When Chancellor George Osborne stood up to give the last Budget of this government this week, he described a country I really want to live in. One that is working on cutting its risk by bringing the size of the state back to a level that can be financed by its tax take.
One with an economy rebalancing away from financial engineering and towards productive business; away from the south towards the north (apparently a job is being created in the Midlands every ten minutes); and away from humouring the non-productive via the overblown welfare state in favour of rewarding the productive.
And one in which budget gimmicks and giveaways have been dumped in favour of fiscal discipline. The sun is starting to shine on the UK, he said, "and we're fixing the roof". It was a pretty good start.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
But the actual Budget didn't live up to the promise. First, look at how much the UK still overspends. In 2014, central government expenditure per person was around £10,000. But revenues came in at only £9,235 per person. So, even in Osborne's new world of fiscal responsibility, we spend £765 per person more than we get in tax revenues, says the Economic Research Council.
That doesn't include the state's unfunded liabilities, and at some point we have to pay down the actual debt too. Osborne has made a good start, but as several commentators have noted, even as he fixes the roof he needs to remember our foundations are still pretty shaky too.
Having been less than 100% clear on the UK's debt woes, Osborne moved on to the tweaks and gimmicks we hoped we wouldn't see. He cut the pensions lifetime allowance to £1m, introducing yet more complication and guesswork into pension savings.
Then he announced the help-to-buy individual savings account (which tops up the cash of a first-time buyer saving for a deposit on a house with taxpayers' money).
This is a shameless attempt to buy the votes of the young rather than actually help them. The policy not only screams administrative nightmare (what if they change their minds?), but is useless for its stated purpose.
If Osborne really wanted to help first-time buyers, he wouldn't be handing over free money to compensate for rising prices. He'd find a way to cut prices by giving retirees an incentive to downsize, by doing something to bring small housebuilders back into the market, or by getting interest rates up. That would be real help to buy. This is just help to bubble.
Then came a list of mini bribes the flexible Isa, the £1,000 savings income allowance, and the reiteration of the attempt to offer pensions freedom to annuity holders.
The end result? Osborne leaves behind a "longer and more complicated tax system than he inherited", says Gary Richards of Berwin Leighton Paisner. That seems a shame after such a good start.
-
Inflation may be slipping but there is still plenty of misery aheadEditor's letter Inflation may be a little lower than last month as the prices of petrol and diesel fall back, but it remains structural and long-term, says Merryn Somerset Webb. And there are no painless solutions.
-
Beat the cost of living crisis – go on holidayEditor's letter As inflation rages, energy bills soar and the pound tanks, what’s a good way to save money this winter? Go on holiday, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
How capitalism has been undermined by poor governanceEditor's letter Capitalism’s “ruthless efficiency” has been undermined by poor governance, a lack of competition and central banks’ over-enthusiastic money printing, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
Don't be scared by economic forecastingEditor's letter The Bank of England warned last week the UK will tip into recession this year. But predictions about stockmarkets, earnings or macroeconomic trends can be safely ignored, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
The biggest change in the last 17 years – the death of the “Greenspan put”Editor's letter Since I joined MoneyWeek 17 years ago, says John Stepek, we’ve seen a global financial crisis, a eurozone sovereign debt crisis , several Chinese growth scares, a global pandemic, and a land war in Europe. But the biggest change is the death of the “Greenspan put”.
-
The wolf returns to the eurozone’s doorEditor's letter The eurozone’s intrinsic flaws have been exposed again as investors’ fears about Italy’s ability to pay its debt sends bond yields soaring.
-
Things won't just return to normal – that's not how inflation worksEditor's letter You might think that, if inflation is indeed “transitory”, we just need to wait and everything will return to “normal”. But this is a grave misunderstanding of how inflation works, says John Stepek.
-
The public may have reached its limit for tax risesEditor's letter The UK tax burden is now at a 70-year high. And, while there may be some reason to hold off on cuts right now, taxes are too high because the state tries to do too much. Perhaps it should do less, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
