Shell shells out a little more to investors as it restores its dividend
Oil giant Royal Dutch Shell has partially restored its dividend. Income investors will be pleased, but has the group got its timing wrong? Matthew Partridge reports


In April Shell slashed its dividend for the first time since World War II. Now, however, even though third-quarter profits were down by 80% year-on-year, it has decided to reverse course to some extent, say Simon Foy and Rachel Millard in The Daily Telegraph. Shell has raised its quarterly dividend, although it is still two-thirds lower than its pre-crisis level. The group has justified the move by arguing that the “lower operating expenses, well write-offs, depreciation and strong marketing margins” mean that it now has enough cash flow to “expand while also raising shareholder payouts”.
The decision to restore the dividend partially suggests that Shell’s management is aware that the huge cut in the spring, in order to enable “significant investment” in clean-energy resources, may have “upset existing shareholders”, says Rochelle Toplensky in The Wall Street Journal. With the company “nowhere near far enough down the path of energy transition” to attract enough environmental investors to compensate for the lost income investors, it has found itself stuck between two stools. It’s no wonder that Shell’s share price is down by 60% this year, “underperforming European oil and gas peers, which have fallen 46%”.
Will the stock bounce?
Shell may be hoping that a slight increase to its dividend will help it “woo investors and reverse the downward slide in its share price”, which is now “languishing at 25-year lows”, says Louise Lucas in the Financial Times. However, such a “short-term” strategy is likely to prove “short-sighted”, especially given the “far from conducive backdrop”, with oil prices “skittering” and the economic toil of coronavirus “adding further pressure”.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Instead of returning more cash to shareholders, it should be using the money to speed up its attempts to reshape itself as a “climate-friendly carbon-neutral company”. Shell is not alone in this dilemma, say Laura Hurst and Javier Blas on Bloomberg. Every major oil company is walking a “treacherous path”, torn between shareholder demands for “generous and reliable dividends”, and the longer-term need “to shift into renewable energy”. To make matters worse, there is “scant evidence” that clean energy can generate “comparable returns to the traditional oil and gas business”. BP is in a similar bind.
Sensible or not, Shell’s dividend raise has been welcomed by “cash-starved investors”, says Simon Freeman in the Evening Standard. The share price jumped by 5% on the news. Shell’s decision to raise its dividend is the latest sign that the rate of cancelled and cut dividends has been “gradually arrested” over the past few months. Year-to-date total payments have reached £36bn across the FTSE 350, up from £33.5bn in July – though still much less than the expected annual average of around £70bn.
Sign up for MoneyWeek's newsletters
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Matthew graduated from the University of Durham in 2004; he then gained an MSc, followed by a PhD at the London School of Economics.
He has previously written for a wide range of publications, including the Guardian and the Economist, and also helped to run a newsletter on terrorism. He has spent time at Lehman Brothers, Citigroup and the consultancy Lombard Street Research.
Matthew is the author of Superinvestors: Lessons from the greatest investors in history, published by Harriman House, which has been translated into several languages. His second book, Investing Explained: The Accessible Guide to Building an Investment Portfolio, is published by Kogan Page.
As senior writer, he writes the shares and politics & economics pages, as well as weekly Blowing It and Great Frauds in History columns He also writes a fortnightly reviews page and trading tips, as well as regular cover stories and multi-page investment focus features.
Follow Matthew on Twitter: @DrMatthewPartri
-
Digital Services Tax: will Reeves let big tech off lightly to avoid tariffs?
Rumours are circulating that the Digital Services Tax on big tech companies could be cut as Rachel Reeves seeks to appeal to president Trump
By Dan McEvoy Published
-
Rachel Reeves set to increase penalties for filing tax returns late
The Chancellor will announce hikes to penalties for late tax returns in her Spring Statement as she scrambles to raise an extra £1 billion a year. Here’s what you need to know
By Daniel Hilton Published
-
Weight-loss drugs could revolutionise the economy – the investments to buy now
The new generation of weight-loss drugs are a boon for the overweight, but they also promise to change our relationship with food and revolutionise the economy
By Dr Matthew Partridge Published
-
Find tomorrow’s Asian giants while they are still smaller companies
Opinion Nitin Bajaj, portfolio manager of the Fidelity Asian Values trust, picks three Asian companies to invest in.
By Nitin Bajaj Published
-
AI will maintain Moody’s market lead, says Stephen Connolly
Opinion Veteran data provider Moody's has adapted well to the modern world, and is one of Warren Buffett’s longest-held investments
By Stephen Connolly Published
-
Is BlackRock World Mining gearing for a recovery?
Opinion After a frustrating year, BlackRock World Mining is positioned for growth and to capitalise on the sector's recovery
By Rupert Hargreaves Published
-
Should you limit exposure to US tech stocks?
An end to the AI boom would shake both US funds and global trackers. Here’s one way to trim exposure to US tech stocks
By Cris Sholto Heaton Published
-
The mystery of America’s gold and why an audit matters
How much gold does the US actually have? Dominic Frisby explains why it matters
By Dominic Frisby Published
-
Art vs AI: artists’ uprising takes on the bots
AI performs impressively, but it’s all based on human work that was taken without payment. The government thinks this is fine. Copyright holders beg to differ
By Simon Wilson Published
-
The benefits of a stock bubble
Opinion We tend to think of stock bubbles as bad things but, as the dotcom craze shows, good things can come from them, says Matthew Lynn
By Matthew Lynn Published