In the first week of September, there were two major acquisitions in the real estate investment trust (Reit) sector. First, warehouse owner Segro paid £1.1 billion to acquire Tritax EuroBox, boosting its position in mainland Europe. On the same day, Starwood Funds agreed to buy the London-listed Balanced Commercial Property Trust for £674 million.
In both cases, a larger trust acquired a smaller business at a discount to its recorded underlying net asset value (NAV). In the case of Segro, its deal worked out at a premium of around 27% to EuroBox’s closing price before the latter company put itself up for sale, but the price implied a discount of 14% to the last reported NAV. Meanwhile, Starwood paid a premium of 21.5% for Balanced, but a discount of 9% to the company’s last reported NAV.
The Reit price?
Reit NAVs have always been subject to a degree of individual interpretation, and these two deals illustrate the current level of uncertainty in the market. Trust NAVs are calculated based on multiple factors, such as the estimated rental value of the property and similar transactions completed recently in the market. They are only ever a guide for investors and should never be interpreted as a hard and fast indication of underlying asset values. Ultimately, the price of the assets is limited by what any buyer is willing to pay.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Shares in Reits have been under pressure since the beginning of the interest-rate hiking cycle. Investors have struggled to digest the impact higher interest rates will have on commercial property prices. As a result of the uncertainty, we’ve seen Reits across the market trade at high double-digit discounts to NAVs (as high as 30%-40% in some cases).
Discounts in the sector have fallen as the shock of higher rates has subsided, although the deals for Tritax and Balanced show there is still a disconnect in the market between estimated NAVs and the real world.
It illustrates why investors should not latch on to NAV values in the Reit sector. The best way to understand the value of a Reit portfolio is to look at the portfolio’s underlying rental income. If the trust has a collection of properties in a certain sector with high demand, such as warehouses, let on inflation-linked contracts, the quality of income from the portfolio will be both predictable and sustainable. Inflation-linked income is also less susceptible to volatile interest rates.
Tritax EuroBox is a classic example. This company has a high-quality portfolio, but its value has been determined by the quality of income produced by the portfolio rather than the value of the portfolio itself, as the deal with Segro illustrates.
Why investors should tread carefully
There are some attractive bargains in the Reit sector, and there will be further acquisitions over the coming months and years as smaller trusts merge with larger peers to reduce costs and appeal to a wider audience of investors. However, while there are opportunities out there, there are also landmines. Very small trusts with poor-quality portfolios are unlikely to be able to attract the attention of a larger group: buyers want quality, not quantity.
It is also unlikely that institutions will come in to drive up the price. In recent years, large institutions have shifted out of smaller investment trusts (both Reits and other trusts), and this transition is now mostly complete. Smaller retail investors are the only ones left at the table in the smaller section of the market, which is no bad thing, but it does mean they have to be more careful when selecting opportunities.
There are plenty of opportunities out there for investors in the Reit market, but discounts are likely to persist for some time. It would be sensible for investors to continue to focus on income rather than value in the sector for now.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
-
Tesla seeks approval to supply electricity to UK homes – could it disrupt the energy market?Tesla has applied for a license to supply UK households with electricity, but taking on the biggest providers could prove challenging
-
Most Brits unaware onshore bonds can help beat inheritance tax – here’s howA little-known perk of certain types of bonds can let your loved ones off the hook when it comes to inheritance tax – but two-thirds of people have never heard of them
-
Profit from the potential in funds focusing on private assetsOpinion Charlotte Cuthbertson and Tom Treanor of the Migo Opportunities Trust highlight three funds where they'd put their money
-
Camellia: an unusual tea producer that rewards patient investorsCamellia is shedding its eclectically diverse portfolio of assets to concentrate on its strengths. For investors, it's a rare opportunity
-
How to cash in on investment trusts that are selling upManaged wind-downs and portfolio sales can be an attractive opportunity for patient investors
-
How to approach active ETFsActive ETFs have several advantages over other forms of open-ended investment vehicles, says David Prosser
-
Emerging markets must deliver growthEmerging markets have benefitted from the rotation away from the US – but can the rally last?
-
8 of the best houses for sale with dining terracesThe best houses for sale with dining terraces – from an Arts & Crafts property in Great Missenden, Buckinghamshire, to a duplex apartment in a garden square in Kensington with a decked roof terrace
-
European funds: investors have 'a luxury of choice'A series of mergers is bringing consolidation among European funds, but investors should benefit, says Max King
-
Fifty years of investment fiascos – a few examples to learn fromA benign market backdrop over the past 50 years has not prevented recurrent routs, says Max King
