Shares in Intel jumped by 8% last week following reports that chipmaker Qualcomm had approached its struggling rival about a potential takeover, says the Financial Times. A deal is “far from certain” and no formal offer has been made, but a tie-up would eclipse Microsoft’s $69 billion acquisition of Activision as the biggest technology deal on record. Intel’s share price has halved this year, putting the company on the defensive.
Such a deal would be a “massive coup” for Qualcomm, which re-entered the desktop processor market this year as a part of Microsoft’s artificial intelligence (AI) PC strategy after “years of dominance in mobile processors”, say Richard Lawler and Sean Hollister in The Verge.
By contrast, Intel is “arguably in its weakest position in years”, with the company recently announcing big cuts, strategic shifts and a 15% downsizing of its workforce this August after reporting a $1.6 billion loss in the second quarter of 2024. The group later announced that it would spin off its chip-making business, “a part of the company that it had long touted as a strength over rival AMD”.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
What hurdles is Qualcomm facing?
The “yawning gap” between their market values, with Qualcomm worth double Intel’s value, gives Qualcomm an “opening” to pull off a deal, says Bloomberg’s Chris Hughes. It would help Qualcomm diversify its business.
However, many obstacles to a successful transaction remain, not least the fact that neither Intel’s management nor its shareholders will be willing to “play ball” when the share price is “on its knees” unless there is “a very high premium or certain value creation on offer through trading into the enlarged company”. What’s more, asset sales will be required to assuage antitrust regulators – they would probably take place at “fire-sale” prices.
While Qualcomm would probably be required to sell off parts of Intel’s business to deal with antitrust concerns, it would probably also be forced to continue to “shovel ever-more money” into Intel’s manufacturing operations, says Robert Cyran for Breakingviews. These have become a “money pit”, generating $4.2 billion of revenue last quarter but losing $2.8 billion. The US government has made these operations “a cornerstone of its chip strategy, awarding Intel billions in subsidies”. Overall, while Intel’s lower valuation clearly has Qualcomm (and others) “salivating”, this “isn’t the screaming deal it might seem.
Any buyer would need the ability to “solve multiple existential threats” while also “getting such a deal through regulators that would include China”, says Dan Gallagher in The Wall Street Journal. But “questionable deals still have a way of happening”.
No wonder then, that Intel, even in its “current predicament”, is “drawing all types of interest”. For instance, distressed investment specialist Apollo Global Management has offered to buy an equity stake of up to $5 billion, which could be a more plausible scenario than a deal with Qualcomm given Intel’s cash needs and “less likelihood of regulatory hurdles”.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
Related stories
-
Rightmove: UK asking prices hit record high but Britain enters buyer’s marketHigher property taxes are stifling the typically-busy spring selling season and buyers are benefiting from more choice, meaning sellers must price their homes more competitively
-
Inheritance tax reforms: government urged to rethink curbs on rural reliefsMPs want the government to delay changes to inheritance rax reliefs for farmers
-
'Pension funds shouldn't be pushed into private equity sector'Opinion The private-equity party is over, so don't push pension funds into the sector, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
Greg Abel: Warren Buffett’s heir takes the throneGreg Abel is considered a safe pair of hands as he takes centre stage at Berkshire Hathaway. But he arrives after one of the hardest acts to follow in investment history, Warren Buffett. Can he thrive?
-
Who will be the next Warren Buffett?Opinion There won’t be another Warren Buffett. Times have changed, and the opportunities are no longer there, says Matthew Lynn.
-
Will Comstock crash – or soar?Opinion The upside for Comstock, a solar panel-recycling and biomass-refining group, dwarfs the downside, says Dominic Frisby.
-
'As AGMs go digital, firms must offer a new form of scrutiny for shareholders'Opinion Technology has rendered big AGM meet-ups obsolete, but the board still needs to be held to account, says Matthew Lynn
-
Unilever braces for inflation amid tariff uncertainty – what does it mean for investors?Consumer-goods giant Unilever has made steady progress simplifying its operations. Will tariffs now cause turbulence?
-
Two ways to tap into monopoly profits from airportsMost investors can’t get their hands on airports. Here are two ways you can
-
Fat profits: should you invest in weight-loss drugs?The latest weight-loss treatments could transform public health and the world economy. Should you invest?
