Whatever Neil Woodford's record, there's no guarantee his new fund will perform
There's no denying fund manager Neil Woodford has been proved right time and again. But that's no guarantee he'll get it right this time.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Twice daily
MoneyWeek
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Four times a week
Look After My Bills
Sign up to our free money-saving newsletter, filled with the latest news and expert advice to help you find the best tips and deals for managing your bills. Start saving today!
I can't take much more of Neil Woodford. He's been promoting his new fund theWoodford Equity Income Fund absolutely relentlessly over the last few weeks. That has meant lots of press releases offering his comments on all things pharma related.
But it has also meant a torrent of press releases from every wealth management firm and stock broker he has stopped in to see on his road show around the UK.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
I know that Hargreaves Lansdown has secured the lowest fee on the new fund for Vantage investors on their platform (0.6% vs 0.65/75% elsewhere) something that goes a small way to offsetting the 0.45% platform fee they put on top.
I know that he thinks the pound is overvalued. I know that he'd soon like to launch a fund that invests only in unquoted companies. I know that he is keen to make sure that he keeps costs for investors low and that the management fee he quotes includes more costs than most others do.
I know that he isn't convinced by the strength of the UK recovery and thinks rates will be lower for even longer; that he thinks the next five years will be "challenging"; that tobacco and pharma will be key themes in his new fund, but that he will be taking high conviction holdings in smaller firms as well as large cap sectors just as he did at Invesco; that he hates most banks, but he likes HSBC; that he is targeting an income yield for the fund of around 4%; that he thinks he can get "high single digit" returns from the fund regardless of the environment; and that he believes that his "passion and energy have never been stronger" (or so he told Whitehouse Securities anyway).
I also know that he has really got the hang of this PR stuff (check out his video). But here's what I don't know how his fund will perform over the next five, ten, 15 or even 20 years.Much of the PR would have you think that outperformance is a given. But it isn't.
Defenders will say that Woodford has proved himself over and over again avoiding the tech bubble and the banking meltdown and picking up on undervalued sectors time after time.
Nonetheless, as Fundexpert.co.uk point out, while over the last ten years Woodford's Invesco Perpetual Income Fund (which he intends to more or less replicate so as to give investors "continuity") has been a top performer,over the last five years it is placed only 33rd.
Widen the comparision to include growth funds (which seems reasonable given the amount of the fund taken up by smaller companies) and over 10 years, the fund comes in 17th. Over five years, it comes in 123rd.
As Fundexpert says, "ouch". All good managers have periods of underperformance and bad luck (look no further than Anthony Bolton in China) and Woodford may soon be back on form.
But before you pile in on the back of this tsunami of publicity, it is worth remembering that you can't buy past performance only the hope of future performance.
-
ISA fund and trust picks for every type of investor – which could work for you?Whether you’re an ISA investor seeking reliable returns, looking to add a bit more risk to your portfolio or are new to investing, MoneyWeek asked the experts for funds and investment trusts you could consider in 2026
-
The most popular fund sectors of 2025 as investor outflows continueIt was another difficult year for fund inflows but there are signs that investors are returning to the financial markets
-
House prices to crash? Your house may still be making you money, but not for much longerOpinion If you’re relying on your property to fund your pension, you may have to think again. But, says Merryn Somerset Webb, if house prices start to fall there may be a silver lining.
-
Prepare your portfolio for recessionOpinion A recession is looking increasingly likely. Add in a bear market and soaring inflation, and things are going to get very complicated for investors, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
Investing for income? Here are six investment trusts to buy nowOpinion For many savers and investors, income is getting hard to find. But it's not impossible to find, says Merryn Somerset Webb. Here, she picks six investment trusts that are currently yielding more than 4%.
-
Stories are great – but investors should stick to realityOpinion Everybody loves a story – and investors are no exception. But it’s easy to get carried away, says Merryn Somerset Webb, and forget the underlying truth of the market.
-
Everything is collapsing at once – here’s what to do about itOpinion Equity and bond markets are crashing, while inflation destroys the value of cash. Merryn Somerset Webb looks at where investors can turn to protect their wealth.
-
ESG investing could end up being a classic mistakeOpinion ESG investing has been embraced with enormous speed and zeal. But think long and hard before buying in, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
UK house prices will fall – but not for a few yearsOpinion UK house prices look out of reach for many. But the truth is that British property is surprisingly affordable, says Merryn Somerset Webb. Prices will fall at some point – but not yet.
-
This isn’t the stagflationary 1970s – but neither is it the low-rate world of the 2010sOpinion With soaring energy prices and high inflation, it might seem like we’re on a fast track back to the 1970s. We’re not, says Merryn Somerset Webb. But we’re not going back to the 2010s either.
