Russia is now a liability for Western companies
Companies which have pulled out of Russia have incurred significant costs, but it's been worth it, says John Stepek – they've seen their market value increase.
Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, hundreds of companies have suspended or pulled out of operations in the country, including fast food giant McDonald’s, oil major BP and hotel chain Marriott, often incurring significant costs in the process.
And yet, according to research from US professor Jeffrey Sonnenfeld and his team at Yale School of Management, the one-off costs are worth it, as far as markets are concerned.
Looking at the share price performance of more than 1,200 firms with business interests in Russia, it turns out, says Sonnenfeld, that “equity markets are actually rewarding companies for leaving Russia while punishing those that remain behind, with divergent stock performance generally corresponding with the degree of Russian exit”.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
The team split the companies into various categories, ranging from complete “withdrawal”, to “scaling back” to “digging in”. Weighted by market capitalisation (ie, big companies have more weight than small ones), companies that withdrew saw their share price rise by 3.6% from the invasion in late February to 19 April. Indeed, “the shareholder wealth created through equity gains [has] already far surpassed the cost of one-time impairments for companies that have written down the value of their Russian assets”. Those which “dug in” by contrast, lost 6.8% on average.
Rewards for good behaviour?
The paper concludes that this outperformance is due specifically to leaving Russia, rather than compositional effects. For example, Shell and Exxon are both big oil producers who have left Russia, but have also benefited from the surge in oil prices caused by the war, so you might argue that it’s tricky to split out the cause and effect. Yet other beneficiaries include drinks giants such as AB InBev, Heineken and Carlsberg, who are not obvious beneficiaries of rising energy costs.
That said, the idea that companies are being “rewarded for speaking out”, as Sonnenfeld puts it, seems idealistic. Markets can be faddish but they don’t tend to hand out prizes for good behaviour alone. It’s more likely that there was already a long-term “Russia discount” applied to all Russian operations, and that the invasion has tipped the scales so far that exposure to Russia right now is no longer viewed as an asset at all – instead, it’s a liability.
In other words, this looks not so much like a triumph for “doing the right thing” as a fairly rational set of market reactions being played out. That said, it’s another very clear reason – as if you needed it – to be wary of having investment exposure to companies or countries where your property rights cannot be relied upon.
Sign up to Money Morning
Our team, led by award winning editors, is dedicated to delivering you the top news, analysis, and guides to help you manage your money, grow your investments and build wealth.
John Stepek is a senior reporter at Bloomberg News and a former editor of MoneyWeek magazine. He graduated from Strathclyde University with a degree in psychology in 1996 and has always been fascinated by the gap between the way the market works in theory and the way it works in practice, and by how our deep-rooted instincts work against our best interests as investors.
He started out in journalism by writing articles about the specific business challenges facing family firms. In 2003, he took a job on the finance desk of Teletext, where he spent two years covering the markets and breaking financial news.
His work has been published in Families in Business, Shares magazine, Spear's Magazine, The Sunday Times, and The Spectator among others. He has also appeared as an expert commentator on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, BBC Radio Scotland, Newsnight, Daily Politics and Bloomberg. His first book, on contrarian investing, The Sceptical Investor, was released in March 2019. You can follow John on Twitter at @john_stepek.
-
Investors pull money from UK equities as government warns of “painful” Budget
The government’s post-election honeymoon period has been short-lived, and investors are shying away from UK equities as a result
By Katie Williams Published
-
Top global fintech companies to invest in
One British fintech hogs the headlines, but there are two top performers in the US. We explain where you should put your money
By David C. Stevenson Published
-
EU tightens the noose on Russia
News Brussels has proposed a ban on all Russian oil imports. Could that work? Emily Hohler reports
By Emily Hohler Published
-
Russia ups the ante on Europe's gas supplies
News Russia's suspension of natural gas to Poland and Bulgaria saw the gas price spike by 24%. A complete shut-off could see it rise by 200%.
By Alex Rankine Published
-
Is this the end of the road for Russian gold miner Petropavlovsk?
Analysis Shares in Russian gold miner Petropavlovsk have collapsed 90% this year as sanctions have gutted its business model. Rupert Hargreaves asks if the company has a future.
By Rupert Hargreaves Published
-
Russia has become uninvestable
Opinion Geopolitics can create opportunities – but there are times when discretion is the better part of valour.
By John Stepek Published
-
Russian aggression is a big blow for the world’s “net zero” ambitions
Briefings Switching the world economy over from fossil fuels to green alternatives was always going to be a challenge. It just got a lot harder. Simon Wilson reports
By Simon Wilson Published
-
What war in Ukraine means for agricultural commodities
Analysis With both Ukraine and Russia major producers of grain, vegetable oil and fertilisers, Saloni Sardana looks at how the conflict could affect supply.
By Saloni Sardana Published
-
Index firms write off Russian stocks
News Russian stocks will be removed from MSCI’s main emerging markets index at a price that is effectively zero.
By Alex Rankine Published
-
Why inflation matters more than war
News Nuclear war isn't the kind of risk that investors can usefully take into account when building a portfolio. Inflation and stagflation, however, are.
By Alex Rankine Published