Markets are starting to realise just how bad the coronavirus crisis will be

As governments around the world throw everything including the kitchen sink in the fight against coronavirus, markets are reaching the “moment of maximum panic”. John Stepek explains what that means for you.

Markets are looking a bit peaky again this morning. Why? You can probably blame the US.

The UK and most of Europe – even Germany – is getting close to pulling out all the stops to throw as much money at this problem as it takes (and more). The US was expected to follow suit. But just as with the financial crisis, politics is holding things up.

The government is throwing everything it can at this – the US will follow

On Friday, in the UK, chancellor Rishi Sunak made the radical declaration that the government will pay 80% of the wages of staff who would otherwise be laid off by businesses.

That’s quite incredible and we’ll devote more time to it in this week’s MoneyWeek (we’re going to be ramping up our small business coverage during this period as I’m guessing a lot of you are going to need it – if you don’t subscribe already you can get your first six issues free here, which is plenty of time to work out whether you find us useful or not).

Meanwhile, Germany – notoriously tight-fisted or fiscally prudent, depending on your point of view – has said that it will take on €130bn in new debt and create a €500bn bailout fund, throwing said fiscal caution to the winds. In total, this rescue package will amount to about 10% of German GDP.

If Germany is planning to spend whatever it takes, you can be sure that means the rest of Europe (the ones who haven’t already) will leap at the chance.

Long story short, governments generally are throwing all that they can at this thing.

However, as always, the most important player in all this is the US. And just as happened in 2008, the US is getting a bit bogged down in the politics. That’s because everyone wants a little bit of the bailout.

Everyone has a special interest group to protect and everyone has some sort of principled reason for standing against whatever goes through Congress until their special interest group is handed a little bit of the pie.

The US has a stimulus package which is meant to be worth $2trn sitting waiting to go through. The risk, as far as Democrats go, is that there is too much “no questions asked” money going on bailing out big businesses (an objection I’d almost always have sympathy with).

The main moves are as follows: small businesses get loans so they can keep workers on; US households get direct payments worth $3,000 for a family of four; and there will be as much as $500bn for big companies, plus another $50bn for airlines.

The Democrats want this to be more transparent than it is and they also want restrictions on share buybacks and CEO pay packages.

Anyway, odds are it’ll get pushed through some time today – playing politics is one thing but if this doesn’t get pushed through people are going to get fed up and start blaming whichever party can be painted as the blockers.

What does this mean for markets?

So what does all of this mean for markets?

A couple of things are clear. One, we’re getting close to the point where the authorities will be underwriting the vast majority of businesses for the duration of the lockdown crisis. There will still be a lot of people and firms who fall through the cracks, but the mass bankruptcy scenario is starting to recede.

Two, I agree with John Authers of Bloomberg when he argues that the “moment of maximum panic is close at hand.”

People are now talking about some absolutely horrendous outcomes – 30% unemployment in the US, plus a jump in weekly jobless claims to three million this week (that’s up from below 300,000 last week and close to 200,000 for the last two years or so).

Those might not be exaggerations but they can’t get a lot worse than that. If this stuff is being talked about loudly then you know that the market is getting closer to getting ahead of the bad news rather than constantly playing catch up.

However, you then have what you might call the “long, slow grind lower” phase that follows the point of maximum panic. There is less of a sense of collective horror, but the news still continues to get worse and worse.

We also still have the very real risk that something is going to blow up in markets, mainly the corporate debt bubble. I’m thinking and assuming that this can and will be underwritten by the Federal Reserve and its partner central banks around the globe – but Jerome Powell is going to be running around like one of those plumbers in an old cartoon, plugging leaks left, right and centre.

What’s my point? Don’t be in a rush to buy or to sell. Take your time. Build a watch list or review the one you currently have. Look at who will survive and thrive, look at who is going to struggle, and consider who might be struggling now but is likely to benefit greatly when the lockdown period is over (and it will end at some point – China is getting back to work, despite the risks of second waves of infection).

We’ll have a lot more on this in the next issue of MoneyWeek magazine. Get your first six issues free here.

Recommended

Whether it’s cryptocurrencies or investment trusts, make sure you know what you’re investing in
Investment strategy

Whether it’s cryptocurrencies or investment trusts, make sure you know what you’re investing in

Many people scoff at cryptocurrency speculators pouring money into an asset they may barely understand. But the same could be said of investors in man…
26 Jan 2022
How to invest in energy and metals as tech stocks crash
Commodities

How to invest in energy and metals as tech stocks crash

It’s been a terrible week for stockmarkets. But not everything is crashing – “real” assets such as metals and energy are holding up well and should ha…
26 Jan 2022
Shareholder capitalism: the world’s most powerful asset manager wants you to have your say
ESG investing

Shareholder capitalism: the world’s most powerful asset manager wants you to have your say

Under shareholder capitalism, the owners of the companies the big fund managers invest in are us – yet our voice is rarely heard. Now one asset manage…
26 Jan 2022
Julian Brigden: markets are at a huge inflexion point
Investment strategy

Julian Brigden: markets are at a huge inflexion point

Merryn talks to Julian Brigden of Macro Intelligence 2 Partners about the unwinding of the US stockmarket's super-bubble, and the risks and opportunit…
25 Jan 2022

Most Popular

Shareholder capitalism: why we must return power to listed companies’ ultimate owners
Investment strategy

Shareholder capitalism: why we must return power to listed companies’ ultimate owners

Under our system of shareholder capitalism it's not fund managers, it‘s the individual investors – the company's ultimate owners – who should be telli…
24 Jan 2022
Three innovative Asian stocks to buy now
Share tips

Three innovative Asian stocks to buy now

Professional investor Fay Ren of the Cerno Pacific Fund highlights three of her favourite Asian stocks to buy now
24 Jan 2022
Temple Bar’s Ian Lance and Nick Purves: the essence of value investing
Investment strategy

Temple Bar’s Ian Lance and Nick Purves: the essence of value investing

Ian Lance and Nick Purves of the Temple Bar investment trust explain the essence of “value investing” – buying something for less than its intrinsic v…
14 Jan 2022