William Gibbs McAdoo. My guess is that it isn't a name you know that well. Perhaps you should. According to a book out in 2007 When Washington Shut Down Wall Street by William Silber he was a "financial superhero" who "saved the American economy" back in the early days of WWI.
According to Daniel Gross (who reviewed Silber's book on Slate.com), it was his actions in the chaotic autumn of 1914 that"enabled the US to seize the mantle of economic leadership from London".
How? At the time, the US was a "global debtor nation with an unloved currency that was subject to recurring panics". It had also recently started setting up its own central bank the Federal Reserve (in response to the most recent unpleasant panic of 1907) although not all the details were in place.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
McAdoo was in charge of it. The problem or opportunity began as war broke out in the summer and the Europeans (particularly the British and French) began to liquidate their US assets to finance the fight. The US dollar was backed by gold so they needed to be paid in gold. America did not have enough gold. The result, says a recent note from Chris Andrew and Mustafa Zaidi of Clarmond House, looked predictable.
There would be a currency crisis, a stock market collapse, a run on all the banks and an "all encompassing financial calamity". None of that happened. Instead, McAdoo simply shut down Wall Street.
No one could sell, there was no more capital flight and no more gold was required. Simple. He then provided liquidity to domestic banks to get them through the crisis by flooding them with new currency which he made a big deal of delivering in armoured convoys ("the QE of his day"). This prevented there being any bank runs. And finally he urged congress to set up what became the Bureau of War Risk Insurance which offered government-backed insurance to exporters shipping goods to war-torn Europe.
It was all risky stuff, and McAdoo (who was by then engaged to Woodrow Wilson's daughter) knew that if he didn't have an exit route in place, his actions and in particular the flooding of the country with money would "wreck America". But he did have a plan, say Andrew and Zaidi.
He told the Europeans that he would lift the sales ban on the condition that all parties to the new war allowed the US to sell war materials and commodities to everyone the British, French and Germans. Everyone accepted in the end and (fully insured) US merchandise was soon landing everywhere from Le Havre to Hamburg: the security sales were offset by the exports; America's gold was safe; and the US eventually emerged from the war as a creditor rather than a debtor nation.
The key point here is that the "shock and awe" actions worked because they were emergency actions taken in the very short term with an end in mind. That's not so much the case today.
If you ask now, say Andrew and Zaidi, what the exit plan from the emergency measures the Fed and other central banks started taking four years ago the answer is "ambiguous, imprecise and uncertain". It depends on consumer spending. Or perhaps the stock market. Or maybe house prices. The truth is that there isn't really an exit plan: "emergency measures have become routine".
That's a problem. So much so that it might even mean that today's actions "bring to a finale the US dollar's monetary hegemony that McAdoo's exit plan established".
-
Beating inflation takes more luck than skill – but are we about to get lucky?Opinion The US Federal Reserve managed to beat inflation in the 1980s. But much of that was down to pure luck. Thankfully, says Merryn Somerset Webb, the Bank of England may be about to get lucky.
-
Rishi Sunak can’t fix all our problems – so why try?Opinion Rishi Sunak’s Spring Statement is an attempt to plaster over problems the chancellor can’t fix. So should he even bother trying, asks Merryn Somerset Webb?
-
Young people are becoming a scarce resource – we should value them more highlyOpinion In the last two years adults have been bizarrely unkind to children and young people. That doesn’t bode well for the future, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
Ask for a pay rise – everyone else isOpinion As inflation bites and the labour market remains tight, many of the nation's employees are asking for a pay rise. Merryn Somerset Webb explains why you should do that too.
-
Why central banks should stick to controlling inflationOpinion The world’s central bankers are stepping out of their traditional roles and becoming much more political. That’s a mistake, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
How St Ives became St Tropez as the recovery drives prices sky highOpinion Merryn Somerset Webb finds herself at the epicentre of Britain’s V-shaped recovery as pent-up demand flows straight into Cornwall’s restaurants and beaches.
-
The real problem of Universal Basic Income (UBI)Merryn's Blog April employment numbers showed 75 per cent fewer people in the US returned to employment compared to expectations. Merryn Somerset-Webb explains how excessive government support is causing a shortage of labour.
-
Why an ageing population is not necessarily the disaster many people think it isOpinion We’ve got used to the idea that an ageing population is a bad thing. But that’s not necessarily true, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
