You might not have found this month particularly interesting so far(unless you have more of a grasp of the details of the customs union than most people). But one way or another, April has come with a good few watershed moments.
The first came from the bond market: this week the US ten-year Treasury yield hit 3% for the first time since 2014. That's partly about the reversal of quantitative easing (QE). The Federal Reserve, now headed by Jerome Powell, is now selling bonds into the market, the immediate effect of which is to push down prices and raise yields. But it is also about inflation the oil price has risen sharply in the past couple of weeks, and in the US, inflation expectations are at a four-year high.
This raises all sorts of interesting questions. First, what effect will fast-rising yields have on the stockmarket and the real economy? I've written about this before, but it is hard to see how the overall effect can't be negative.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
The second question, then, is what happens if it is very negative. For the past 20-odd years we have all come to rely on the Federal Reserve stepping in to help whenever markets start to fall (the Greenspan put, then the Bernanke put). But when inflation appeared to be vanquished, slashing rates at the drop of a hat was an easy call. Now inflation is a real risk again (note that commodity prices are at multi-year lows relative to equities), it won't be so easy.
The other watershed moment of the month has to be the resignation of WPP chief executive Martin Sorrell. Shareholders have still not be been told the exact nature of the "impropriety" that prompted his departure. But I think we can be safe in thinking that in some way or another it is connected to the word commentators always use when describing his relationship with WPP: "proprietorial". Sorrell owns around 2% of WPP, but like many heads of listed firms he has long behaved as though that number was closer to 100%. This is a consequence of the fact that big institutional investors have long failed to step up to the governance plate on behalf of all of us. It is time they did. Sorrell has been a huge figure in our corporate world for decades. But his departure should remind fund managers that shareholder democracy only works when shareholders (or their representatives) act as owners. If they did so more often we might see fewer pay scandals, fewer pointless M&As, less short termism possibly even fewer non-disclosable improprieties.
Finally, Bill Bonner still thinks gold is as good as it gets as an insurance against pretty much everything. But he is also getting just a little bit excited about bitcoin, albeit in his usual downbeat style. "There is something going on," he says, "something more than zero."
-
The industry at the heart of global technologyThe semiconductor industry powers key trends such as artificial intelligence, says Rupert Hargreaves
-
What are shareholder voting rights and why do they matter?If you hold shares in a company, the chances are they’ll come with voting rights. But how do you exercise your right to vote? And is your fund manager taking it seriously?
-
Beat the cost of living crisis – go on holidayEditor's letter As inflation rages, energy bills soar and the pound tanks, what’s a good way to save money this winter? Go on holiday, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
How capitalism has been undermined by poor governanceEditor's letter Capitalism’s “ruthless efficiency” has been undermined by poor governance, a lack of competition and central banks’ over-enthusiastic money printing, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
Don't be scared by economic forecastingEditor's letter The Bank of England warned last week the UK will tip into recession this year. But predictions about stockmarkets, earnings or macroeconomic trends can be safely ignored, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
The biggest change in the last 17 years – the death of the “Greenspan put”Editor's letter Since I joined MoneyWeek 17 years ago, says John Stepek, we’ve seen a global financial crisis, a eurozone sovereign debt crisis , several Chinese growth scares, a global pandemic, and a land war in Europe. But the biggest change is the death of the “Greenspan put”.
-
The wolf returns to the eurozone’s doorEditor's letter The eurozone’s intrinsic flaws have been exposed again as investors’ fears about Italy’s ability to pay its debt sends bond yields soaring.
-
Things won't just return to normal – that's not how inflation worksEditor's letter You might think that, if inflation is indeed “transitory”, we just need to wait and everything will return to “normal”. But this is a grave misunderstanding of how inflation works, says John Stepek.
-
Car hire and the strangeness of the post-pandemic economyEditor's letter A global shortage of hire cars and unusually high hotel occupancy rates sum up the post-pandemic global economy in a nutshell, says Merryn Somerset Webb, with enhanced demand meeting restricted supply.
-
Why we need to get a grip on our governmentEditor's letter Our government is trying to do too much, enacting policies that are destructive to the private sector. It needs to drop the the feel-good nonsense and create policies that lead to long-term wealth, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
