Until the publication of my article in February this year, "not a single bad word" about the now-defunct Kids Company or its chief executive, Camila Batmanghelidjh, had appeared in the mainstream media for the best part of 20 years, says Miles Goslett in The Spectator.
When I began investigating the charity in 2013, I was struck by the "improbable statistics" quoted in the newspapers about the number of children it helped: a figure of 16,500 in 2010 jumped to 36,000 in 2011, a number "obediently repeated" by every publication thereafter. That the charity was helping a group larger than Newbury's population, in London alone, seemed "incredible".
Yet celebrities and philanthropists "flocked to the cause".
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
The closure is terrible news for those who relied on it. But any group that raises £150m over two decades, much of it from the public purse, and winds up in "such sorry circumstances" deserves to be "scrutinised to the highest degree". The trustees, led by the BBC's Alan Yentob, and Batmanghelidjh, all owe explanations.
Batmanghelidjh's "passionate defence" against the allegations has had "more than an air of the persecuted martyr", says Harriet Sergeant in The Daily Telegraph, with hints of dark secrets about sexual abuse and an "establishment plot".
But along with tales of financial mismanagement, claims of a "culture of fear and favouritism" are emerging.
Yet while the charity was unconventional, revolving around the "lodestar of its eccentric founder", who is "so dyslexic she can't read a text message, let alone a balance sheet", many professionals admired the clinical work therapists did with disturbed children, says Eleanor Mills in The Sunday Times.
What has got lost in "all the hullabaloo" is the reason it existed, which is to "fill the gaps in our creaking care' service". It drew funds because it did good work. Why else would the government have handed it over £30m of taxpayers' money since 2008?
As a rule, charities tend to be more effective than the state at helping vulnerable people, says Philip Collins in The Times. They know the local area and have a set of values that the "remote, bureaucratic state cannot match".
The immediate consequence of Kids Company's demise is that the children will fall back on ill-prepared local authorities without the money, time or expertise to look after them.
But running a charity is hard. They have to deal with clients who are "either chaotic or recalcitrant" and are often reliant on "capricious donors" for funding.
When large sums of public money are available, as they were in this instance, "accountability has to be better". There is no shortage of "idle cash" in Britain and to escape tougher regulation, charities must consolidate, raise more money, and run themselves like businesses. "It would be terrible" if the verdict of this episode was that charities are not fit to provide services.
Every time a relationship works between a child and a company like Kids Company, "society gets a little bigger".
-
UK inflation expected to rise to 2.8% in January’s reportThe rate of UK inflation is expected to rise when January’s figures are published tomorrow, partly driven by a bounce in airfares and the introduction of VAT on private school fees
-
NS&I cuts Premium Bonds prize fund rate in fresh blow for saversNS&I has announced changes to a number of its savings products including Premium Bonds today. We explain what it means for savers.
-
Donald Trump's tariffs spark a global game of thronesWe don’t know what Donald Trump intends or will do next. That is in itself damaging.
-
Heathrow's third runway cleared for take-off – but will it boost growth?Heathrow Airport will finally get its third runway but critics argue a bigger Heathrow isn't the answer to boosting growth.
-
Labour is throttling business - a change of direction is needed, says Matthew LynnOpinion Will the last major global business to leave Britain please turn off the punishingly expensive lights?
-
Has inflation been tamed in the UK?After a surprise drop in inflation, the Bank of England is set for more rate cuts in the year ahead. But investors are cautious about pricing in too many cuts
-
Why is the UK's economic growth falling behind?Poor economic growth and productivity in the UK is due to several factors that are our own fault, says David C. Stevenson
-
What does Rachel Reeves's visit to China mean for the UK?The Chancellor faced severe criticism for her China visit amid financial market turmoil. But how important is reviving economic ties with China for Britain?
-
Is the Office for National Statistics fit for purpose?Britain’s statistics authority, the Office for National Statistics, is increasingly unfit for purpose. Why, and what can be done?
-
Is there hope for the UK economy in 2025?Analysis The UK economy's upswing we enjoyed in the first half of 2024 has petered out thanks to a darkening global backdrop and concern over burdens imposed by Labour, says Julian Jessop
