During the run up to the Scottish referendum I wrote that I was uncomfortable with the idea that huge change could be forced by a small majority on a low turnout. It seemed to me something such as leaving the UK should be a path actively chosen by something close to a majority of eligible voters regardless of turnout.
This was the kind of system used in the Scottish referendum of 1979, when the bar was set at 40% so 40% of the total electorate had to vote Yes. That didn't happen. 51.4% of those who voted, voted Yes, but the turnout was only 64%. That meant that only 32.9% of the registered electorate had voted Yes. So the answer to the referendum was an effective "No".
This mattered, in that it attempted to take account of those who are obviously happy with the status quo but don't vote (if they weren't, they would vote) but didn't set the bar so high as to make it impossible.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
However it wasn't the system we used in the last Scottish referendum (if 50% plus one of those who voted had voted out they would have forced everyone out regardless of turnout). And it isn't the one we are using for the EU referendum.
It didn't, thank goodness, turn out to be an issue for Scotland turnout was high and the unionists won by a very comfortable majority. However there has to be concern that it will turn out to be an issue this time round: turnout could well be low (people appear to be both bored with and confused by the EU) and the polls show the result to be entirely up in the air.
However, one thing does seem clear a low turnout is likely to favour the leave campaign (more leave voters than remain voters say they are "certain" to vote).
So here's the worry: what if 51.4% of those who vote, vote to leave? But what if at the same time turnout is only 64% so that, just as in the 1979 referendum, only 32.9% of eligible voters have voted to leave? We'd have had the same results, but a different outcome (to change rather than not to change). That's something that I can't imagine Remain supporters would accept. They would say, quite rightly, that 32.9% doesn't give a proper mandate for this kind of upheaval.
Regular readers will know that I'm planning to vote to leave. They will also know that I think the idea that Brexit will lead to instant economic disaster to be nonsense and that I think a small majority in favour of leave will probably not result in Brexit (but in a genuine renegotiation with the EU).
But here's one more thing I think I think: we may well have set the referendum bar for Brexit too low.
-
RICS: Housing market continues to strengthen but 2025 could be challengingThe latest survey by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors reports a resilient UK housing market, but warns of headwinds next year
-
Bitcoin price one of the most-asked questions on Alexa - here's how to buy the cryptocurrencyAccording to figures from Amazon, which cover September 2023 to November 2024, pop star Taylor Swift and Bitcoin were named among the most popular Alexa queries of 2024
-
Beating inflation takes more luck than skill – but are we about to get lucky?Opinion The US Federal Reserve managed to beat inflation in the 1980s. But much of that was down to pure luck. Thankfully, says Merryn Somerset Webb, the Bank of England may be about to get lucky.
-
Rishi Sunak can’t fix all our problems – so why try?Opinion Rishi Sunak’s Spring Statement is an attempt to plaster over problems the chancellor can’t fix. So should he even bother trying, asks Merryn Somerset Webb?
-
Young people are becoming a scarce resource – we should value them more highlyOpinion In the last two years adults have been bizarrely unkind to children and young people. That doesn’t bode well for the future, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
Ask for a pay rise – everyone else isOpinion As inflation bites and the labour market remains tight, many of the nation's employees are asking for a pay rise. Merryn Somerset Webb explains why you should do that too.
-
Why central banks should stick to controlling inflationOpinion The world’s central bankers are stepping out of their traditional roles and becoming much more political. That’s a mistake, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
How St Ives became St Tropez as the recovery drives prices sky highOpinion Merryn Somerset Webb finds herself at the epicentre of Britain’s V-shaped recovery as pent-up demand flows straight into Cornwall’s restaurants and beaches.
-
The real problem of Universal Basic Income (UBI)Merryn's Blog April employment numbers showed 75 per cent fewer people in the US returned to employment compared to expectations. Merryn Somerset-Webb explains how excessive government support is causing a shortage of labour.
-
Why an ageing population is not necessarily the disaster many people think it isOpinion We’ve got used to the idea that an ageing population is a bad thing. But that’s not necessarily true, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
