Did you miss out on the SpaceX IPO?
Despite the hype in recent weeks around SpaceX's blockbuster IPO, the window of opportunity for investors will remain beyond SPCX’s first day
Did you miss out on the SpaceX initial public offering (IPO)? Perhaps you missed the cutoff altogether or failed to get your desired allocation of shares, given its fourfold oversubscription? In either case, you can still look forward to subsequent opportunities to get involved in the investment story de jour.
While most IPOs trigger a period of volatility the expectation with this one is that it will be sharper and more protracted. Given the huge level of attention, limited allocation available to UK retail investors and the staggered timeline for expected trading (selling as lockups expire and buying as the underlying indices of various tracker funds bring the stock onto their benchmarks), investors can expect swings in SpaceX’s share price to continue through the second half of the year, at least.
Lynn Hutchinson, head of ETF and index solutions at Charles Stanley, said: “It’s [not only] one of the most talked about stocks of the last few months but retail investors quite like a new stock becoming available. Plus it’s got the ‘Elon Musk factor’ – who has a huge retail fanbase as well, albeit not across the board. Many investors have wanted access to this company for years.”
Try 6 free issues of MoneyWeek today
Get unparalleled financial insight, analysis and expert opinion you can profit from.
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Multiple buying opportunities as shares are released
Funds tracking the Nasdaq-100 will be among the first index funds to include SpaceX, in line with newly amended rules.
These include fast-tracked entry, allowing inclusion to Nasdaq’s flagship index fund 15 days after an IPO instead of the previous window of three months, and removal of its minimum float requirements. A three times multiplier will be introduced; rather than the currently tradable market cap – or free-float – of $75 billion, the stock will be weighted based on a market cap of $225 billion, which could force passive investors to chase the stock, further fuelling volatility across the index as a whole.
Index providers MSCI and FTSE Russell will include SpaceX after 10 and five trading days, respectively.
S&P 500 index funds will include SpaceX later after S&P Dow Jones Indices confirmed it won’t fast-track the company’s inclusion in the index.
“There will be an initial dash for the shares because of the limited availability but after that, the next release will likely be after Q2 earnings, so more shares will likely come on between July and September, if indeed the holders (employees and early investors) decide to sell them,” said Hutchinson.
Early investors, staff and other insiders are subject to staged lockups to manage supply and demand, she added.
“It looks like it will be staged, with some released earlier, and the full lockup expiration after 180 days. We expect it will be staggered and therefore volatile for several months yet.”
She said clients had been in touch asking whether they should sell the Nasdaq in favour of something else. But she warned investors not to get carried away, reminding that the allocations within many of these funds would be tiny, given the 5% expected free-float stock being made available.
“Perhaps as it gets further along and if the stock’s still really volatile, it might make more of a difference. But at the moment we’re looking at, in some cases, 0.2% to 1% depending on which index it’s going into because there’s not enough free-float available.”
Hutchinson urged investors to think about the underlying inclusion criteria, whether they’re looking at a broader index fund or a specialist thematic exchange-traded fund (ETF).
“The VanEck Space Innovators ETF (LON: JEDG) is the largest space ETF by assets under management, which you’d expect [SpaceX] to go in, but it’s unlikely to go into that until September because it’s got a 10% requirement of free-float, and there won’t be 10%. It will go in at some stage, and I guess they’ll look at it around September again.”
Speaking to MoneyWeek, Moritz Henkel, product manager at VanEck EU, concurred; the company said it will wait until the September review before deciding if SpaceX will be added to the ETF, subject to it meeting the criteria at that time.
“There will be no pre-IPO or super fast-track inclusion, nor rule change,” he said.
From a governance perspective, his team believes any new company should be assessed against the full set of index rules, not on an ad hoc basis, especially because increased volatility makes it more difficult to find a fair price in the beginning.
“For us, it’s more important to stick to defined rules and have a consistent rules-based exposure than to chase this early onboarding of SpaceX.”
Elon Musk and his team have blazed the trail, bringing a government industry into the private sphere as a commercially viable ecosystem. Henkel said the reusable Falcon boosters were a turning point, dramatically lowering launch costs and enabling new space companies, seen in the proliferation of IPOs and special purpose acquisition companies (also known as SPACs) coming to market.
Yet much still depends on launch execution, R&D and mission reliability. As SpaceX transitions to public markets it will essentially rerate the whole sector, bringing greater transparency, investor scrutiny and pressure to meet deadlines, amplifying its successes and failures.
“We’ve seen much hype and the current growth estimates are obviously very ambitious. But we’re talking about decades, not months for their business strategies.”
He said the focus on risk is a real point of difference, which was highlighted in the IPO prospectus.
“A couple of failed missions may only have a small impact to the balance sheet – even though they are very costly – but they’re potentially having a much larger effect on the actual stock price. Failed missions lead to decreased investor confidence in the technical abilities, which can cause you to lose trust.
“When we’re looking at SpaceX in the coming months and years, and capabilities of meeting deadlines, and commitments they’ve communicated to the open market, these are now more pressured because they are in the public market.”
Where will the money come from for this massive IPO?
Several reports cite JPMorgan’s estimates that roughly $95 billion worth of holdings – likely in the big tech names – will be sold off to accommodate new positions in SpaceX.
In her blog last week, Boring Money’s Holly Mackay makes a similar point: “If large investors want to buy in, they will need to free up cash by selling other holdings. They might take some profits from high-performing shares like Nvidia, so I’d expect some knock-on volatility in other shares which have had strong gains so far this year.”
What other IPOs have shown parallels to SpaceX?
While the hype may be comparable to Google’s IPO back in 2014, the reality for those trying to participate in a hugely popular public listing may more closely mirror that seen when Royal Mail floated in October 2013, with a seven times oversubscription.
Jeremy Fawcett, head of Platforum – a retail investment consultancy – said Royal Mail was the last big one in the UK, comparable to the government sell-offs during the move to privatisation in the 1980s.
If the amount you actually buy is significantly lower than what you’d hoped for, by the time you come to sell, taking into account trading fees and foreign exchange, you have to really think about how much you end up with.
“There’s a huge amount of uncertainty… if you remember the 2012 Olympics, we all applied for hundreds of tickets. And most people got nothing. So you get excited because you think, ‘I put my money on the line’, and then you get very little out of it.”
