Thousands of savers who gave up valuable final-salary pension benefits did so after consulting financial advisers who knew they would only get paid if they recommended a pension transfer, new data from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the City regulator, reveals. The figures will increase the pressure on the FCA to explain why it took so long to outlaw a controversial charging model despite warnings it was fuelling the mis-selling of pension transfers.
In October, the FCA announced advisers would no longer be allowed to charge contingent fees when giving advice on transfers. Such fees are only payable if the saver ultimately decides to transfer their pension savings, prompting concerns that many advisers were recommending such transfers simply to get paid – despite a widespread consensus that giving up final-salary occupational pensions scheme benefits, which are guaranteed, does not make sense for the vast majority of people.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Nowhere to turn
Those caught out by the scandal have limited recourse to redress. Reversing the transfer is unlikely to be possible, leaving savers with no alternative but to pursue their advisers for compensation, either directly or through the Financial Ombudsman Service. However, there is some concern about advisers who have since gone out of business, especially since the regulator’s data shows some were not properly insured. That would leave savers with nowhere to turn.
For its part, the FCA consistently refused to ban contingent fees in 2018 and 2019 because it said there was insufficient evidence that the practice was leading to poor advice. The regulator has always been concerned that many savers are uncomfortable with the idea of paying for advice upfront, particularly if that advice turns out to be that they are better off doing nothing.
In the end, however, the FCA felt compelled to act against contingent charging, given its prevalence and the large numbers of people giving up final-salary pension benefits despite repeated warnings they were likely to be worse off as a result. The regulator conceded the practice meant advisers had a clear conflict of interest.
-
Lasting power of attorney rejections soar 200% costing families £5 million – how to get it rightReasons for lasting power of attorney applications being rejected include human error but can also be due to the inconsistent views of those reviewing the application.
-
UK inflation live: UK inflation fell to 3.6% in OctoberToday's ONS inflation data release confirms the Bank of England's assumption that inflation would fall after September. More analysis and reaction to follow.
-
Who is Jared Isaacman, SpaceX astronaut and Trump's pick as NASA chief?Jared Isaacman is a close ally of Elon Musk and the first non-professional astronaut to walk in space. Now, he is in charge of NASA
-
'Rachel Reeves’s tax rise will crash the economy'Opinion Rachel Reeves will be the first chancellor since Denis Healey in the 1970s to raise income tax. It will only push Britain into recession, says Matthew Lynn
-
Venture capital trusts that offer growth, income and tax reliefOpinion Alex Davies, founder of high-net-worth investment service Wealth Club, picks three venture capital trusts where he'd put his money
-
'How I brought MoneyWeek to the masses'Launching MoneyWeek gave ordinary investors information – and hence power, says Merryn Somerset Webb
-
'It’s time for Rachel Reeves to secure her legacy'Opinion Rachel Reeves has been a dreadful chancellor, and it's hard to see her remaining in office for another whole year. She could at least depart with some dignity
-
Klarna leads a financial revolution – should investors buy?Klarna has ambitions to rewire the global payments system and has huge growth potential
-
Are venture-capital trusts worth investing in?Venture-capital trusts are a tax-efficient way to invest in early-stage companies. But are they worth the risk?
-
Can Rachel Reeves save the City?Opinion Chancellor Rachel Reeves is mulling a tax cut, which would be welcome – but it’s nowhere near enough, says Matthew Lynn
