, unchecked Covid wave if we did nothing. But this scenario didn’t merely assume no government action: “It assumed everyone would carry on blithely living as normal, as if the virus didn’t exist”.
Thus, it was already out of date when it spooked the government in mid-March. Offices were already shifting to remote work, public transport usage had dropped, and pubs were emptying.
“Sweden’s pandemic experience confirmed this: even without government lockdowns, people distanced as infections surged, creating waves of contagion.” In short, Covid needed a more “human approach”: when the government decides the people “can’t make reasoned decisions, it creates a populace that seeks out detailed orders” indefinitely.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
Sign up for MoneyWeek's newsletters
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Simon Wilson’s first career was in book publishing, as an economics editor at Routledge, and as a publisher of non-fiction at Random House, specialising in popular business and management books. While there, he published Customers.com, a bestselling classic of the early days of e-commerce, and The Money or Your Life: Reuniting Work and Joy, an inspirational book that helped inspire its publisher towards a post-corporate, portfolio life.
Since 2001, he has been a writer for MoneyWeek, a financial copywriter, and a long-time contributing editor at The Week. Simon also works as an actor and corporate trainer; current and past clients include investment banks, the Bank of England, the UK government, several Magic Circle law firms and all of the Big Four accountancy firms. He has a degree in languages (German and Spanish) and social and political sciences from the University of Cambridge.
-
Is investing in AIM still worth it after IHT clampdown?
HMRC expects to rake in £110 million a year from upcoming inheritance tax changes on AIM shares. The tax relief will be cut from April 2026, meaning you could find yourself paying 20% in inheritance tax.
By Katie Williams
-
AI in finance: how is technology changing financial advice?
There are huge opportunities for AI to improve and democratise financial services, particularly financial advice. But is the regulatory environment ready for AI to become mainstream in finance?
By Dan McEvoy
-
Out of America's shadow: Why Trump's tariff chaos may be good for non-US stocks
Opinion Upending global investment and trade could benefit other countries at the expense of the US market, says Cris Sholto Heaton
By Cris Sholto Heaton
-
What caused the Birmingham bin strike – and what does it mean for British businesses?
The Birmingham bin strike is the fallout from an equal-pay claim brought by female cleaners. That bodes ill for the rest of British business
By Simon Wilson
-
Supersonic travel: How China could 'leapfrog' US and Europe's commercial aviation industry
Opinion Innovation in commercial aviation has been stuck for 60 years. A commercial supersonic jet might be back on the market soon, but will China get there first?
By Matthew Lynn
-
How British businesses can tackle Trump's tariffs
The majority of British businesses are likely to take a hit from the chaos caused by Trump’s tariffs to reorder global trade. Companies in the firing line face some difficult decisions, says David Prosser
By David Prosser
-
Trump wants to colonise Mars – will it happen?
Donald Trump wants to plant the US flag on Mars. Could humans really live there?
By Simon Wilson
-
A new wealth tax is a terrible idea. The rich are already being hit by sneaky taxes – Merryn Somerset Webb
Opinion Ideologues want to squeeze more tax out of the rich with a wealth tax. They’re already wrung dry, says Merryn Somerset Webb
By Merryn Somerset Webb
-
Why are energy bills so expensive in the UK?
Electricity bills in the UK are higher than in any comparable rich country. Some blame the net-zero zealotry of the government for that. What is really to blame for high energy bills?
By Simon Wilson
-
Will Putin invade Europe? Why investors know Russia is a paper tiger
Opinion Markets are right to ignore talk of Putin invading Europe, says Max King.
By Max King