Is Bayer a bargain stock despite the litigation surrounding Roundup?
The German chemicals group Bayer’s lawsuits over its Roundup weedkiller could throttle its profits. But is the gloom overdone? Matthew Partridge reports
“Only hours away” from another jury trial over its weedkiller Roundup, Germany’s Bayer has secured a postponement to allow room for “escalating settlement talks” to continue, reports Laura Kusisto and Ruth Bender in The Wall Street Journal.
This has raised hopes that Bayer may be close to settling claims related to allegations that Roundup causes cancer, which have already caused Bayer to lose three individual cases, leaving it liable for a total of $190.5m in compensation. A fourth adverse verdict could have handed the 42,000 plaintiffs involved so far “additional ammunition in settlement talks that have dragged on for months”.
A settlement won’t come cheap, says Fortune. Experts believe that settling the “tens of thousands” of claims, which could eventually rise to as much as 85,000, could cost around $10bn, with some even putting the costs at $13bn.
The lower estimate would imply $8bn to resolve current cases and $2bn set aside for future claims, including those related to diseases such as non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma “which can take years to diagnose”. There’s also the problem of trying to simultaneously negotiate with the various groups of plantiffs’ attorneys, “each with a sizable inventory of cases”.
The fact that Bayer’s shares rose by 4% on the news of the postponement suggests there is a risk that shareholders’ expectations “are getting carried away”, says Chris Hughes on Bloomberg. There remains a “real possibility” that the “saga” endures for longer than investors have anticipated if talks between the two sides break down. Indeed, given that Bayer still believes that Roundup doesn’t cause cancer, it could simply decide that it would be better off taking a chance on a trial if an acceptable figure cannot be reached.
The positive scenario
However, if a deal does end up being signed then shareholders could stand to do very well, as the chemical giant currently still trades at a “substantial discount” to its peers. The gap is worth “much more” than the settlement costs being discussed.
Just getting to a valuation matching its cheapest counterparts “would add about €20bn of market value, after deducting the estimated cost of ending litigation”, while a move toward the average of its peer group would see the market value rise even higher.
Shareholders may be relieved at the “fairly modest” settlement, say Ed Cropley and Aimee Donnellan on Breakingviews. Still, they are still entitled to be “hopping mad” at the fact that Bayer got itself into the mess in the first place by buying Monsanto (which originally developed the drug) for $66bn in 2018. A Bayer investor who bought shares when the deal with Monsanto was completed would still have lost nearly 20% of their stake today, while those who invested in other drug companies would have made big profits. Bayer CEO Werner Baumann “has a lot of work to do” to ensure that Bayer’s shares close the gap.