I get asked a lot what would make the public trust the financial industry again. The answer is remarkably simple: all you have to do, I tell the assorted bankers, fund managers and financial advisers who ask, is be trustworthy and be seen to be trustworthy. Bring a little transparency, simplicity and honesty into what you do and all will be well.
I usually say this to enthusiastic nodding all round. But that nodding means nothing. If it did, the front page of the FT wouldn't have carried a story on Wednesday telling us that Rabobank has been fined $1bn for manipulating benchmark interest rates; that Deutsche Bank has put aside €1.2bn to cover various legal penalties; and Lloyds another £750m to cover the compensation it is having to pay out for PPI mis-selling. Its bill so far is £8bn. Real money.
You might say all these sins are in the past. Today's stories are about the reckonings, not the crimes. But that would be to think that all was well today. Not so.
Try 6 free issues of MoneyWeek today
Get unparalleled financial insight, analysis and expert opinion you can profit from.
Start your trial
Sign up for MoneyWeek’s free twice-daily newsletter.
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
On the front pages on the same day were stories about the way in which the "broad system of fund-management charges lacks transparency" and more on how old pension schemes somehow manage to have total expense ratios on their funds of 2.5%-plus. It's hard to make your money work for you when it is so very occupied working for somebody else.
Latest Videos FromMoneyWeek
Then there is the debacle of the Royal Mail privatisation. Most people seem to be over this, but I just can't let it go. One reason we pay our investment bankers so very well is so that they can make the right decisions about things such as the market value of a share in the Royal Mail; it isn't easy to do.
But you might think they should be able to do it within a 10%-15% margin of error. They didn't. They got it wrong by 60%. I could have done that myself as could any of you.
When the history books look back on this, they may also wonder about how this grotesquely undervalued issue was allocated. The asset management businesses of the big banks were bidders for stock. So were the banks' biggest and most profitable trading partners.
I'm £460 richer than I was a few weeks ago. But the largest single investor in the company, a London-based hedge fund with a 5.8% stake, has made a paper gain of tens of millions. Is that really what we wanted?
All these headlines surely make it clear that nothing has really changed in decades. Forty-something readers will remember the Pet Shop Boys track Shopping, released just after a host of underpriced privatisations and before the UK's last big storm in October 1987:
No questions in the House, no give and take There's a Big Bang in the City We're all on the make Our gain is your loss, that's the price you pay I heard it in the House of Commons everything's for sale.
