When it comes to investing, sticking with what we know makes sense, especially in uncertain times (which seem to be all the time). As I am British, UK stocks seem familiar to me. The largest is AstraZeneca – everyone knows AstraZeneca. The second-biggest is HSBC, followed by GlaxoSmithKline. These are companies we can feel comfortable with, you might think; no need to look further.
In its 2018 European Asset Allocation Survey of institutional investors, Mercer, the investment consultant, found that UK investors keep 28% of their equity allocation in British markets (compared with the UK’s 4% weighting in global equity indices) and it’s the same for Europeans generally, with a 38% allocation to home equity markets.
A global footprint
AstraZeneca’s US revenue is 80% higher than its European revenue. Almost 50% of HSBC’s revenue comes from Asia, and it’s a similar story at GlaxoSmithKline. So we are more familiar with international markets than we thought.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
The problem is that the FTSE 100 is skewed away from highly profitable, or “quality” companies. The largest ten companies in the UK market have an average expected “post-Covid-19” return on equity (ROE, a key gauge of profitability) of 23%. The largest ten in the MSCI World Index, a broader global index, have an average expected post-Covid-19 ROE of 38%.
Over the last decade the MSCI World Quality Index has outperformed MSCI World by almost 90% and the FTSE 100 by almost 195%. For the ten years before that, MSCI World Quality beat MSCI World by 14%, but in the decade before that the gap was 309%. So buying “quality” works, but buying British doesn’t seem to be a “quality” buy.
The companies on the UK market are not generally of the quality that can generate good long-term investment returns. Unilever is listed in London and is a very good company, but how about looking at a company like Mastercard, which we are all familiar with?
“Quality” does not simply mean “growth”. Many of the top-performing funds over the last few years have focused on rapidly-growing companies but the inverse correlation of “growth” stocks’ returns with bond yields is clear. Should inflation come back, bond yields are likely to rise, reflecting falling bond prices. “Quality” has stood the test of time whereas “growth” is likely to suffer if bond yields rise (higher interest rates temper growth).
Three top tips
Here are three global stocks that we think are “quality”, but not necessarily “growth”. One is Inditex (Madrid: ITX). This is the Spanish company behind Zara. Naturally the pandemic has affected sales, but it has a strong balance sheet and a growing online business.
Then there is Novo Nordisk (Copenhagen: NOVO-B), a Danish diabetes-treatment maker with a terrific record on environmental, social and governance issues and a head-start on the competition in oral-diabetes treatments. Finally, Pepsico (Nasdaq: PEP) is a high-quality soft-drinks, snacks and foods maker whose brands include Quaker Oats and Pepsi Cola. Its ROE and history of dividend payments are both attractive.
-
MoneyWeek's best calls of the last 25 yearsFrom the early days of the gold bull market and the credit crunch to the advent of populism and post-Covid inflation, MoneyWeek has made some excellent calls
-
8 of the best historic properties for sale nowThe best historic properties for sale – from a 9th-century castle in Italy at the foot of the Alps to a manor house in Suffolk once given to Anne of Cleeves by Henry VIII
-
MoneyWeek's best calls of the last 25 years – the key trends we got right
From the early days of the gold bull market and the credit crunch to the advent of populism and post-Covid inflation, MoneyWeek has made some excellent calls
-
'How I brought MoneyWeek to the masses'Launching MoneyWeek gave ordinary investors information – and hence power, says Merryn Somerset Webb
-
'Why I launched MoneyWeek'Inspired by The Week and uninspired by the financial press, Jolyon Connell decided it was time for a new venture. That's where MoneyWeek came in
-
'My predictions for the next 25 years'Opinion What will the world look like when MoneyWeek celebrates its 50th birthday? Matthew Lynn shares his predictions
-
How have central banks evolved in the last century – and are they still fit for purpose?The rise to power and dominance of the central banks has been a key theme in MoneyWeek in its 25 years. Has their rule been benign?
-
What MoneyWeek has learnt in the last 25 yearsFinancial markets have suffered two huge bear markets and a pandemic since MoneyWeek launched. Alex Rankine reviews key trends and lessons from a turbulent time
-
The Stella Show is still on the road – can Stella Li keep it that way?Stella Li is the globe-trotting ambassador for Chinese electric-car company BYD, which has grown into a world leader. Can she keep the motor running?
-
Global investors have overlooked these solid stocks going for growthOpinion Nisha Thakrar, investment specialist at Nedgroup Investments, selects three undervalued stocks with long-term growth potential
