Fill your portfolio with your very best ideas
Fund managers’ top picks beat the market, but the rest of their portfolios often add little value, says Chris Sholto Heaton.
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
It’s widely accepted that your portfolio should be well-diversified to prevent a single disastrous decision from wiping out a large chunk of your wealth. At the same time, if a portfolio is too large, your chances of outperforming the market shrink and you might as well hold a cheap tracker fund.
These extremes are self-evident: the big question is the number of holdings that gives you the best trade-off between return and risk. Research by Miguel Antón of the University of Madrid, Randolph Cohen of Harvard Business School, and Christopher Polk of the London School of Economics gives us an interesting way to think about this. Their paper Best Ideas looks at how many of a fund manager’s highest-conviction stocks make a contribution to beating the market.
Based on holdings in US mutual funds between 1983 and 2018, they found that managers’ top picks outperformed the market by 2.8%-4.5% per year on average (depending on exactly how you measure risk-adjusted performance) – but this only extends to the top three-to-five highest-conviction ones. “The vast majority of the other stocks managers hold do not exhibit significant outperformance.”
Try 6 free issues of MoneyWeek today
Get unparalleled financial insight, analysis and expert opinion you can profit from.
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Drag on returns
If investors only have a few stellar ideas at any one time, this implies that portfolios pretty rapidly grow to the point where no potential alpha gets added. Given that many funds run portfolios of 50 or even 100 stocks, it’s obvious that the vast majority can’t contribute much and the extra cost and time of looking after them is a drag on returns. However, cutting the portfolio down too much means that risk soars.
With five stocks, the cost associated with one going badly wrong is vast – and even if all ideas ultimately work out, volatility along the way will usually be staggering. For institutions, one answer could be to divide a portfolio up by regions and industries, and hire different managers to run ultra-concentrated fivestock portfolios in each area, suggests Cohen in an interview with Citywire. The result would be a diversified portfolio, but one that does not simply replicate the market.
Private investors can’t do the same and in any case our portfolios are often quite concentrated. Still, this kind of thinking may help.
Does your portfolio consist of your very best ideas across several complementary sectors and strategies, or alternatively a smaller number of high-potential picks plus a cheap tracker to diversify away some of the risk? Or have you ended up with a large pool of similar stocks, all driven by the same factors? Do you hold a few distinctive focused funds? Or have you got a grab-bag of 100-stock monsters that just add up to the market portfolio?
In short, assume that you may only make a few good decisions, then try to do so in a way that gives the successes a chance to make a difference.
See also:
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.

Cris Sholt Heaton is the contributing editor for MoneyWeek.
He is an investment analyst and writer who has been contributing to MoneyWeek since 2006 and was managing editor of the magazine between 2016 and 2018. He is experienced in covering international investing, believing many investors still focus too much on their home markets and that it pays to take advantage of all the opportunities the world offers.
He often writes about Asian equities, international income and global asset allocation.
-
Pensioners ‘running down larger pots’ to avoid inheritance tax as rule change loomsChanges to inheritance tax (IHT) rules for unused pension pots from April 2027 could trigger an ‘exodus of large defined contribution pension pots’, as retirees spend their savings rather than leave their loved ones with an IHT bill.
-
Why do experts think emerging markets will outperform?Emerging markets were one of the top-performing themes of 2025, but they could have further to run as global investors diversify
-
Three Indian stocks poised to profitIndian stocks are making waves. Here, professional investor Gaurav Narain of the India Capital Growth Fund highlights three of his favourites
-
UK small-cap stocks ‘are ready to run’Opinion UK small-cap stocks could be set for a multi-year bull market, with recent strong performance outstripping the large-cap indices
-
Hints of a private credit crisis rattle investorsThere are similarities to 2007 in private credit. Investors shouldn’t panic, but they should be alert to the possibility of a crash.
-
Investing in Taiwan: profit from the rise of Asia’s Silicon ValleyTaiwan has become a technology manufacturing powerhouse. Smart investors should buy in now, says Matthew Partridge
-
‘Why you should mix bitcoin and gold’Opinion Bitcoin and gold are both monetary assets and tend to move in opposite directions. Here's why you should hold both
-
Invest in the beauty industry as it takes on a new lookThe beauty industry is proving resilient in troubled times, helped by its ability to shape new trends, says Maryam Cockar
-
Should you invest in energy provider SSE?Energy provider SSE is going for growth and looks reasonably valued. Should you invest?
-
Has the market misjudged Relx?Relx shares fell on fears that AI was about to eat its lunch, but the firm remains well placed to thrive