The UK is to pay a Brexit bill. Lots of people are upset. Extreme leavers reckon we shouldn't have to pay a penny, on the basis that there is no legal reason to do so. Extreme remainers are upset, because as far as they can see, the only tiny upside to Brexit is a small up-front cash saving to serve as a mini-buffer to the financial apocalypse they (still) have no doubt is on the way.
Here at MoneyWeek, we aren't much bothered. Regular readers will know that we worry endlessly about the public finances (for a hint as to why, see James Ferguson's analysis piece). But this Brexit bill doesn't make things much worse. First, if the final bill does turn out to be in the region of €45bn-€55bn (£38bn-£48bn no figure has been confirmed), this really isn't much in the great scheme of the UK's public finances. It's significantly less than the (far too much) we spend on the interest on our debt every year; it is not much more than a third of what we spend on paying the state pension in the UK every year; and it adds up to around 2.5% of one year of our GDP.
Second, it isn't to be paid as a lump sum (apparently remember this is all pretty vague at the moment), but for the transition period (that's about £9bn a year for two years, if we assume that our annual bill in transition is the same as our annual bill now) and then in dribs and drabs as the bills for things we have agreed to during our membership arrive (all those expensive pensions for example). That makes it rather more palatable than it might have been.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Third, even this sum will shortly leave quite a cash buffer: it adds up to four to five years' worth of our current payments. Since 2000 we have paid the EU more than €100bn more than we have received back. Finally, it comes to about £600 per person or 7% of a bitcoin. We haven't been commenting much on Brexit here for a while. The process involves an overlay of press hysteria and an underlay of steady admin completion which makes most comment pointless and we have also been assuming a fairly straightforward result since the referendum last year.
What's on the cards? A wind-down of our contributions in the region now being suggested (something we think of as being something of a kindness to an EU that really can't cope with a hole in its budget just now). A fairly all-encompassing trade deal, alongside a freedom of movement deal that limits tax credits and welfare to new arrivals (again, see James Ferguson on why this matters). A sensible agreement on Ireland. And in the end, a new relationship with the EU that respects both sovereignty and the economy on both sides. So far so good.
-
Investors are snapping up gilts thanks to tax incentives – but is your money better off elsewhere?UK government bonds, also known as gilts, are proving popular with investors so far this year, thanks to higher interest rates and the attractive tax incentives they offer. Should you invest in them?
-
Rightmove: Asking prices edge closer to record peakAsking prices have been driven up by the top-end of the market, Rightmove has found. But how does the situation look in your area?
-
Beat the cost of living crisis – go on holidayEditor's letter As inflation rages, energy bills soar and the pound tanks, what’s a good way to save money this winter? Go on holiday, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
How capitalism has been undermined by poor governanceEditor's letter Capitalism’s “ruthless efficiency” has been undermined by poor governance, a lack of competition and central banks’ over-enthusiastic money printing, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
Don't be scared by economic forecastingEditor's letter The Bank of England warned last week the UK will tip into recession this year. But predictions about stockmarkets, earnings or macroeconomic trends can be safely ignored, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
The biggest change in the last 17 years – the death of the “Greenspan put”Editor's letter Since I joined MoneyWeek 17 years ago, says John Stepek, we’ve seen a global financial crisis, a eurozone sovereign debt crisis , several Chinese growth scares, a global pandemic, and a land war in Europe. But the biggest change is the death of the “Greenspan put”.
-
The wolf returns to the eurozone’s doorEditor's letter The eurozone’s intrinsic flaws have been exposed again as investors’ fears about Italy’s ability to pay its debt sends bond yields soaring.
-
Things won't just return to normal – that's not how inflation worksEditor's letter You might think that, if inflation is indeed “transitory”, we just need to wait and everything will return to “normal”. But this is a grave misunderstanding of how inflation works, says John Stepek.
-
Car hire and the strangeness of the post-pandemic economyEditor's letter A global shortage of hire cars and unusually high hotel occupancy rates sum up the post-pandemic global economy in a nutshell, says Merryn Somerset Webb, with enhanced demand meeting restricted supply.
-
Why we need to get a grip on our governmentEditor's letter Our government is trying to do too much, enacting policies that are destructive to the private sector. It needs to drop the the feel-good nonsense and create policies that lead to long-term wealth, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
