Over the last few years, you will have heard a lot about how the strength of the "network effect" means that Facebook can't fail. So many people use it to socialise, to organise events, to make work contacts and to get their news that its long-term dominance of all of our social and a large part of our working lives simply isn't in doubt. We haven't been 100% convinced by this (see endless editor's letters past) and this week we are less convinced than ever. Why? Because the value of the networking effect depends on a critical mass of people staying with the platform in question andthat depends on them continuing to trust theplatform.
This week, they don't trust the platform.Thanks to new data abuse revelations, the fourth top trending topic on Twitter on Tuesday was #deletefacebook. The share price is down 7%. Mark Zuckerberg is several billion dollars poorer and anyone who was fool enough to still think that the big tech companies are an unstoppable force (for good or bad) has had a bit of a shock.
If this were the first reputational issue to hit the firm, it might be easier for enthusiastic shareholders to wish away. It isn't. Facebook has long seemed blas about its users' privacy, very blas about how it curates and censors the information on its platform and very much too blas about how much tax it pays in the countries in which it operates (it has only itself to blame for UK and EU determination to introduce some kind of revenue-based taxation).
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Mark Zuckerberg is right to be pleased with how he has proved the doubters wrong as he has built a $500bn company over the last decade. But if he goes on like this, he might soon find himself proving them right.
The good news for Zuckerberg is that this isn't just about him being in a little over his head. The misuse of data at Facebook has reminded everyone of the wider risks to socially cavalier companies priced for eternal growth: all the big tech stocks have seen their share prices nastily hit. But my guess is that it is also going to turn into a nasty reality check for the many start-ups set up for the sole purpose of harvesting and flogging data.
Once we start to think about how our data is collected and sold it won't just be what we "like" and don't "like" that we want to keep private. Will we hand over our email addresses anywhere, any time for a little free Wi-Fi (hence giving away our travel patterns for free)? Will we keep using apps that are designed to harvest our bank accounts for the details of what we buy and when, aggregate them and sell them on (the spending data from 200,000 people is a much better and faster real-time economic indicator than almost anything else!)?
I can't see it. All this has been little discussed until now. But this latest Facebook saga may come to be seen as the day the real national conversation about platforms, data and us really began. Good.
-
Beat the cost of living crisis – go on holidayEditor's letter As inflation rages, energy bills soar and the pound tanks, what’s a good way to save money this winter? Go on holiday, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
How capitalism has been undermined by poor governanceEditor's letter Capitalism’s “ruthless efficiency” has been undermined by poor governance, a lack of competition and central banks’ over-enthusiastic money printing, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
Don't be scared by economic forecastingEditor's letter The Bank of England warned last week the UK will tip into recession this year. But predictions about stockmarkets, earnings or macroeconomic trends can be safely ignored, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
The biggest change in the last 17 years – the death of the “Greenspan put”Editor's letter Since I joined MoneyWeek 17 years ago, says John Stepek, we’ve seen a global financial crisis, a eurozone sovereign debt crisis , several Chinese growth scares, a global pandemic, and a land war in Europe. But the biggest change is the death of the “Greenspan put”.
-
The wolf returns to the eurozone’s doorEditor's letter The eurozone’s intrinsic flaws have been exposed again as investors’ fears about Italy’s ability to pay its debt sends bond yields soaring.
-
Things won't just return to normal – that's not how inflation worksEditor's letter You might think that, if inflation is indeed “transitory”, we just need to wait and everything will return to “normal”. But this is a grave misunderstanding of how inflation works, says John Stepek.
-
Car hire and the strangeness of the post-pandemic economyEditor's letter A global shortage of hire cars and unusually high hotel occupancy rates sum up the post-pandemic global economy in a nutshell, says Merryn Somerset Webb, with enhanced demand meeting restricted supply.
-
Why we need to get a grip on our governmentEditor's letter Our government is trying to do too much, enacting policies that are destructive to the private sector. It needs to drop the the feel-good nonsense and create policies that lead to long-term wealth, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
