Are equities cheap? If you believe in the 'yield gap', the answer is yes. The theory around this holds that, in a normal situation, equities should yield less than bonds and when this situation either reverses or comes close to doing so, it represents a massive opportunity (for those with the guts to take it) to buy into the equity market.
Why? Because the amount paid out on bonds the 'coupon' doesn't rise over the term of the bond. That means that it doesn't compensate for inflation and that investors need a high yield to do the job instead. Equities are better at compensating for inflation dividends should rise as prices rise and the real assets represented by many equities at least hold their value when prices let rip.
I know this sounds rather dull, but the yield gap (the difference between the yields on bonds and equities) is nonetheless causing great excitement in the financial services world this month because it is closing.
Try 6 free issues of MoneyWeek today
Get unparalleled financial insight, analysis and expert opinion you can profit from.
Start your trial
Sign up for MoneyWeek’s free twice-daily newsletter.
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
So much so, that in the UK, Germany and Japan, you now get a better yield on shares than you do on bonds. The same is close to being true in the US.
Latest Videos FromMoneyWeek
According to the bulls, that makes it time to buy, buy, buy. For the gap to return to 'normal' levels, it will take a huge and dramatic rise in the value of the stock market.
However, while this all sounds very attractive, there are problems.
First, whether this makes any sense at all depends on what kind of 'normal' we are living in. Inflation wasn't something people consistently expected until relatively recently. Pre-war, we lived in an era of much more stable prices. Back then, equities always yielded more than bonds. Without inflation to worry about, investors were prepared to take a lower yield from bonds because buying them involved less risk than buying equities. So, if we are now moving to a new kind of normal, one in which deflation is more of a risk than inflation, we should actually be expecting equities to yield much more than bonds.
Look at it like that, and there should be not a dramatic rise but a dramatic fall in the stock market. That wouldn't be so good.
Second, there is an even simpler problem with the yield gap: as an indicator, it doesn't appear to work very well, anyway. A note out this week from Lombard Odier points out that there is in fact "no correlation between the dividend yield gap and forward real equity returns".
So "buying equities when the dividend yield gap is positive (i.e. equities yield more than bonds) is not a systematically more profitable strategy" than doing the opposite. So much for that.
Special FREE report from MoneyWeek magazine: Don't be fooled - house prices will fall again!
- Why UK property prices are set to collapse by 30%
- When it will be time to get back in and buy up dirt cheap property
Still, the yield gap isn't the only thing telling the bulls that equities are cheap. Analysts are now also claiming that forward price/earnings (p/e) ratios are telling us the same. The S&P 500 index is currently on a forward p/e of 12.6 times when its postwar average is just over 13 times.
But there are problems with this, too.
First, the fact that the ratio is a tad below its average hardly tells us it is particularly cheap.
Second, the fact that the ratio being used here is a 'forward' ratio makes the comparison silly. As Lombard Odier point out, times are tricky and no one has any idea what corporate earnings will come in at next year and therefore no idea what p/e ratios will be.
Mostly, when analysts say "forward", what they mean is "made up by extrapolating last year's numbers out a bit". That is particularly dangerous at the moment given that we are on the edge of a dangerous double dip and that, thanks to the cost- cutting forced by recession, profits are currently abnormally high.
All this should make us nervous as should the fact that the only reliable indicator of market performance, the cyclically adjusted p/e ratio (CAPE), is telling us the market is not remotely cheap. According to Lombard Odier (which is clearly staffed by very bearish people), it is currently knocking around 23 times, which is significantly above its long-term average.
So there we have it: on the measures that work, equities aren't very cheap at all. That doesn't mean you should be completely out of the market. Everyone might now think we are entering a deflationary phase, but the risks that we'll get fast inflation instead remain very high indeed. If that happens, the question of whether equities are cheap will be by the by. Everyone will just pile in for the sake of the protection.
With that in mind, I'd still be hanging on to the high-yielding dividend-growing stocks I mentioned last week, and I might also be looking at the City of London Investment Trust (LSE: CTY). It has a 44-year record of producing a rising dividend and a current yield of 4.7% both of which make it just the thing for those who are after inflation protection.
This article was first published in the Financial Times.
