Qualcomm could acquire rival Intel – but securing the deal won't be easy
A tie-up between Qualcomm and its semiconductor rival Intel would be a coup. But multiple regulatory and commercial hurdles lie ahead.


Shares in Intel jumped by 8% last week following reports that chipmaker Qualcomm had approached its struggling rival about a potential takeover, says the Financial Times. A deal is “far from certain” and no formal offer has been made, but a tie-up would eclipse Microsoft’s $69 billion acquisition of Activision as the biggest technology deal on record. Intel’s share price has halved this year, putting the company on the defensive.
Such a deal would be a “massive coup” for Qualcomm, which re-entered the desktop processor market this year as a part of Microsoft’s artificial intelligence (AI) PC strategy after “years of dominance in mobile processors”, say Richard Lawler and Sean Hollister in The Verge.
By contrast, Intel is “arguably in its weakest position in years”, with the company recently announcing big cuts, strategic shifts and a 15% downsizing of its workforce this August after reporting a $1.6 billion loss in the second quarter of 2024. The group later announced that it would spin off its chip-making business, “a part of the company that it had long touted as a strength over rival AMD”.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
What hurdles is Qualcomm facing?
The “yawning gap” between their market values, with Qualcomm worth double Intel’s value, gives Qualcomm an “opening” to pull off a deal, says Bloomberg’s Chris Hughes. It would help Qualcomm diversify its business.
However, many obstacles to a successful transaction remain, not least the fact that neither Intel’s management nor its shareholders will be willing to “play ball” when the share price is “on its knees” unless there is “a very high premium or certain value creation on offer through trading into the enlarged company”. What’s more, asset sales will be required to assuage antitrust regulators – they would probably take place at “fire-sale” prices.
While Qualcomm would probably be required to sell off parts of Intel’s business to deal with antitrust concerns, it would probably also be forced to continue to “shovel ever-more money” into Intel’s manufacturing operations, says Robert Cyran for Breakingviews. These have become a “money pit”, generating $4.2 billion of revenue last quarter but losing $2.8 billion. The US government has made these operations “a cornerstone of its chip strategy, awarding Intel billions in subsidies”. Overall, while Intel’s lower valuation clearly has Qualcomm (and others) “salivating”, this “isn’t the screaming deal it might seem.
Any buyer would need the ability to “solve multiple existential threats” while also “getting such a deal through regulators that would include China”, says Dan Gallagher in The Wall Street Journal. But “questionable deals still have a way of happening”.
No wonder then, that Intel, even in its “current predicament”, is “drawing all types of interest”. For instance, distressed investment specialist Apollo Global Management has offered to buy an equity stake of up to $5 billion, which could be a more plausible scenario than a deal with Qualcomm given Intel’s cash needs and “less likelihood of regulatory hurdles”.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
Related stories
Sign up for MoneyWeek's newsletters
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.

Matthew graduated from the University of Durham in 2004; he then gained an MSc, followed by a PhD at the London School of Economics.
He has previously written for a wide range of publications, including the Guardian and the Economist, and also helped to run a newsletter on terrorism. He has spent time at Lehman Brothers, Citigroup and the consultancy Lombard Street Research.
Matthew is the author of Superinvestors: Lessons from the greatest investors in history, published by Harriman House, which has been translated into several languages. His second book, Investing Explained: The Accessible Guide to Building an Investment Portfolio, is published by Kogan Page.
As senior writer, he writes the shares and politics & economics pages, as well as weekly Blowing It and Great Frauds in History columns He also writes a fortnightly reviews page and trading tips, as well as regular cover stories and multi-page investment focus features.
Follow Matthew on Twitter: @DrMatthewPartri
-
What did Rachel Reeves announce in the Spending Review?
Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced budget increases for some departments, including a £29 billion annual injection for the NHS, but others will see cuts. What was announced in the Labour Spending Review, and what does it mean for your money?
-
Divorce financial settlement fights surge – why it pays to agree terms early
Lawyers expect more court battles as tax rises and sharp falls in asset values make divorcing financially more difficult.
-
Who’s driving Tesla?
As Elon Musk steps back from government with his eyes on the stars, investors ask if he’s still behind the wheel at his electric-car maker.
-
Investment opportunities in the world of Coca-Cola
There is far more to Coca-Cola than just one giant firm. The companies that bottle and distribute the ubiquitous soft drink are promising investments in their own right.
-
Streaming services are the new magic money tree for investors – but for how long?
Opinion Streaming services are in full bloom and laden with profits, but beware – winter is coming, warns Matthew Lynn
-
'Pension funds shouldn't be pushed into private equity sector'
Opinion The private-equity party is over, so don't push pension funds into the sector, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
Greg Abel: Warren Buffett’s heir takes the throne
Greg Abel is considered a safe pair of hands as he takes centre stage at Berkshire Hathaway. But he arrives after one of the hardest acts to follow in investment history, Warren Buffett. Can he thrive?
-
Who will be the next Warren Buffett?
Opinion There won’t be another Warren Buffett. Times have changed, and the opportunities are no longer there, says Matthew Lynn.
-
Will Comstock crash – or soar?
Opinion The upside for Comstock, a solar panel-recycling and biomass-refining group, dwarfs the downside, says Dominic Frisby.
-
'As AGMs go digital, firms must offer a new form of scrutiny for shareholders'
Opinion Technology has rendered big AGM meet-ups obsolete, but the board still needs to be held to account, says Matthew Lynn