Qualcomm could acquire rival Intel – but securing the deal won't be easy
A tie-up between Qualcomm and its semiconductor rival Intel would be a coup. But multiple regulatory and commercial hurdles lie ahead.
Shares in Intel jumped by 8% last week following reports that chipmaker Qualcomm had approached its struggling rival about a potential takeover, says the Financial Times. A deal is “far from certain” and no formal offer has been made, but a tie-up would eclipse Microsoft’s $69 billion acquisition of Activision as the biggest technology deal on record. Intel’s share price has halved this year, putting the company on the defensive.
Such a deal would be a “massive coup” for Qualcomm, which re-entered the desktop processor market this year as a part of Microsoft’s artificial intelligence (AI) PC strategy after “years of dominance in mobile processors”, say Richard Lawler and Sean Hollister in The Verge.
By contrast, Intel is “arguably in its weakest position in years”, with the company recently announcing big cuts, strategic shifts and a 15% downsizing of its workforce this August after reporting a $1.6 billion loss in the second quarter of 2024. The group later announced that it would spin off its chip-making business, “a part of the company that it had long touted as a strength over rival AMD”.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
What hurdles is Qualcomm facing?
The “yawning gap” between their market values, with Qualcomm worth double Intel’s value, gives Qualcomm an “opening” to pull off a deal, says Bloomberg’s Chris Hughes. It would help Qualcomm diversify its business.
However, many obstacles to a successful transaction remain, not least the fact that neither Intel’s management nor its shareholders will be willing to “play ball” when the share price is “on its knees” unless there is “a very high premium or certain value creation on offer through trading into the enlarged company”. What’s more, asset sales will be required to assuage antitrust regulators – they would probably take place at “fire-sale” prices.
While Qualcomm would probably be required to sell off parts of Intel’s business to deal with antitrust concerns, it would probably also be forced to continue to “shovel ever-more money” into Intel’s manufacturing operations, says Robert Cyran for Breakingviews. These have become a “money pit”, generating $4.2 billion of revenue last quarter but losing $2.8 billion. The US government has made these operations “a cornerstone of its chip strategy, awarding Intel billions in subsidies”. Overall, while Intel’s lower valuation clearly has Qualcomm (and others) “salivating”, this “isn’t the screaming deal it might seem.
Any buyer would need the ability to “solve multiple existential threats” while also “getting such a deal through regulators that would include China”, says Dan Gallagher in The Wall Street Journal. But “questionable deals still have a way of happening”.
No wonder then, that Intel, even in its “current predicament”, is “drawing all types of interest”. For instance, distressed investment specialist Apollo Global Management has offered to buy an equity stake of up to $5 billion, which could be a more plausible scenario than a deal with Qualcomm given Intel’s cash needs and “less likelihood of regulatory hurdles”.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
Related stories
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.

-
How to profit from defence stocks beyond EuropeOpinion Tom Bailey, head of research for the Future of Defence Indo-Pac ex-China UCITS ETF, picks three defence stocks where he'd put his money
-
Why the Waspi women are wrong'Opinion Compensation for the Waspi women would mean using an unaffordable sledgehammer to crack a nut, says David Prosser
-
The global defence boom has moved beyond Europe – here’s how to profitOpinion Tom Bailey, head of research for the Future of Defence Indo-Pac ex-China UCITS ETF, picks three defence stocks where he'd put his money
-
Profit from a return to the office with WorkspaceWorkspace is an unloved play on the real estate investment trust sector as demand for flexible office space rises
-
New frontiers: the future of cybersecurity and how to investMatthew Partridge reviews the key trends in the cybersecurity sector and how to profit
-
An “existential crisis” for investment trusts? We’ve heard it all before in the 70sOpinion Those fearing for the future of investment trusts should remember what happened 50 years ago, says Max King
-
8 of the best properties for sale with wildlife pondsThe best properties for sale with wildlife ponds – from a 16th-century house in the Ashdown Forest, to a property on Pembrokeshire’s Preseli Hills
-
Why a copper crunch is loomingMiners are not investing in new copper supply despite rising demand from electrification of the economy, says Cris Sholto Heaton
-
Where to look for Christmas gifts for collectors“Buy now” marketplaces are rich hunting grounds when it comes to buying Christmas gifts for collectors, says Chris Carter
-
No peace dividend in Trump's Ukraine planOpinion An end to fighting in Ukraine will hurt defence shares in the short term, but the boom is likely to continue given US isolationism, says Matthew Lynn