It has always been a mild mystery to me why private schools cling so desperately to their charitable status. It can't save them particularly large amounts of money, particularly given how much they are expected to "give back" in terms of shared facilities and bursaries, and it brings them endlessly political bother, something most of them could happily do without. I suspect that if they could all find easy ways of getting out of the whole charity thing (it isn't easy, given the networks of trusts that finance them) they would.
Still, the efforts of schools to keep their shows on the road and the efforts of campaigners to stop them doing so do sometimes throw up interesting results.
This weeks is the suggestion from the Independent Schools Council that private schools could take in 10,000 children from low-income households every year if the government chucks in £5,500 per head, the cost of educating them in the state system (it is more like £6,100 in Scotland for worse results, but we will leave that hot potato aside for the moment). The schools would then cove the remainder of the cost.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
There will be now be lots of trying class-related arguments over the idea. Does it help the needy or simply skim the good kids out of comps to the further detriment of the dim kids? Is it horribly unfair on parents who can afford private school? They currently subsidise the state education system by paying for it but not using it, and this would mean they would subsidise the system inside the private school they are paying for, too (someone has to cover the additional cost of the "free" kids).
But all that aside, the idea looks interesting to me because it references the possibility of a school voucher system, one in which every parent gets a £5,500 voucher per kid to spend on education as they like at a state school with no top up, or at a private school with top up.
We already do something like this with nursery care and it works pretty well so why not do the same with primary and secondary education? It would, as I wrote here a few years ago, "force rubbish schools across the spectrum to either raise their game or close", something that would push up standards across the country.
There is (as ever) a school of thought that thinks this will be no more than a subsidy for the rich vouchers they can take to existing private schools just get their kids the same education at less cost. But this rather misses the point.
This isn't about class warfare (remember that all the parents with kids at private schools at the moment are saving the state £5,500 odd a year each already) and the thrust of policy shouldn't be to find ways of penalising those who can already afford a good education for their children, but to try and make sure that everyone gets a good education whatever their parents' income level.
If everyone thought that was the case now, the independent sector would barely exist anyway, and polls such as this one wouldn't suggest that going on 100% of people would send their children to private schools if it were "free".
This initiative from the ISC isn't the same as a voucher system, of course (the schools pay the top up, not the parents). But if the government goes for it, it will be an interesting step in the right direction.
If the poor are allowed to transfer their educational cash around schools why should the not so poor (anyone prepared to make their own top ups) not be allowed the same privilege?
-
Beating inflation takes more luck than skill – but are we about to get lucky?Opinion The US Federal Reserve managed to beat inflation in the 1980s. But much of that was down to pure luck. Thankfully, says Merryn Somerset Webb, the Bank of England may be about to get lucky.
-
Rishi Sunak can’t fix all our problems – so why try?Opinion Rishi Sunak’s Spring Statement is an attempt to plaster over problems the chancellor can’t fix. So should he even bother trying, asks Merryn Somerset Webb?
-
Young people are becoming a scarce resource – we should value them more highlyOpinion In the last two years adults have been bizarrely unkind to children and young people. That doesn’t bode well for the future, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
Ask for a pay rise – everyone else isOpinion As inflation bites and the labour market remains tight, many of the nation's employees are asking for a pay rise. Merryn Somerset Webb explains why you should do that too.
-
Why central banks should stick to controlling inflationOpinion The world’s central bankers are stepping out of their traditional roles and becoming much more political. That’s a mistake, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
How St Ives became St Tropez as the recovery drives prices sky highOpinion Merryn Somerset Webb finds herself at the epicentre of Britain’s V-shaped recovery as pent-up demand flows straight into Cornwall’s restaurants and beaches.
-
The real problem of Universal Basic Income (UBI)Merryn's Blog April employment numbers showed 75 per cent fewer people in the US returned to employment compared to expectations. Merryn Somerset-Webb explains how excessive government support is causing a shortage of labour.
-
Why an ageing population is not necessarily the disaster many people think it isOpinion We’ve got used to the idea that an ageing population is a bad thing. But that’s not necessarily true, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
