Until the publication of my article in February this year, "not a single bad word" about the now-defunct Kids Company or its chief executive, Camila Batmanghelidjh, had appeared in the mainstream media for the best part of 20 years, says Miles Goslett in The Spectator.
When I began investigating the charity in 2013, I was struck by the "improbable statistics" quoted in the newspapers about the number of children it helped: a figure of 16,500 in 2010 jumped to 36,000 in 2011, a number "obediently repeated" by every publication thereafter. That the charity was helping a group larger than Newbury's population, in London alone, seemed "incredible".
Yet celebrities and philanthropists "flocked to the cause".
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
The closure is terrible news for those who relied on it. But any group that raises £150m over two decades, much of it from the public purse, and winds up in "such sorry circumstances" deserves to be "scrutinised to the highest degree". The trustees, led by the BBC's Alan Yentob, and Batmanghelidjh, all owe explanations.
Batmanghelidjh's "passionate defence" against the allegations has had "more than an air of the persecuted martyr", says Harriet Sergeant in The Daily Telegraph, with hints of dark secrets about sexual abuse and an "establishment plot".
But along with tales of financial mismanagement, claims of a "culture of fear and favouritism" are emerging.
Yet while the charity was unconventional, revolving around the "lodestar of its eccentric founder", who is "so dyslexic she can't read a text message, let alone a balance sheet", many professionals admired the clinical work therapists did with disturbed children, says Eleanor Mills in The Sunday Times.
What has got lost in "all the hullabaloo" is the reason it existed, which is to "fill the gaps in our creaking care' service". It drew funds because it did good work. Why else would the government have handed it over £30m of taxpayers' money since 2008?
As a rule, charities tend to be more effective than the state at helping vulnerable people, says Philip Collins in The Times. They know the local area and have a set of values that the "remote, bureaucratic state cannot match".
The immediate consequence of Kids Company's demise is that the children will fall back on ill-prepared local authorities without the money, time or expertise to look after them.
But running a charity is hard. They have to deal with clients who are "either chaotic or recalcitrant" and are often reliant on "capricious donors" for funding.
When large sums of public money are available, as they were in this instance, "accountability has to be better". There is no shortage of "idle cash" in Britain and to escape tougher regulation, charities must consolidate, raise more money, and run themselves like businesses. "It would be terrible" if the verdict of this episode was that charities are not fit to provide services.
Every time a relationship works between a child and a company like Kids Company, "society gets a little bigger".
-
Savills: Average house prices to grow by 22% over next five yearsHouse prices in Scotland, Wales and northern England are forecast to experience the biggest uptick
-
How to shield your money as Reeves refuses to rule out income tax hikes and warns of ‘necessary choices’Chancellor Rachel Reeves appeared to lay the groundwork for higher taxes in the Autumn Budget on Tuesday morning and refused to stand by her manifesto pledge not to increase income tax.
-
The Stella Show is still on the road – can Stella Li keep it that way?Stella Li is the globe-trotting ambassador for Chinese electric-car company BYD, which has grown into a world leader. Can she keep the motor running?
-
LVMH is set to prosper as the wealthy start shopping againAfter two years of uncertainty, the outlook for LVMH is starting to improve. Is now a good time to add the luxury-goods purveyor to your portfolio?
-
Japan is still rising to new highs – here's how to investOpinion Political ructions in Japan are no obstacle to gains, and the return of inflation may even benefit stocks, says Max King. What is Japan doing right?
-
Investors need to get ready for an age of uncertainty and upheavalTectonic geopolitical and economic shifts are underway. Investors need to consider a range of tools when positioning portfolios to accommodate these changes
-
Investing in UK universities: how to spin research into profitsUK universities are a vital economic asset, but they are also Britain's 'equivalent of Gulf oil.' There are opportunities here for investors
-
Lessons from Nobel Prize winners in economics on how to nurture a culture of growthThe Nobel Prize in economics went to three thinkers who show us why economies grow and how we can help them do so. Governments would be wise to heed the lessons
-
'It’s time for Rachel Reeves to secure her legacy'Opinion Rachel Reeves has been a dreadful chancellor, and it's hard to see her remaining in office for another whole year. She could at least depart with some dignity
-
Yoshiaki Murakami: Japan’s original corporate raiderThe originator of Japanese activism, Yoshiaki Murakami, was disgraced by an insider-trading scandal in 2006. Now, he's back, shaking things up
