Where to shelter from a trade war

If we end up in a full-blown trade war, investors should head for ‘closed’, or self-sufficient, economies.

889_MW_P06_markets_bottom

Tariffs will put Taiwan on the skids

For all the talk of a trade war, it's hardly a done deal just yet, notes Capital Economics. The economic impact of the 25% tariff on $50bn of Chinese imports Trump announced last week is small: they cover 3% of US imports, a similar proportion as the steel and aluminium levies promised a fortnight ago.

The tariffs would also affect just 10% of China's exports, worth 0.25% of Chinese GDP. They may be watered down, as the levies on steel have been. Economies that account for 70% of US steel imports, including the EU, South Korea and Mexico, have got at least temporary exemptions. And China's retaliatory tariffs on US goods worth just $3bn "suggests that its priority is to avoid exacerbating the conflict". Still, assuming we end up in a full-blown trade war, what are investors to do? "The more closed', or self-sufficient the economy, the better," says John Authers in the Financial Times. Those least reliant on trade are the US, Brazil, Japan and China, in that order. The countries that could start a trade war "have the least to lose economically".

Still, economic exposure is not the same as stockmarket exposure; major indices tend to be more international. Half the S&P 500's sales are made outside America, for instance, yet exports comprise just 12% of US GDP. Japan's equity market is full of big exporters.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

Keeping both economic and market vulnerability in mind, the most exposed emerging markets (which are generally more trade-dependent than industrialised ones in any case) are Taiwan and Korea, while the eurozone, notably Germany, looks the most vulnerable developed market. Europe's markets and economies are both highly geared to global trade. At the company level, "smaller seems smarter", says Rana Foroohar on FT.com. Localised players are far less likely to become targets of protectionism than sprawling banks or tech companies.

Andrew Van Sickle

Andrew is the editor of MoneyWeek magazine. He grew up in Vienna and studied at the University of St Andrews, where he gained a first-class MA in geography & international relations.

After graduating he began to contribute to the foreign page of The Week and soon afterwards joined MoneyWeek at its inception in October 2000. He helped Merryn Somerset Webb establish it as Britain’s best-selling financial magazine, contributing to every section of the publication and specialising in macroeconomics and stockmarkets, before going part-time.

His freelance projects have included a 2009 relaunch of The Pharma Letter, where he covered corporate news and political developments in the German pharmaceuticals market for two years, and a multiyear stint as deputy editor of the Barclays account at Redwood, a marketing agency.

Andrew has been editing MoneyWeek since 2018, and continues to specialise in investment and news in German-speaking countries owing to his fluent command of the language.