Do super-low interest rates help the economy or hurt it? Economic models (the ones that central bankers use) tell us they help it. Low rates cut the costs of both servicing existing debt, and taking out new debt. This encourages some to spend, and some to borrow and spend.
The transmission mechanism is easy and obvious. Anyone who can't see how it works or who is calling for rates to rise when the global economy is still so 'abnormal' is therefore an obvious idiot. Or that is how the average economist sees it. We disagree. Why? Because the macro economic models we use today take no account of changing demographics and of behavioural incentives.
Western populations are ageing. Older populations react to low rates in ways that models just don't recognise. Those with final-salary pensions read about the huge pension deficits at their former employers, caused by low interest rates (it's technical, but the lower rates go, the higher deficits go). This doesn't make them want to spend. It makes them worry that they will soon have nothing to spend.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
The same goes for those with defined-contribution pensions: people who know they have to make a pot of cash last for 30 years find the low interest rates and huge market volatility our current monetary arrangements are giving them terrifying. Not comforting at all (I have an upcoming interview with demographic expert Paul Hodges that touches on all this look out for it).
Fans of low rates and QE will say that the low yield is an irrelevance the rise in the value of their assets (loose monetary policy has driven asset prices up) more than compensates. But rational as that might sound to economic model makers, it just isn't how people think. It is hard-wired into the UK financial brain, rightly or wrongly, that capital must not be spent only income can be spent. That's what matters to real people.
But low rates don't just have perverse behavioural effects on individuals. They affect firms too. Which CEO will sign off on a huge new investment programme when their pension trustees demand another couple of hundred million after every meeting, or, for that matter, when their industry is already riddled with excess supply? Super-low interest rates mean failing industries and no end of individual firms are effectively being constantly bailed out by the state. All the excess supply of the bubble period is still with us, whether it's useful or not, and it will be until rates eventually rise.
We have an interview with behavioural economist Richard Thaler in next week's issue in which I touch on all this in more detail. But the point is this: low rates may no longer be the solution to our problems, they may be causing our economic and hence political problems. They may be the thing making our environment 'abnormal'. There's more on how this affects politics in John Stepek's cover story. Clue: it's all about Jeremy Corbyn.
-
Beat the cost of living crisis – go on holidayEditor's letter As inflation rages, energy bills soar and the pound tanks, what’s a good way to save money this winter? Go on holiday, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
How capitalism has been undermined by poor governanceEditor's letter Capitalism’s “ruthless efficiency” has been undermined by poor governance, a lack of competition and central banks’ over-enthusiastic money printing, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
Don't be scared by economic forecastingEditor's letter The Bank of England warned last week the UK will tip into recession this year. But predictions about stockmarkets, earnings or macroeconomic trends can be safely ignored, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
The biggest change in the last 17 years – the death of the “Greenspan put”Editor's letter Since I joined MoneyWeek 17 years ago, says John Stepek, we’ve seen a global financial crisis, a eurozone sovereign debt crisis , several Chinese growth scares, a global pandemic, and a land war in Europe. But the biggest change is the death of the “Greenspan put”.
-
The wolf returns to the eurozone’s doorEditor's letter The eurozone’s intrinsic flaws have been exposed again as investors’ fears about Italy’s ability to pay its debt sends bond yields soaring.
-
Things won't just return to normal – that's not how inflation worksEditor's letter You might think that, if inflation is indeed “transitory”, we just need to wait and everything will return to “normal”. But this is a grave misunderstanding of how inflation works, says John Stepek.
-
Car hire and the strangeness of the post-pandemic economyEditor's letter A global shortage of hire cars and unusually high hotel occupancy rates sum up the post-pandemic global economy in a nutshell, says Merryn Somerset Webb, with enhanced demand meeting restricted supply.
-
Why we need to get a grip on our governmentEditor's letter Our government is trying to do too much, enacting policies that are destructive to the private sector. It needs to drop the the feel-good nonsense and create policies that lead to long-term wealth, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
